Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Model railway signal box interior advice

You are here: Home > Forum > Miscellaneous > Open mic (non-railway) > Model railway signal box interior advice

Page 3 of 3

Model railway signal box interior advice 14/12/2024 at 14:49 #159483
TUT
Avatar
545 posts
Anothersignalman in post 159477 said:
Steamer in post 159467 said:
On double (or more) track lines worked under Absolute Block, the UK code is 3-5-5 and works much the same as you describe, the train would be cautioned at the previous signalbox (either verbally or via a green flag held out of the window) before entering the section. The 'Warning' could be upgraded to a full line clear by 3-3-5 if the full clearing point subsequently became available prior to the train entering the section.
How is 3-3-5 useful, given that the approaching train has already entered the section and there is no way to communicate that information from the signalbox in rear to the approaching train?
3-3-5 is to be sent before you receive train entering section.

Anothersignalman in post 159477 said:
Steamer in post 159467 said:
Semaphore stop signals must be held at danger until the train is almost at a stand at them unless all signals to which the preceding distant signal applies can be cleared. While technically a driver passing a distant at caution could infer from an already-clear home signal that the signaller had since been able to clear everything, drivers would generally proceed in the expectation of each stop signal being at red. There were various unofficial 'hurry up' signals given by signalmen in the past to reassure the driver that they had the road and could open up a bit.
How is that procedure modified with fixed distant signals?
Generally speaking it isn't, although the Sectional Appendix may list signals to which this requirement does not apply and drivers must then understand that even if such a signal is cleared before they have stopped or nearly stopped at it that does not mean that all subsequent signals worked from the box are, or are about to be, cleared. This was discussed recently here.

https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Forum/PostView/159266

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Model railway signal box interior advice 14/12/2024 at 15:40 #159486
jc92
Avatar
3701 posts
Anothersignalman in post 159477 said:
Steamer in post 159467 said:
That wouldn't be used on single lines, as the clearing point would extend into the loop, there's just a specific ban on both trains entering the loop itself simultaneously, as any minor overrun could result in a collision. Not necessarily a requirement if there's a sufficient distance between the signal and the points, but as passing loop layouts are typically quite compact it would be rare to have that much space.
I suppose the alternative would be if a crossing loop had overrun stub sidings, or at least catch points, beyond the departure home signals?

[quote=Steamer;post=159467]On double (or more) track lines worked under Absolute Block, the UK code is 3-5-5 and works much the same as you describe, the train would be cautioned at the previous signalbox (either verbally or via a green flag held out of the window) before entering the section. The 'Warning' could be upgraded to a full line clear by 3-3-5 if the full clearing point subsequently became available prior to the train entering the section.
How is 3-3-5 useful, given that the approaching train has already entered the section and there is no way to communicate that information from the signalbox in rear to the approaching train?

3-3-5 is given if the train has been accepted under reg 5, but can now be accepted under reg 4 BEFORE the train has entered section, at which point the box in rear will clear all his main aspects rather than drawing the train to a stand and giving a warner aspect or advising the driver verbally. It isn't used where the train has already entered section.

Line clear but Station or junction obstructed (referred to in the 1972 book as line clear to home signal only) was relevant to permissive block working only as reg 5 wasn't employed. Bell code 4-3 used to accept the train (there were pre grouping variations on this). in such circumstances the train would be cautioned, similarly to if it had been accepted permissively or under reg 5 and the driver would drive under caution assuming the section to be occupied. While identical to the driver, the distinction for signalman was the fact that only one train was actually in section at the time, rather than tracking multiple permissive trains.

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Model railway signal box interior advice 14/12/2024 at 15:50 #159487
jc92
Avatar
3701 posts
kbarber in post 159455 said:
bill_gensheet in post 159398 said:
Anothersignalman in post 159396 said:
Ron_J in post 159389 said:
As this is a crossing point on a single line, what do people who wish to get on or off at the station do if their train is the second to arrive when crossing another train?
Shunt and redock procedure. Train A arrives platform, then reverses back, then pulls forward to mainline. Train B runs to platform and continues, then Train A proceeds.
Where single platform passing loops existed in the UK, it would be arranged never to cross two stopping passenger trains.
Loop for goods or through only.
(Abercairney, Mound, Saffron Walden)

<snip>

I second that.

