Page 1 of 1
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 23/02/2022 at 23:12 #145346 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 This thread is for discussion of the North Kent SX 2015-04-08 timetable. "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Last edited: 23/02/2022 at 23:30 by headshot119 Reason: Missing bracket Log in to reply |
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 28/02/2022 at 23:40 #145489 | |
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
Hi The train type "465/466 4+4+2" has max. speed of 76mph whereas the rest of the class have 75mph max. Is this a typo? Thanks Jamie Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 28/02/2022 at 23:49 #145490 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
Mantis 35825
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 06/03/2022 at 02:37 #145613 | |
Jriver
50 posts |
Not if it's your going home trip.............
Log in to reply |
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 06/03/2022 at 16:37 #145638 | |
kbarber
1742 posts |
Jriver in post 145613 said:Not if it's your going home trip.............In that case it's a definite error... start at 80mph and work up LOL Log in to reply |
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 05/04/2022 at 17:42 #146047 | |
Jan
906 posts |
Same question as for the 2009 timetable – no random shunts around Slade Green and Hoo Junction?
Two million people attempt to use Birmingham's magnificent rail network every year, with just over a million of them managing to get further than Smethwick. Log in to reply |
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 15/10/2022 at 22:09 #148385 | |
Phil-jmw
675 posts |
1Q61 0550 Hither Green - Hither Green infrastructure monitoring train is incorrectly shown to be a UTU. UTU's run as 3Qxx not 1Qxx, transit max speed 75mph, and record at 30mph, whereas 1Q61 is shown as max speed 90mph. This will be a PLPR or other high speed track recording train. And above all else, no train planner considering a long railway career will plan a UTU to be recording around the North Kent suburban routes during the day, given the aforementioned max recording speed.
Log in to reply |
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 15/10/2022 at 22:22 #148386 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
Phil-jmw in post 148385 said:1Q61 0550 Hither Green - Hither Green infrastructure monitoring train is incorrectly shown to be a UTU. UTU's run as 3Qxx not 1Qxx, transit max speed 75mph, and record at 30mph, whereas 1Q61 is shown as max speed 90mph. This will be a PLPR or other high speed track recording train. And above all else, no train planner considering a long railway career will plan a UTU to be recording around the North Kent suburban routes during the day, given the aforementioned max recording speed.So if I'm understanding correctly, the issue is the train category says "NWR (1/5) Electro Diesel (73+UTU Mk1/2+73)" instead of "NWR (1/5) Electro Diesel (Measurement Train) 114m"? It's got the correct 90mph maximum speed applicable already? "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |
North Kent SX 2015-04-08 15/10/2022 at 23:38 #148388 | |
Phil-jmw
675 posts |
headshot119 in post 148386 said:Phil-jmw in post 148385 said:Correct.1Q61 0550 Hither Green - Hither Green infrastructure monitoring train is incorrectly shown to be a UTU. UTU's run as 3Qxx not 1Qxx, transit max speed 75mph, and record at 30mph, whereas 1Q61 is shown as max speed 90mph. This will be a PLPR or other high speed track recording train. And above all else, no train planner considering a long railway career will plan a UTU to be recording around the North Kent suburban routes during the day, given the aforementioned max recording speed.So if I'm understanding correctly, the issue is the train category says "NWR (1/5) Electro Diesel (73+UTU Mk1/2+73)" instead of "NWR (1/5) Electro Diesel (Measurement Train) 114m"? It's got the correct 90mph maximum speed applicable already? Log in to reply |