Page 1 of 1
| Bradford Junction 12/05/2015 at 23:10 #72134 | |
DaveHarries
1287 posts |
Hello all, I am currently working on a new TT for the Westbury sim: paralell TTs may follow for Bristol and Swindon simulations if I have the time to compile them. The scenario is that a line closure is in place between Bradford Junction and Bathampton Junction. Some trains in the TT I am working on will be using Trowbridge as a terminus point with the requirement to then reverse (as a 5xxx) at Bradford Junction and then head back to Trowbridge station. I realise this is possibly a silly question but, would the TT command "Bradford Jn (rev)" work if a train had to use the Melksham line to reverse? This would be the case with the TT I am working on as there is no other means of doing the reversal. Cheers, Dave Log in to reply |
| Bradford Junction 12/05/2015 at 23:22 #72135 | |
postal
5269 posts |
" said:Hello all,You could always write a 1 train test TT and try it yourself to see if it works. That might be a bit quicker than waiting for a response here! “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
| Bradford Junction 13/05/2015 at 07:18 #72142 | |
Steamer
3997 posts |
It won't, the location is intended for reversing trains behind 119/219. I don't think there's a way to do it, it won't accept Melksham as a reversing point either.
"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
| Bradford Junction 13/05/2015 at 08:49 #72143 | |
AndyG
1842 posts |
Trowbridge-Bradford Jn (rev)-Trowbridge validates OK, so it's possible to TT the move within these provisos:- a) TT analyser reports Trowbridge as not a sensible location for activities & not an end key location but the TT will work OK; b) you may well have to to manually reverse the train behind W88 (and step up the TT?). Edit: Can be made to work, but train stops & reverses at W119, needs TT bandon, rev dir, reinstate TT etc. What will work is to TT the 5Xnn as Trwobridge-Thingley Jn-Trowbridge, and manually reverse once behind W88 and step up TT. I can only help one person a day. Today's not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look too good either. Last edited: 13/05/2015 at 09:09 by AndyG Reason: update Log in to reply The following user said thank you: JamesN |
| Bradford Junction 13/05/2015 at 10:33 #72145 | |
|
DaveHarries
1287 posts |
Just tried it on a trial TT and you are right: no go. But someone somewhere obviously has a way of doing it..... http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/V52165/2015/08/05/advanced .....but bearing in mind that the line from Bradford Junction to Bath Spa will be shut I wonder how they will manage it during the closure? The Melksham line signal may well be the way they do it. Rather scuppers my plans to create a TT for the period during the closure -  - but I may give Andy's idea a go. If you manually changed the points, however, and then moved it onto the Melksham branch by telling it to shunt forward would it automatically stop at W88?Dave Last edited: 13/05/2015 at 10:35 by DaveHarries Log in to reply |
| Bradford Junction 13/05/2015 at 10:38 #72146 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
" said:Just tried it on a trial TT and you are right: no go. But someone somewhere obviously has a way of doing it.....I've logged a feature request for a reverse location at Signal 88 which is where these moves take place (13322). No promises though. "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply The following user said thank you: DaveHarries |
| Bradford Junction 29/11/2016 at 23:17 #89594 | |
|
tomsmith27
8 posts |
Apologies for dragging up an old(ish) thread. Did the feature request ever come to light or are there any plans? I appreciate that this may not be possible due to more important matters! Regards Tom Log in to reply |
| Bradford Junction 29/11/2016 at 23:58 #89595 | |
|
DaveHarries
1287 posts |
AFAIK no. Unfortunately I have since managed to accidentally delete the timetable as well which was hugely annoying. I had been looking forward to releasing it. Dave Last edited: 29/11/2016 at 23:58 by DaveHarries Reason: Expansion of post. Log in to reply |
| Bradford Junction 30/11/2016 at 00:25 #89596 | |
GeoffM
6380 posts |
headshot119 in post 72146 said:I've logged a feature request for a reverse location at Signal 88 which is where these moves take place (13322). No promises though.This is still showing as unresolved I'm afraid. I know Peter Bennet and Howard Potter both had dealings with this sim so hopefully one will see this and respond. SimSig Boss Log in to reply |
| Bradford Junction 30/11/2016 at 22:15 #89610 | |
Peter Bennet
5419 posts 
|
GeoffM in post 89596 said:headshot119 in post 72146 said:Looks like there are a few issues reported still to be looked into. Ideally, I'd like to do with it what I did with Exeter but that's for another day. For various reasons, SimSig has taken a bit of a back seat at the moment.I've logged a feature request for a reverse location at Signal 88 which is where these moves take place (13322). No promises though.This is still showing as unresolved I'm afraid. I know Peter Bennet and Howard Potter both had dealings with this sim so hopefully one will see this and respond. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply The following user said thank you: tomsmith27 |