Highley (Severn Valley Railway) is an example that remains to the present day. In fact, unless the loop was signalled to passenger standards, it would be illegal to accept two trains simultaneously from the box in rear, as the clearing points would overlap each other. (Certainly Highley may not, unless I missed something when I read the SBSIs, accept from both directions simultaneously.) So to cross trains you'd need to wait until the first one you'd accepted had arrived and (either) been put 'in clear' in the loop, or had tipped out and been shunted into the loop, before you could even accept from the other direction.

If the loop was signalled to passenger standards, the relevant clearing point would be the fouling point at the opposite end of the loop - but both approaching trains would need to be brought quite or nearly to a stand, then each admitted in turn (not allowable to run them both in simultaneously).
Haworth was a similar arrangement with a single platform, but a passing loop to pass the tripper if required. There was one in Anglia featured in the recent SRS magazine but I haven't got it handy to confirm the location.

Looking at the prototype, it appears the West highland doesn't have any such locations with all crossing points having two platforms.

There were several lines signalled with intermediate boxes rated "block post but not a token station" which permitted several trains to follow each other under staff and ticket arrangements occupying the single line one behind the other in the same direction, separated by said block posts. The Kettering - Huntingdon line is the first that springs to mind. In such cases, the intermediate block posts had frames and block instruments but no token instrument and were responsible only for the separation of trains following each other and local shunting. Intermediate boxes were unable to lock in or pass trains.

I suspect the heart of this issue is a layout being a generic arrangement, with a specific box being used and attempting to combine multiple countries practice into one. Continental modellers make the same mistake of modelling German narrow gauge with British practice in their head and it doesn't always translate. In the world of signalling there's no such thing as generic really, which is inevitably going to result in multiple differing opinions and options.

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Model railway signal box interior advice 14/12/2024 at 16:28 #159488
geswedey
Avatar
207 posts
Staverton was a Block Post and not a Token Station between Buckfastleigh and Ashburton Junction / Totnes. Buckfastleigh could only cross a Passenger and a Freight train or two Freights.
Glyn Calvert ACIRO
Last edited: 14/12/2024 at 16:30 by geswedey
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Model railway signal box interior advice 15/12/2024 at 20:26 #159502
Steamer
Avatar
3997 posts
Anothersignalman in post 159477 said:

Steamer in post 159467 said:
Semaphore stop signals must be held at danger until the train is almost at a stand at them unless all signals to which the preceding distant signal applies can be cleared. While technically a driver passing a distant at caution could infer from an already-clear home signal that the signaller had since been able to clear everything, drivers would generally proceed in the expectation of each stop signal being at red. There were various unofficial 'hurry up' signals given by signalmen in the past to reassure the driver that they had the road and could open up a bit.
How is that procedure modified with fixed distant signals?
Doesn't matter if the distant is fixed or worked- on a fixed distant the driver will always be in the position of having had a caution and then potentially seeing the first stop signal already clear before they've nearly come to a stand at it.

"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q)
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Model railway signal box interior advice 16/12/2024 at 11:24 #159516
kbarber
Avatar
1764 posts
Anothersignalman in post 159477 said:
Steamer in post 159467 said:
That wouldn't be used on single lines, as the clearing point would extend into the loop, there's just a specific ban on both trains entering the loop itself simultaneously, as any minor overrun could result in a collision. Not necessarily a requirement if there's a sufficient distance between the signal and the points, but as passing loop layouts are typically quite compact it would be rare to have that much space.
I suppose the alternative would be if a crossing loop had overrun stub sidings, or at least catch points, beyond the departure home signals?

<snip>

Open traps in advance of the loop starter would not have been acceptable in UK practice. A safety siding would be required at the very least (only needs to be a few yards long, but terminated by buffer stops). Better still, a similar siding incorporating a sand drag.

But one thought has occurred to me. Given there's quite an extensive layout here and, if the Peco (McK & H design) box is being used it points to it being quite an early layout, might there always have been two signalboxes at this location, with absolute block working between them?

If the station is 350 - 400yd long between the homes (which I presume are 2/5 and 20/22 in your signalled diagram), points are going to be over 300yd apart. I'm trying to recall the earliest Board of Trade requirements concerning distances for point operation, but I've an idea it limited facing points to 120 yards (and might even have been 100). Even if it were 150yd, it would require the box to be absolutely dead centre of the loop to comply; if it were less it will be virtually impossible to meet that requirement.

