Page 1 of 1
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 03/03/2018 at 16:06 #106354 | |
Danny252
1461 posts |
I've come across several timetabled moves on realtimetrains.com that suggest a train should run from the Up Perth into Platform 6 (SM49-SM9), but no such route is available in Simsig. Is this an omission in Simsig, or has NR's timetabling department been planning impossible moves? It could well be the latter, as I've encountered several other bits of timetabling that took no consideration of reality. Log in to reply |
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 03/03/2018 at 16:41 #106358 | |
|
Danny252
1461 posts |
To extend the query, SK6504-SM9 also doesn't exist, despite SK6518-SM9 being possible over the same track.
Log in to reply |
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 03/03/2018 at 20:37 #106377 | |
|
Danny252
1461 posts |
Digging a bit further, the Rules of the Route explicitly state "Trains can not depart Stirling North to Platform 6.", so it appears that SN49-SM9 is not available. Of course, that doesn't stop the previous page in the document from quoting timings for trains arriving into both P6 and P9 from Dunblane! As for SK6504, this diagram indicates that 2 routes are available from the signal, suggesting a route into P6 should indeed be available. Log in to reply |
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 03/03/2018 at 23:41 #106386 | |
Peter Bennet
5402 posts |
I think you mean SN47? Double checked the drawings I have and SN47 is correct per that info. However, is an omission. Thanks Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 04/03/2018 at 11:12 #106393 | |
|
Danny252
1461 posts |
Peter Bennet in post 106386 said:I think you mean SN47? Indeed I do. Thanks for confirming that it's NR in the wrong regarding SN47! Last edited: 04/03/2018 at 11:20 by Danny252 Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 04/03/2018 at 12:48 #106400 | |
Hap
1039 posts |
Perhaps this will help...
Post has attachments. Log in to view them. How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue Last edited: 04/03/2018 at 12:50 by Hap Reason: Uploaded incorrect pictures..Sorted. Log in to reply |
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 04/03/2018 at 12:49 #106401 | |
|
Peter Bennet
5402 posts |
There's nothing to say that things have not changed since my info was drawn up. Can someone confirm that the current release is version number 4.2.3 please? Wiki version control has gone awry. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 04/03/2018 at 12:51 #106403 | |
|
Hap
1039 posts |
Peter Bennet in post 106401 said:There's nothing to say that things have not changed since my info was drawn up.Confirmed. Version 4.2 build 3 How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Peter Bennet |
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 04/03/2018 at 12:53 #106404 | |
|
Peter Bennet
5402 posts |
Hap in post 106400 said:Perhaps this will help...Thanks, though now wondering why they did not upload as embedded pictures. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
| SN49-SM9 - should this route exist? 04/03/2018 at 13:04 #106406 | |
|
Hap
1039 posts |
Peter Bennet in post 106404 said:Hap in post 106400 said:The first two I uploaded did, but after editing the post and adding two more, they didn't.Perhaps this will help...Thanks, though now wondering why they did not upload as embedded pictures. How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue Log in to reply |