Page 1 of 1
| may 2023 plymouth 04/01/2024 at 22:21 #154975 | |
rodney30
165 posts |
Hi i have been playing this tt. I have noticed that quite a few of the 1Cxx down trains do not enter at Totnes. Please see attached infomation. Also I have messaged the TT author as well. Many thanks Rodney 30 OS: Windows 10 Home 64bit Loader: SimSig Loader version 5.28; Sim: Simulation Plymouth; data version 2.4 License: Dynamic license in use TT: Plymouth May 2023 SX v1.0.0 TT filename: Plymouth May 2023 SX.WTT TT merged: False Sim upgrade: False Loader upgrade: False Save reloaded: True NPERFECT active at start NBEGINNER choice 1 NSTANDARD choice 2 NDIFFICULT choice 3 NSTORM choice 4 NEXTRASIG active at start NEXTRASIG_TRUE active at start Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Log in to reply |
| may 2023 plymouth 04/01/2024 at 22:27 #154976 | |
|
Benjwri
11 posts |
Hi, Thanks for letting me know, not sure what’s going on here as it definitely used to work. Unfortunately I underwent surgery today, so will not be in a position to fix it in the near future. If someone else can work out a quick change I might get a chance to make it but I cannot promise anything. Log in to reply The following user said thank you: rodney30 |
| may 2023 plymouth 05/01/2024 at 05:45 #154978 | |
ajax103
1120 posts |
The issue is that the timetable author has Special Timing Pattern ticked for those 1CXXs that have not entered which doesn't actually create the train but is used for ARS special timing patterns. If the author is fine, I can go though the said timetable and put in the corrections for them later this morning? Log in to reply The following user said thank you: rodney30 |
| may 2023 plymouth 05/01/2024 at 11:08 #154979 | |
|
ajax103
1120 posts |
Benjwri in post 154976 said:Hi,Have gone though the timetable and found the issue affected the following services only: 1C72 to 1C88 1C90 to 1C96 All other services not affected and updated timetable submitted for upload as original author as stated above unable to resolve in the near future. Log in to reply The following user said thank you: rodney30 |
| may 2023 plymouth 05/01/2024 at 12:38 #154980 | |
|
Benjwri
11 posts |
ajax103 in post 154978 said:The issue is that the timetable author has Special Timing Pattern ticked for those 1CXXs that have not entered which doesn't actually create the train but is used for ARS special timing patterns.Thanks for fixing for me while I am unable as due to my injury will not have access to a Windows computer for a while. That is very odd, I certainly did not intentionally tick that, and I am almsot certain these trains entered when I did a 24 hour run through of the simulation. Log in to reply The following users said thank you: ajax103, rodney30 |
| may 2023 plymouth 05/01/2024 at 16:23 #154981 | |
|
ajax103
1120 posts |
Benjwri in post 154980 said:ajax103 in post 154978 said:No worries, went though the entire timetable to double check just to make sure.The issue is that the timetable author has Special Timing Pattern ticked for those 1CXXs that have not entered which doesn't actually create the train but is used for ARS special timing patterns.Thanks for fixing for me while I am unable as due to my injury will not have access to a Windows computer for a while. That is very odd, I certainly did not intentionally tick that, and I am almsot certain these trains entered when I did a 24 hour run through of the simulation. 
Log in to reply The following users said thank you: rodney30, Benjwri |