Page 1 of 1
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 08/03/2017 at 01:45 #93556 | |
P*Funk
34 posts |
I can't set a route into the UGL at Oxenholme. If I set CE52 into CE62 then trying to set CE52 into CE42 says no overlap available. If I do it in reverse, setting into the loop first then try to hook up CE62 to CE52 it says locked reverse by another route. Just checking if this is a bug or something I'm not doing properly, though I can't see how. Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 08/03/2017 at 09:32 #93560 | |
postal
5264 posts |
P*Funk in post 93556 said:I can't set a route into the UGL at Oxenholme. If I set CE52 into CE62 then trying to set CE52 into CE42 says no overlap available. If I do it in reverse, setting into the loop first then try to hook up CE62 to CE52 it says locked reverse by another route.You have to run the train up to CE52, wait for the overlap for CE62 (which extends beyond CE52) to drop out and then signal the train into the loop. There is a timeout so the overlap from CE62 doesn't drop out as soon as the signal is replaced to R. You have to hold the train at CE52 while the timeout runs down before you set the route to CE42. Post has attachments. Log in to view them. “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Last edited: 08/03/2017 at 10:41 by postal Reason: . Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 09/03/2017 at 19:01 #93574 | |
TomOF
452 posts |
Here's the 2016 layout. Coming soon to a loader near you. Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Log in to reply The following users said thank you: HST125Scorton, RainbowNines, Steamer, ledgero2, bfcmik, Vortexhaha |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 09/03/2017 at 19:16 #93576 | |
GeoffM
6376 posts |
TomOF in post 93574 said:Here's the 2016 layout. Coming soon to a loader near you.Can the boss say "when will it be ready?"? SimSig Boss Log in to reply The following users said thank you: Vortexhaha, JamesN, headshot119 |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 09/03/2017 at 19:17 #93577 | |
KymriskaDraken
963 posts |
GeoffM in post 93576 said:TomOF in post 93574 said:All together now: It'll be ready when it's ready :DHere's the 2016 layout. Coming soon to a loader near you.Can the boss say "when will it be ready?"? Kev Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 09/03/2017 at 23:06 #93579 | |
RainbowNines
272 posts |
TomOF in post 93574 said:Coming soonMy right index finger has started twitching in anticipation of setting all those 1980s routes! Last edited: 09/03/2017 at 23:07 by RainbowNines Reason: Missed a bit! Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 09/03/2017 at 23:43 #93582 | |
madaboutrains
316 posts |
TomOF in post 93574 said:Here's the 2016 layout. Coming soon to a loader near you.Worth noting there is a banner repeater on the approach to CE52 aswell. Here it is on the signal box panel diagram: Post has attachments. Log in to view them. RIP Feltham Panel 1 Log in to reply The following user said thank you: HST125Scorton |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 10/03/2017 at 13:41 #93590 | |
P*Funk
34 posts |
Ah of course its obvious now. Obviously without a train to experiment with I wouldn't see that fiddling with it. Now for future reference whenever you revisit the manual, whoever is in charge of that, this would be something worth having in there. I've read the manual many times and I'm virtually certain its not mentioned. Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 12/03/2017 at 21:09 #93624 | |
Danny252
1461 posts |
P*Funk in post 93590 said:Now for future reference whenever you revisit the manual, whoever is in charge of thatGiven that it's editable by anyone, you can nominate yourself to be in charge of that change! Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 12/03/2017 at 21:30 #93625 | |
AndyG
1842 posts |
P*Funk in post 93590 said:Now for future reference whenever you revisit the manual, whoever is in charge of that, this would be something worth having in there. I've read the manual many times and I'm virtually certain its not mentioned.Like this Wait for Overlap? I can only help one person a day. Today's not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look too good either. Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 12/03/2017 at 22:13 #93626 | |
RainbowNines
272 posts |
There's no reference in the Carlisle manual to that page, nor does that page mention Oxenholme. Edit: I've now edited that page so it does include this example - there's at least one more on Carlisle that I can't think of off the top of my head. Edit 2: For the sake of completeness, I've added it to the sim manual too. Last edited: 12/03/2017 at 22:23 by RainbowNines Reason: Edit Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 14/03/2017 at 13:18 #93637 | |
P*Funk
34 posts |
I just saw the edit. I forgot that the manuals were public wiki but being still rather novice around here I'm reluctant to put my mark on the official documentation anyway.
Last edited: 14/03/2017 at 13:19 by P*Funk Reason: word Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 15/03/2017 at 19:36 #93648 | |
GW43125
495 posts |
P*Funk in post 93637 said:I just saw the edit. I forgot that the manuals were public wiki but being still rather novice around here I'm reluctant to put my mark on the official documentation anyway.Don't be afraid. Go ahead and if the devs aren't happy with it they'll soon roll it back (I found this out the hard way...) Log in to reply |
Oxenholme UGL can't be set 20/03/2017 at 12:56 #93912 | |
HST125Scorton
1191 posts |
While I've not had an issue with Oxenholme UGL. I'm glad to see a sneaky preview of a screenshot Tom uploaded of the 2016 era when Oxenholme was remodelled to allow Windermere bound trains to arrive a little faster instead of the slow arrival. I'm really looking forward to the release and have a planned to do a new timetable hopefully a 4-Day timetable From Monday through to Thursday or Friday to Monday this will see a variety of freight traffic and the regular passenger and sleepers. Soon been soon looking forward to the release. Aaron (AJRO) | Timetable Writer Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Vortexhaha |