Upcoming Games

No games to display

Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

TT SFLD83v3 Tuesday, problem train

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Released > Sheffield (Obsolete .exe) > TT SFLD83v3 Tuesday, problem train

Page 1 of 1

TT SFLD83v3 Tuesday, problem train 20/02/2013 at 13:59 #41644
Charlytos
Avatar
268 posts
Train 1E62 runs to Sheffield 1B, divides to 5E62. 1E62 departure to Nummery line 3,23 and 5E62 departure to HS 3,35.
Problem is, than over 3,13 or 3,14 has entrance train 0M00X from HS siding to platform 1A, reverse and departure 3,18 from signal 101. Platform A is used on part by 0E62S which joins with 5E62. 0M00X cannot have entrance so.
I made changes to timetable over that problem. 1E62, after be divided, goes to signal 142 and reverse to platform 2 for its departure. Move 5E62 to 1B full and same to 0E62S making join. And then 0M00X has free platform 1A for its entrance. Question is, if that change is or isn't coherent on simulaton?...
...........
Problem with train 6E94A stopped on signal 81, direction Sheffield DPL, don't find that point. DPL line for my reason is from signal 77 until signal 81. That train only can use platforms 5 and 6 and UP siding 1 and 2 (all those are empty now), direction is to nummery line point.

Last edited: 20/02/2013 at 22:29 by Charlytos
Log in to reply
TT SFLD83v3 Tuesday, problem train 11/07/2014 at 19:58 #62681
Charlytos
Avatar
268 posts
Cannot edit previous message because is old. Has passed 1 1/2 year after of previous text and problem continues without be fixed.
Put details other time over this problem. Train 0E62S is stopped on shunt signal in front off of platform 1. 5E62 arrives to Sheffield 1B and divides, 1E62 departure to 3,23.
....................
Problem is, cannot couple 5E62 after be divided with 0E62S. Wait 1E62 departure, made smae proved join 5E62 and 0E62S but none of both trains stars join. I prove move one train and after the other, not getting join action. Ignore why is so the problem mentioned. Thanks.

Log in to reply