Page 1 of 1
| Stourbridge Junction FAQ 18/09/2023 at 17:23 #153347 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
Stourbridge Junction Frequently Asked Questions Do you think you've found a bug? Or do you have a problem running the simulation, check through this thread first. Remember timetables are dealt with in the relevant timetable thread. When reporting an issue make sure you check out our guide on How to Report An Issue "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Last edited: 18/09/2023 at 18:02 by headshot119 Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Stourbridge Junction FAQ 21/02/2024 at 21:04 #155440 | |
9pN1SEAp
1189 posts |
Got a phantom occupancy at Round Oak. 6V05 has just stepped past DR7706 and the indication has just come back up on the section from the sidings. Thanks Jamie Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Jamie S (JAMS) Last edited: 21/02/2024 at 21:06 by 9pN1SEAp Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Stourbridge Junction FAQ 21/02/2024 at 22:37 #155442 | |
Hap
1049 posts |
Berth doesn't have the correct TC allocated. Mantis 40338 How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue Log in to reply The following user said thank you: 9pN1SEAp |
| Stourbridge Junction FAQ 22/07/2024 at 07:21 #157904 | |
jtai13
6 posts |
I'm getting an "chaining arrangements inconsistent" when chaining with Saltley. Occurs in the 2007 with and without extra Locs. "Recursive bug report: Cross boundary track TSJDV not found ''TSJDU'' ''TSJDV'' ''TSJDU'' Log in to reply |
| Stourbridge Junction FAQ 22/07/2024 at 15:38 #157911 | |
|
eps125
164 posts |
jtai13 in post 157904 said:I'm getting an "chaining arrangements inconsistent" when chaining with Saltley. Occurs in the 2007 with and without extra Locs.Good Afternoon, Mantis 41196 reported for investigation into the fringe between these two simulations. Thanks for the report. Log in to reply The following user said thank you: jtai13 |