Page 1 of 1
| Marylebone: A few timetabling niggles 23/11/2020 at 11:24 #134068 | |
GW43125
495 posts |
Hi all, I've come across a few minor issues with the sim whilst timetabling, and would appreciate if someone could take a look. -Trains bound for Banbury LMD report in the analysis as terminating with no onward working. I haven't checked to see if they drop off the sim or not. -Trains from Banbury Reservoir Neck will not validate to Banbury DGL or any other location (see first attached image) -There appear to be two instances of Banbury DGL in the editor. Only one validates but this isn't an issue -Schedules via Banbury UGL don't validate, the validation screen doesn't offer the UGL as an option, but offers a mystery platform 5, which doesn't validate either. Screenshots of a timetable and validation screen attached. Loader 5.8, Sim 3.11 Many thanks, Jamie.  
Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Last edited: 23/11/2020 at 11:30 by GW43125 Reason: None given Log in to reply The following user said thank you: haydenrobertson |
| Marylebone: A few timetabling niggles 23/11/2020 at 12:07 #134071 | |
wellgroomed
110 posts |
Good luck with the TT. Banbury Depot should work fine with arrivals in both directions. Reservoir Sidings can't be validated. The siding arrangements were continually in flux as the sim was being developed. The balance was to go ahead, rather than delay any further. The RHTT can be sent to Banbury Depot instead. Banbury Up Loop can not be validated, you're right. Time the services to pass through Platform 3 instead, aside from 4O95 (IIRC) none of the freight services have relief at Banbury. Cheers, Greg Log in to reply |
| Marylebone: A few timetabling niggles 23/11/2020 at 19:08 #134098 | |
|
GW43125
495 posts |
Hi Greg, Thanks for clarifying the issues with the depot and reservoir sidings, however I do need to recess 4O23 in the UGL as there is a voyager right behind it, and 4O23 won't fit in 4. Is there another workaround, or could the UGL possibly be added please? Thanks, Jamie. Last edited: 23/11/2020 at 19:16 by GW43125 Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Marylebone: A few timetabling niggles 23/11/2020 at 20:00 #134100 | |
|
wellgroomed
110 posts |
Two options for 4O23. Either use Platform 1 at Banbury, by routing it over the Down Goods Loop from Reservoir Junction, or alternatively keep 4O23 running through Banbury ahead of 1O02 and regulate it at Aynho Junction UGL. 4O23 would pass Aynho Jn at 06/52 and arrive into Aynho UGL at 06.54. My preference and probably the most realistic is to use Aynho UGL. 4O23 is consistently a fixed formation at 629m, so has ample room to use this option instead of the Banbury Up Loop. Log in to reply |