As others have mentioned, some railways either used two boxes or a signalbox at one end and a ground frame at t'other to overcome that. On the Cambrian the latter was certainly used (it was the layout at Abermule, of unfortunate memory), while the Highland Railway used the former. In both those cases it is at least arguable that the signalbox(es) were in fact no more than shunt frames, as the tablet instruments were in the station office (with release levers used on the Highland). On the Severn Valley line, though, where a similar arrangement existed at the larger stations, the signalboxes were actually fitted as such with token instruments for the single line sections and with absolute block working between them.

I can see a couple of advantages on a model of this kind.

Firstly, you wouldn't need to be trying to squeeze extra levers into a small box, so visually it would be far better. You'd need just one key token/tablet/staff machine represented in each of the boxes (unless there was also long-section working - but see below), and a set of AB instruments on the block shelf. Depending on need and likely traffic conditions, the third line might be worked as a siding with no particular co-ordination between the boxes. Or you might have 'no block' working, perhaps with a bell, and potentially local instructions restricting shunting at both ends simultaneously. (Looking at the track layout one of those feels most likely, to be honest.) Sometimes, if it was intended to use it for running movements, it would be signalled as an electric token section (an extra instrument in each box), or there might be Direction Lever working (so you need an additional blue-over-brown with a shortened handle in each box), or reversible working using standard block instruments (a second set on the block shelf), as we had on the down platform at Kensington Olympia. Certainly you'd need one of those latter setups if you were using it for running moves.

That would pretty much eliminate the restriction on simultaneous acceptance from each direction. The Up end box would be close to the level crossing and might even have a gate wheel; it would also have a home signal protecting the level crossing. (The layout as signalled in your post #159378 would not have been acceptable to the BoT unless it was built under a light railway order, in which case signalling would be minimal-to-nonexistent.) Given the distances involved, local instructions would most likely require 'normal needle' from the far end box on the line points were set for, which would allow a full Regulation 4 acceptance. There might be a 'station distant', a single fixed distant at each end of the layout applying to both boxes (common practice both at small places like this and at large and complex stations like Chester). Or you might have working distants all through (a good excuse for stop-over-distant combinations on the bracket signals, and possibly even 'outer distants' under the home signals). If the latter there might be some kind of restriction on acceptance in fog or falling snow, but as I guess you won't be modelling that it's probably academic.

Bewdley still has something like this, albeit there have been changes during the preservation years. I have a feeling they've simplified the rules since I used to volunteer there, but I recall some fairly interesting (read complicated) working. Once working distants were installed, the old Western Regulation 4A (line clear to clearing point only, 2-2-2 acceptance) was required to be used in fog or falling snow, so an approaching train would get a distant at caution a long way back and wouldn't be dependent on seeing the innermost distants to pull up at the far end homes. Meanwhile, Regulation 5 (section clear but station or junction blocked, 3-5-5 acceptance) was authorised on the up platform for trains booked to call only (so the 3-3-3 bell signal was also in use for trains booked non-stop). There was no need for Reg 5 on the down platform because the former Tenbury line provided a clearing point; meanwhile if you needed to use the 'back platform' in the down direction the North Box had to have a full 1/4 mile clearing point and there was no Reg 5 acceptance. (Answering the query about 3-3-5, it was very common to find trains approaching from both directions simultaneously, in which case Bewdley South would accept the up road at Reg 5. As soon as the down road was clear of 13 crossover, the road could be put back and 3-3-5 sent, often while the up road was still approaching the outer home. But it didn't always happen that way of course - and in some timetables the up road was actually booked to arrive first - so Reg 5 avoided it being held outside.

Hope that's a useful additional thought.

Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: TUT, Anothersignalman
Model railway signal box interior advice 16/12/2024 at 14:15 #159520
TUT
Avatar
545 posts
kbarber in post 159516 said:
Bewdley still has something like this, albeit there have been changes during the preservation years. I have a feeling they've simplified the rules since I used to volunteer there, but I recall some fairly interesting (read complicated) working. Once working distants were installed, the old Western Regulation 4A (line clear to clearing point only, 2-2-2 acceptance) was required to be used in fog or falling snow, so an approaching train would get a distant at caution a long way back and wouldn't be dependent on seeing the innermost distants to pull up at the far end homes. Meanwhile, Regulation 5 (section clear but station or junction blocked, 3-5-5 acceptance) was authorised on the up platform for trains booked to call only (so the 3-3-3 bell signal was also in use for trains booked non-stop). There was no need for Reg 5 on the down platform because the former Tenbury line provided a clearing point; meanwhile if you needed to use the 'back platform' in the down direction the North Box had to have a full 1/4 mile clearing point and there was no Reg 5 acceptance. (Answering the query about 3-3-5, it was very common to find trains approaching from both directions simultaneously, in which case Bewdley South would accept the up road at Reg 5. As soon as the down road was clear of 13 crossover, the road could be put back and 3-3-5 sent, often while the up road was still approaching the outer home. But it didn't always happen that way of course - and in some timetables the up road was actually booked to arrive first - so Reg 5 avoided it being held outside.
When both the Station and Junction Boxes at Worcester Shrub Hill were still in use they didn't half have some complicated working between the boxes.

Not only did they have Line Clear to Clearing Point Only and Reg 5, Shrub Hill Junction also had the special bell signal Line Clear to Down Inner Home Signal Only (2-3-2).

As well as that, Regulation 32 (Working in Wrong Direction) was authorised, and you could block back outside. The footnotes respecting Reg 32 went thus:

Quote:
If the Down Platform line or Down Middle line between this signal box and Shrub Hill Junction signal box is already occupied on the Shrub Hill Station side of the passenger footbridge, but is clear on the Shrub Hill Junction signal box side of the footbridge, the Working in Wrong Direction signal must not be acknowledged by repetition, but the special bell signal Line clear to the ground disc signal at fouling point with connection Down Middle line to Down Platform line in centre of Station (1-2-3) must be sent to Shrub Hill Junction if the line is clear to that ground signal.
With the same bell code also to be used on receipt of the signal Blocking Back Outside Home Signal when required.

Regulation 31 (Shunting Into Forward Section) was authorised.

And then there was this

Quote:
When vehicles are detached and left on the Up Platform line to the rear of the Shrub Hill station signal box Up Platform line Home signal, and it is necessary for a locomotive to enter the section at this signal box and propel the vehicles in the wrong direction to Shrub Hill Junction signal box, the special bell signal May locomotive propel to your signal box, vehicles now in section (1-2-4) must be sent to Shrub Hill Junction. When the locomotive and vehicles are clear of the section, the Shrub Hill Junction Signalman will send the special bell signal Vehicles propelled clear of section (3-2-1). The Signalman at this signal box, when satisfied that the section is clear, may, after acknowledging the special bell signal (3-2-1), send the Train out of Section signal to Shrub Hill Junction.
They certainly earned their money in those days.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Anothersignalman
Model railway signal box interior advice 16/12/2024 at 14:19 #159521
Anothersignalman
Avatar
114 posts
Thanks all, this has been a very interesting discussion.

It seems like we have a workable solution, of 24 lever frame plus 5 lever ground frame. With that said, I'm no longer certain that I am constrained to the originally-mentioned Peco signal box and station building, and since all the adjacent signals and scenery follow Australian HO scale practice I may end up reverting to the prototype I'm familiar with (in line with most of the rest of the layout).

To answer some of the outstanding elements:
• I wanted to avoid multiple signal box structures because the station is only worked by one person in practice.
• At the up end, there's a long section or short section, latter usually in use. At the down end, long section, short section rarely in use (but when it is, it provides a facing junction).
• The level crossing at up end, between the distant and arrival home signals, is unprotected except for signs. It serves an industry and associated employee cottages. Locally, those sorts of level crossings did sometimes have gates and home signals each way provided, but most of those were deleted around 1900-1910 to save on staffing costs and replaced with cattle grids. Many of these crossings, even on passenger lines, remained without active protection until only a few years ago, when we started increasing line speeds above 60-70mph and replacing locomotive-hauled trains with DMUs.
• Some parts of the club layout are approaching 50 years old, and there is archaeological evidence (e.g. holes in the chipboard, gaps in the wiring sequences) that the track layout has been altered over time. Bracket signal post 21 used to be immediately on the up end of the platform (therefore points 8 and 9 were probably a lot closer as well), and we recently discovered that points 17 used to be on the up side of points 16. This sort of loop extension project, with motorised points and either motorised or light signals would explain the lack of facing point locks at the up end, as well as things like the Annett locking of the dock platform, to free enough levers for other changes in lieu of providing a whole new signal box and frame.

Log in to reply