Page 2 of 2
| Non-described train in berth X*** 28/12/2020 at 16:42 #135479 | |
Albert
1315 posts |
Dionysusnu in post 135475 said:Except not when the berth has been filled manually already. That's what annoys me the most about this warning message.When I said that I couldn't reproduce it, I meant to say: I don't get a message when I fill this specific berth manually and route the train onto the Down Main. So I believe this berth is not affected, though a number of others on SwinDid are (mostly appearing to be intermediate shunts - with the notable exception of signal 6407 which does not generate this message but generates an 'off planned path' instead.) AJP in games Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 29/12/2020 at 14:21 #135519 | |
|
mjkerr
195 posts |
I have just had this same message on Carlisle 2000 "Non-described Train in Berth COUT" I did not appear in my last full one hour test run of my 1986 timetable This only happened after I added the Whitehaven services; Class 108 arrival which turns into a ECS I completely forgot about it I therefore assume it forms part of the requirement to change a headcode once a train arrives, as the headcode for next service is not processed automatically DELETED Last edited: 29/12/2020 at 14:22 by mjkerr Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 29/12/2020 at 14:47 #135521 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
mjkerr in post 135519 said:I have just had this same message on Carlisle 2000No in this case it's a simulation issue which needs to be resolved. It's already on Mantis to be investigated. "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 29/12/2020 at 15:39 #135527 | |
|
mjkerr
195 posts |
mjkerr in post 135519 said:I have just had this same message on Carlisle 2000 As above, I am now getting it on previously tested Light Loco movements I now have it duplicating and ignoring, where it never appeared before DELETED Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 29/12/2020 at 15:40 #135529 | |
|
mjkerr
195 posts |
headshot119 in post 135521 said:No in this case it's a simulation issue which needs to be resolved. It's already on Mantis to be investigated. Agreed, something in the update that occured yesterday Initially I thought it was the DMU services that I added and had not tested However the DMU had now left the Panel, only thing on screen were the two Light Loco engines, never had the issue before on them I deleted the TD and the issue stopped Put the TD back in, and it returned DELETED Last edited: 29/12/2020 at 15:42 by mjkerr Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 31/12/2020 at 14:45 #135705 | |
bugsy
1766 posts |
Is this something that one should report, only I've just had a couple at Stirling in the 15-10-09 04:45 tt in the Central Scotland simulation. I just interposed manually and carried on as you do.
Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate. Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 31/12/2020 at 15:08 #135709 | |
Meld
1111 posts |
bugsy in post 135705 said:Is this something that one should report, only I've just had a couple at Stirling in the 15-10-09 04:45 tt in the Central Scotland simulation. I just interposed manually and carried on as you do.https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Forum/ThreadView/52664 Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!! Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 31/12/2020 at 16:59 #135723 | |
|
bugsy
1766 posts |
Meld in post 135709 said:bugsy in post 135705 said:Brain malfunction coming up: All very interesting but is this answer to my question a 'yes' or a 'no'Is this something that one should report, only I've just had a couple at Stirling in the 15-10-09 04:45 tt in the Central Scotland simulation. I just interposed manually and carried on as you do.https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Forum/ThreadView/52664 Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate. Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 31/12/2020 at 17:09 #135725 | |
Steamer
3984 posts |
bugsy in post 135723 said:Meld in post 135709 said:If the message is accurate (i.e. it reports a non-described train at signal 52, and there is indeed a non-described train at signal 52), then the message is correct.bugsy in post 135705 said:Brain malfunction coming up: All very interesting but is this answer to my question a 'yes' or a 'no'Is this something that one should report, only I've just had a couple at Stirling in the 15-10-09 04:45 tt in the Central Scotland simulation. I just interposed manually and carried on as you do.https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Forum/ThreadView/52664 If the message is wrong, references a signal that doesn't have a TD berth, or something 'under the hood' like COUT, then please report it. The messages form their own message type, so you can stop them producing a pop-up box via F3 if you so wish. "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 31/12/2020 at 17:19 #135727 | |
|
bugsy
1766 posts |
Thank you. That's nice and clear. I will note the signal number and act accordingly.
Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate. Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 03/01/2021 at 22:32 #135944 | |
|
mjkerr
195 posts |
mjkerr in post 135519 said:I have just had this same message on Carlisle 2000 Many THANKS to the person that has solved and corrected this I have now run two three hour (00:00 to 02:59) tests of my latest revised 1986 timetable and it did not appear once DELETED Last edited: 03/01/2021 at 22:34 by mjkerr Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Non-described train in berth X*** 09/12/2021 at 19:34 #142847 | |
|
Dionysusnu
577 posts |
Dionysusnu in post 135271 said:Trains routed from S660 to S938 on King's cross, incorrectly generate this message with berth 0939. Unsure if this belongs in a new thread. This berth step from S660 to S938 now does not work anymore. However, the warning is not always thrown. Technical info: Quote:
While testing to reproduce, I noticed that there does not seem to be a location for reversing at S223 (Bragbury Jn), so a train from Langley Stone Terminal has to run all the way to Hertford North to reach Stevenage platform 4. A reproduction timetable has been attached. Once TEST has made the trip and departs platform 4, an XXXX code will appear at S939, and sometimes [inconsistent during my testing] a warning thrown. Technical info in the reproduction: Quote:
Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Log in to reply |