Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Thanks - and a possible bug....!

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Released > Huddersfield > Thanks - and a possible bug....!

Page 1 of 2

Thanks - and a possible bug....! 05/08/2015 at 20:19 #74796
DaveHarries
Avatar
1285 posts
Hi,

Firstly thanks for the release of Huddersfield. Good to have another one-player sim to practice on when no sessions are going. Surprisingly busy as you say and well done to all involved with the writing and testing of this sim.

One point though. When routing 5B61 I realised I had set a wrong route so I cancelled the route set from signal 774, thereby ACOA'ing the train. However after the route had cancelled I set the correct route - but the driver of 5B61 failed to ring in to report the ACOA.

Surely he should have done so?

Dave

Last edited: 05/08/2015 at 20:19 by DaveHarries
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 05/08/2015 at 21:20 #74797
GeoffM
Avatar
6376 posts
There is a bit of intelligence built in - if the driver was beyond the sighting distance for the signal, and didn't get an unexpected aspect (eg green last signal, red this signal), then he'll be blissfully unaware of what you did.
SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: DaveHarries, ozrail
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 05/08/2015 at 21:22 #74798
DaveHarries
Avatar
1285 posts
Cheers Geoff. Often thought it was about time something like that became possible.

Dave

Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 05/08/2015 at 21:29 #74799
2W34
Avatar
58 posts
I would also like to express my thanks to Geoff and the developers. Very nice to finally have a West Yorkshire sim!
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 06/08/2015 at 10:50 #74813
Muzer
Avatar
718 posts
I'll second these thanks! I know what I'll be doing after work today...
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 06/08/2015 at 15:42 #74821
pedroathome
Avatar
915 posts
Just playing around before possibly buying the sim, Don't know if its intentional or not, but its possible to reverse 2228 points while a route is set from shunt signal 1412, causing said signal to revert to danger. Suspect these points should be locked, but aren't once called when routing into Platform 4, 5 or 6
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 06/08/2015 at 16:18 #74822
GeoffM
Avatar
6376 posts
" said:
Just playing around before possibly buying the sim, Don't know if its intentional or not, but its possible to reverse 2228 points while a route is set from shunt signal 1412, causing said signal to revert to danger. Suspect these points should be locked, but aren't once called when routing into Platform 4, 5 or 6
Thanks, reported.

SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 06/08/2015 at 22:08 #74837
Muzer
Avatar
718 posts
Who is the dev, out of interest?
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 06/08/2015 at 22:47 #74838
GeoffM
Avatar
6376 posts
" said:
Who is the dev, out of interest?
Noel Young.

SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 07/08/2015 at 09:57 #74848
LucasLCC
Avatar
94 posts
Having my usual mess around, seems that the TD's at Penistone behave erratically. If you have several trains enter in quick succession they overwrite the TD that is already there, despite the first train not moving.
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 08/08/2015 at 03:04 #74887
jc92
Avatar
3685 posts
I'm finding trains using Call ons in P4 are deleting the TD's for berth trains and replacing with their own, rather than pushing the existing TD to the rear berth and occupying the front berth.
"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 08/08/2015 at 14:31 #74905
Noisynoel
Avatar
989 posts
" said:
Having my usual mess around, seems that the TD's at Penistone behave erratically. If you have several trains enter in quick succession they overwrite the TD that is already there, despite the first train not moving.
Hmm, you should not be able to enter trains in quick succession. I'll have a look once I've unpacked from my holibobs

Noisynoel
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 09/08/2015 at 18:03 #74941
jc92
Avatar
3685 posts
I've also noticed at huddersfield TD's dont drop off if the related TC empties like they do on other sims. so for instance 2z00 arrives in P4 and its TD steps to HU763. i input 2Z01 as a TD at HU764. when 2Z01 departs its TD steps but 2Z00 remains at HU763's Berth.
"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 09/08/2015 at 18:31 #74942
jc92
Avatar
3685 posts
HU770 will not clear into P5.

appears to be a one off. I can't replicate it.

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Last edited: 09/08/2015 at 18:32 by jc92
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 10/08/2015 at 20:14 #74980
NCC1701
Avatar
129 posts
Possible overlap bug on signal 704, just below the Marsden GF controls on the diagram.

In my screen grab 2M61 has not quite cleared the overlap, still on track sircuit TAF, but the stop signal in rear, 716, has cleared when track circuit TAGA has become unoccupied - this being the track circuit the signal is drawn above.


Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Signalman Exeter West & Llangollen
Last edited: 10/08/2015 at 20:15 by NCC1701
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 10/08/2015 at 20:20 #74981
NCC1701
Avatar
129 posts
Also noted: DE2 clears to green as soon as a train in advance has passed the next signal, SE112, as if a repeater for the latter is missing from the sim.
Signalman Exeter West & Llangollen
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 10/08/2015 at 22:48 #74985
Noisynoel
Avatar
989 posts
" said:
Possible overlap bug on signal 704, just below the Marsden GF controls on the diagram.

In my screen grab 2M61 has not quite cleared the overlap, still on track sircuit TAF, but the stop signal in rear, 716, has cleared when track circuit TAGA has become unoccupied - this being the track circuit the signal is drawn above.

I can't recreate tis or find anything that would cause it to happen.

" said:
Also noted: DE2 clears to green as soon as a train in advance has passed the next signal, SE112, as if a repeater for the latter is missing from the sim.
Fixed

Noisynoel
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 10/08/2015 at 22:51 #74986
Noisynoel
Avatar
989 posts
Both fixed
Noisynoel
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: NCC1701
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 23/08/2015 at 19:31 #75396
NCC1701
Avatar
129 posts
Found another one, now that I've reached 2300 in the timetable. 2B94 from the Down Branch is scheduled to join on P4 with 2E86 which is already in the platform. However, setting the call on route from HU753 to HU763 neither the running shunt 1411 (in the tunnel on the Up Main) nor 753's subsidiary clear for the route. Had to talk 2B94 past both signals.



Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Signalman Exeter West & Llangollen
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 24/08/2015 at 08:02 #75399
GW43125
Avatar
495 posts
" said:
Found another one, now that I've reached 2300 in the timetable. 2B94 from the Down Branch is scheduled to join on P4 with 2E86 which is already in the platform. However, setting the call on route from HU753 to HU763 neither the running shunt 1411 (in the tunnel on the Up Main) nor 753's subsidiary clear for the route. Had to talk 2B94 past both signals.


Looks like it's because both track circuits are occupied. Has the train moved right down?

Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 24/08/2015 at 08:29 #75401
Noisynoel
Avatar
989 posts
Everything reported so far has been fixed. As soon as work gives me a chance to be around at the same time as Geoff I'll ask him to send the update out to the loader
Noisynoel
Last edited: 24/08/2015 at 08:30 by Noisynoel
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 24/08/2015 at 10:48 #75410
tjtbcork
Avatar
75 posts
If the route was set to the yellow arrow at 763 then 753 won't clear as thats a warner route not a call on route. The full route needs set for 753 to clear.

Tim

Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 24/08/2015 at 11:22 #75412
Steamer
Avatar
3984 posts
" said:
If the route was set to the yellow arrow at 763 then 753 won't clear as thats a warner route not a call on route. The full route needs set for 753 to clear.

Tim
That's correct, however the situation in the picture is a bit more complicated than that.

The call-on route from 753 won't clear if the track circuit in platform 4 closest to 764 is occupied. This could have been deliberately designed into the interlocking to reduce the chance of the back of the arriving train overhanging 764 and blocking the junction. If so, the stopping position of 2E86 needs adjusting so that it occupies the far track circuit only. Alternatively, it could be a simulation error and the call-on should clear with either TC occupied. Presumably, Noel will know which one is the case.

"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q)
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 24/08/2015 at 13:01 #75417
NCC1701
Avatar
129 posts
" said:
If the route was set to the yellow arrow at 763 then 753 won't clear as thats a warner route not a call on route. The full route needs set for 753 to clear.

Tim
It's not set to the warner, though I did try that as well. It is set to the "full route", i.e. signal to signal.

Signalman Exeter West & Llangollen
Log in to reply
Thanks - and a possible bug....! 24/08/2015 at 13:04 #75418
NCC1701
Avatar
129 posts
" said:
" said:
If the route was set to the yellow arrow at 763 then 753 won't clear as thats a warner route not a call on route. The full route needs set for 753 to clear.

Tim
That's correct, however the situation in the picture is a bit more complicated than that.

The call-on route from 753 won't clear if the track circuit in platform 4 closest to 764 is occupied. This could have been deliberately designed into the interlocking to reduce the chance of the back of the arriving train overhanging 764 and blocking the junction. If so, the stopping position of 2E86 needs adjusting so that it occupies the far track circuit only. Alternatively, it could be a simulation error and the call-on should clear with either TC occupied. Presumably, Noel will know which one is the case.
2E86 was far enough down that 2B94 did fit in behind when I talked him past. Neither train is very long as you can see.

Signalman Exeter West & Llangollen
Log in to reply