Page 1 of 1
| east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 12:43 #27538 | |
Wells
82 posts |
I know we have got king x and Pet simulators what about Doncaster and york very busy with freight and passenger services love the work people do on here. thankyou to all involved... Paul Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 12:45 #27541 | |
|
Zoe
254 posts |
" said:I know we have got king x and Pet simulators what about Doncaster and york very busy with freight and passenger services York is an IECC so a SimSig version can't be released. Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 12:49 #27542 | |
|
Wells
82 posts |
is Doncaster also an IECC.
Paul Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 13:25 #27546 | |
Peter Bennet
5402 posts |
Doncaster is not IECC so can be done, and it's a published fact that we intend to do it sometime, but no one is working on it at the moment. York IECC and Tyneside IECC can't be done; there are then three or four boxes north of Tyneside that could be done to connect to Edinburgh. I'm not aware of any plans to do them, though Edinburgh is coded to chain if they are. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 15:49 #27554 | |
|
Stephen Fulcher
2084 posts |
" said:Doncaster is not IECC so can be done, and it's a published fact that we intend to do it sometime, but no one is working on it at the moment.I am sure you would also agree if I were to suggest that Doncaster would be a very big, and therefore not a quick, job do to - it is a very big box. Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 17:30 #27561 | |
Steamer
3985 posts |
Stephen Fulcher said:I am sure you would also agree if I were to suggest that Doncaster would be a very big, and therefore not a quick, job do to - it is a very big box. See posts 3 and 8 on this thread to see how big! "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 20:02 #27567 | |
|
Class 92
359 posts |
" said:" said:Why is not possible to do York with it being a IECC.I know we have got king x and Pet simulators what about Doncaster and york very busy with freight and passenger services Last edited: 17/01/2012 at 20:03 by Class 92 Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 20:06 #27568 | |
|
john havenhand
58 posts |
would it be possible to do tyneside before it became an IECC?
Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 20:08 #27569 | |
|
AndyG
1842 posts |
" said:Why is not possible to do York with it being a IECC.Reasons fully explained in the "Read This first" heading at the top of this category. I can only help one person a day. Today's not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look too good either. Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 20:10 #27570 | |
Andrew G
552 posts |
" said:Doncaster is not IECC so can be done, and it's a published fact that we intend to do it sometime, but no one is working on it at the moment.Not sure that Tweedmouth, Alnmouth and Morpeth would make the most interesting of simulations. Lots of CCTV crossings and the occasional loop for regulating, although there is a bit more track work around Morpeth. Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 17/01/2012 at 20:46 #27577 | |
|
Peter Bennet
5402 posts |
" said:" said:Doncaster is not IECC so can be done, and it's a published fact that we intend to do it sometime, but no one is working on it at the moment.Not sure that Tweedmouth, Alnmouth and Morpeth would make the most interesting of simulations. Lots of CCTV crossings and the occasional loop for regulating, although there is a bit more track work around Morpeth. Yes I was working on the idea that any chained Sim would be "Newcastle" in a broad sense. " said: would it be possible to do tyneside before it became an IECC? Maybe but there is a big IF [we had the data] which we don't as far as I know. More likely we'd have to wait for Geoff to retire (OH and have the data)! Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 18/01/2012 at 14:42 #27678 | |
|
Wells
82 posts |
Doncaster would a nice one to have as is controls Grantham, newark north gate and retford and routes to Sheffield, Leeds, Hull. i think so any way and not forgetting to york. what about West Coast routes I know we have got loads now but some of them would be nice if done. Rugby, Watford,Birmingham New street, Midland Main Line: know we got Trent, Sheffield, there so many to name sorry just a few surgestions. Paul Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 18/01/2012 at 14:58 #27679 | |
jc92
3690 posts |
theoretically, when (or if) derby, leicester and west hamps are released its possible to run the whole MML with doncaster it would make partial sense to actually split the sim like with three bridges, possibly with a north and south sim due to the size. simililarly each workstation at york (Y, CF, L, S)could be represented as an individual sim each. church fenton might be a boring one though :P could yorks OCS panel layout not be simulated? most of the data is available and it would certainly be more interesting than the current layout "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
| Re: east coast routes 18/01/2012 at 15:16 #27680 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
" said:Doncaster would a nice one to have as is controls Grantham, newark north gate and retford and routes to Sheffield, Leeds, Hull. i think so any way and not forgetting to york.Rugby is a conflict of interest. It's a TREsim product. "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |