Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Timetables > Warrington PSB > Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX

Page 1 of 1

Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 22/12/2020 at 00:28 #135039
headshot119
Avatar
4869 posts
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX

This thread is for discussion of the Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX timetable.

"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer
Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 23/12/2020 at 13:42 #135140
njimiller
Avatar
142 posts
When chained to Manc Picc, this timetable doesn't include 6J39 which the corresponding Manc Picc does.

Thanks

Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 23/12/2020 at 21:43 #135185
tjfrancis
Avatar
359 posts
6M02 And 6M61 From Latcford Sdgs they got the same timing should ther be a decision for only one of then to run. save is provided
Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
I am dyslexic so please consider this when reading my posts
Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 23/12/2020 at 22:11 #135189
Meld
Avatar
1111 posts
njimiller in post 135140 said:
When chained to Manc Picc, this timetable doesn't include 6J39 which the corresponding Manc Picc does.

Thanks
Resolved for next update

Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!!
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: njimiller
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 26/12/2020 at 13:09 #135386
Meld
Avatar
1111 posts
tjfrancis in post 135185 said:
6M02 And 6M61 From Latcford Sdgs they got the same timing should ther be a decision for only one of then to run. save is provided
Resolved for next TT update - had to jusggle the decisions a little. 6M61 added to 6M02 removed from 6M62.

In theory both trains could run, as one of the 6M61s runs to Basford hall instead of Fiddlers Ferry.

Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!!
Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 27/12/2020 at 06:55 #135421
swiftaw
Avatar
271 posts
So 3Q26 reverses at Sig 519/520. I assume that 519 should be used so as not to block Parkside Jn for 1U02?
Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 30/12/2020 at 17:46 #135645
swiftaw
Avatar
271 posts
I'm chaining Warrington with Huyton using this timetable and I found an issue with 6F89/H13594.

The timetables between the two sims don't seem to match. It appears just before 07:00am at Olive Mount Jn heading to Rainhill, but when it switches over to the Warrington Sim at Rainhill the timetable looks like its coming from somewhere like MSC Sidings.

Looking at the Warrington timetable, 6f89/H13594A enters from Rainhill, so maybe the error is on the Huyton timetable. (I'll cross post there).

Last edited: 30/12/2020 at 17:51 by swiftaw
Reason: Fix typos

Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 30/12/2020 at 17:48 #135647
headshot119
Avatar
4869 posts
Thanks reported on Mantis 32641
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer
Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 30/12/2020 at 18:56 #135650
Meld
Avatar
1111 posts
Its the same train in both sims - the A on the Huyton entry in Warrington is for re-entry rules to work - Huytons modified to match Warringtons
Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!!
Last edited: 30/12/2020 at 19:10 by Meld
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 11/01/2021 at 12:49 #136232
swiftaw
Avatar
271 posts
Is 4F90 missing a run-around at Latchford Sidings?
Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 11/01/2021 at 13:55 #136235
Meld
Avatar
1111 posts
swiftaw in post 136232 said:
Is 4F90 missing a run-around at Latchford Sidings?
It was originally planned to berth there as it is end of day - run round added - and continuation in Edge Hill after midnight as far as Wapping Sdgs

Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!!
Log in to reply
Warrington PSB 2015-04-08 SX 09/01/2022 at 21:08 #143458
9pN1SEAp
Avatar
1180 posts
.
Jamie S (JAMS)
Last edited: 09/01/2022 at 21:46 by 9pN1SEAp
Reason: None given

Log in to reply