Issues with entering trains

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Timetables > Three Bridges > Issues with entering trains

Page 1 of 1

Issues with entering trains 13/01/2023 at 21:17 #150141
Trainman525
Avatar
83 posts
Online
Hi, I'm playing Three Bridges chained with the Lancing sim. I'm playing the 2019 timetable and I'm having trains entering but picking up their 14:00 seeding timetable rather than the entering timetable. Attached is the save of Three Bridges and Lancing including an image of 1H35 entered with the incorrect timetable picked up.

Its a minor problem, just a case of selecting run to another timetable.

Thanks in advance.


Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Log in to reply
Issues with entering trains 14/01/2023 at 15:39 #150145
headshot119
Avatar
4869 posts
I think it just needs a slight adjustment to the UID for the 1400 seed train. Mantis 37717

EDIT

Meld has looked into this and the 2019 Lancing timetable in use is a user contributed timetable, unfortunately the UIDs that have been used don't match Three Bridges so the timetables aren't compatible for chaining.

"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer
Last edited: 14/01/2023 at 16:03 by headshot119
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: Meld, Trainman525
Issues with entering trains 28/01/2023 at 20:14 #150301
rfw
Avatar
178 posts
headshot119 in post 150145 said:
Meld has looked into this and the 2019 Lancing timetable in use is a user contributed timetable, unfortunately the UIDs that have been used don't match Three Bridges so the timetables aren't compatible for chaining.
I've spent the afternoon modifying the Lancing timetable to chain properly with Three Bridges (which I have verified with JAMS's Chaining tool)

I have submitted the updated version to the uploads area, which I'll link it Here if it gets approved

The train now standing on platform 2, should be on the rails
Last edited: 28/01/2023 at 20:38 by rfw
Reason: Grammar

Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: postal, Trainman525