Page 1 of 1
Woking PSB 01/04/2010 at 08:18 #1033 | |
Champs450007
97 posts |
Was thinking about this yesterday, what would anyone think to about having a woking SimSig? Even though it doesnt cover a large area the area is busy with some shunting moves and freight at woking. What does everyone think?
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 01/04/2010 at 08:18 #8038 | |
Champs450007
97 posts |
Was thinking about this yesterday, what would anyone think to about having a woking SimSig? Even though it doesnt cover a large area the area is busy with some shunting moves and freight at woking. What does everyone think?
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 01/04/2010 at 11:46 #8048 | |
UKTrainMan
1803 posts |
Actually sounds like quite a good idea. However I would have to ask if you could detail the area this would cover? I would make the immediate assumption that [consulting the "London & the South East" map] it covers from perhaps Byfleet & New Haw to maybe Farnborough (Main) / Aldershot (on the line towards Basingstoke and beyond) and Guildford (on the line towards Portsmouth) which sounds like a reasonable area of control however I wouldn't be surprised if I've totally over-shot the area of control. Still, I'd like to know either way. Thanks. Any views and / or opinions expressed by myself are from me personally and do not represent those of any company I either work for or am a consultant for. Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 01/04/2010 at 12:29 #8049 | |
ralphjwchadkirk
275 posts |
Not Aldershot - up to the mech box at Ash Vale. Guildford is correct (well I assume so as there is a Guildford ASC!). Not sure about the rest.
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 01/04/2010 at 14:00 #8052 | |
Sacro
1171 posts |
It'd chain to Wimbledon at Berrylands, Basingstoke just short of Farnborough and Ash Dale Jn box as well as Guildford at Worplesdon.
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 01/04/2010 at 15:12 #8054 | |
mfcooper
707 posts |
And Feltham between Chertsy and Addlestone
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 01/04/2010 at 18:19 #8062 | |
Champs450007
97 posts |
Yeh thats right that they do all connect to them boxes. You would control the trains from addlestone - weybridge/byfleet and new haw from the feltham box which also the freight goes and comes from. I know during the rush hour alot of trains come through frequently and even outside the rush hour its still a busy service
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 01/04/2010 at 18:33 #8063 | |
ralphjwchadkirk
275 posts |
I could get you the name and email address for the LOM there to contact him about it?
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 21/08/2010 at 09:25 #10873 | |
Sam Tugwell
494 posts |
id love a woking sim, if wimbledon was created then it would strengthen the lines in the south east
"Signalman Exeter" Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 21/08/2010 at 12:18 #10874 | |
Zoe
252 posts |
Sam Tugwell said:if wimbledon was created then it would strengthen the lines in the south east I doubt we will see Wimbledon considering it has been done by TRESIM. Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 22/08/2010 at 07:45 #10893 | |
Champs450007
97 posts |
Unfortunately as zoe said TRESIM has already done a wimbledon area sim so unlikly we will have one. The woking psb though should provide enough interest on its own though with it controlling alot of the mainline with a yard at woking and plenty of mainline movements.
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 22/08/2010 at 18:02 #10908 | |
Tristan
60 posts |
Still it is hard to deny that that woking would make a good simulation.
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 23/08/2010 at 11:45 #10919 | |
Jan
906 posts |
Champs450007 said:Unfortunately as zoe said TRESIM has already done a wimbledon area sim so unlikly we will have one. I remember Geoff saying somewhere - maybe in the old forum - that some kind of grandfather's rights apply to the Waterloo simulation, and it would be possible to extend it to the full area covered by Wimbledon ASC. I might be wrong, though... EDIT: spelling corrected Two million people attempt to use Birmingham's magnificent rail network every year, with just over a million of them managing to get further than Smethwick. Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 23/08/2010 at 14:55 #10921 | |
UKTrainMan
1803 posts |
Jan said:I remember Geoff saying somewhere - maybe in the old forum - that some kind of grandfather's right apply to the Waterloo simulation, and it would be possible to extend it to the full area covered by Wimbledon ASC. I might be wrong, though...To The Wayback Machine! (I will endeavour to edit this post with the outcome of my trip in that beast of a machine I've just name-checked). EDITED TO ADD; Cannot access actual posts/threads on the old forum, I can get as far as viewing the thread titles but cannot actually 'enter' the threads themselves to be able to read them Any views and / or opinions expressed by myself are from me personally and do not represent those of any company I either work for or am a consultant for. Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 23/08/2010 at 21:20 #10928 | |
Champs450007
97 posts |
That would be good if the waterloo simulation would be able to be extended. The further you go from waterloo even just to staines,woking,dorking etc you also have level crossings and different branches would make for a even more challenging sim
Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 30/08/2010 at 05:51 #11143 | |
kaiwhara
587 posts |
I am all for Woking personally, and also wonder whether Basingstoke would have enough operating potential if it was also to cover some/all of the missing portion of Eastleigh panel as well? (p.s. only 11 months of real signalling left ) Sorry guys, I am in the business of making people wait! Log in to reply |
Woking PSB 30/08/2010 at 09:39 #11150 | |
Champs450007
97 posts |
kaiwhara said:I am all for Woking personally, and also wonder whether Basingstoke would have enough operating potential if it was also to cover some/all of the missing portion of Eastleigh panel as well?Basingstoke would also be a good one with the Reading line having XC, FGW and Freight entering into this area, aswell as barton mill sidings and basingstoke south sidings which the Basingstoke stoppers use in between services. Log in to reply |