Page 1 of 1
| London bridge ASC 2009-10-15 suspected missing rule 28/04/2022 at 18:07 #146297 | |
Rocangus
52 posts |
1Q71 (L41357) and 1Q73 (L41115) seem awfully similar in timings and are both track recorder trains... Are they meant to both run at the same time?
Log in to reply |
| London bridge ASC 2009-10-15 suspected missing rule 28/04/2022 at 18:43 #146298 | |
|
JamesN
1607 posts |
They are meant to be different “runs” yes; there was a mantis ticket for the missing decision but I don’t have the ticket number to hand.
Log in to reply The following user said thank you: ajax103 |
| London bridge ASC 2009-10-15 suspected missing rule 28/04/2022 at 22:14 #146302 | |
Meld
1111 posts |
JamesN in post 146298 said:They are meant to be different “runs” yes; there was a mantis ticket for the missing decision but I don’t have the ticket number to hand.Indeed and the decision is set for only 1 1Qxx to workk on any particular session, when adding these decisions in I missed applying the decision to L41357s schedule, if you want to edit your own then set the schedules decision as 1Q60 and the choice to L41357. This is been added to the timetable v5.4, so the decision will work correctly with only one of the 1Qs working on that particular runthrough of the TT. I'm going to hold back on releasing the timetable until the next sim update, which shouldnt be far away. Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!! Log in to reply The following users said thank you: JamesN, flabberdacks, ajax103 |