Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

Jsun, postal, Person82, waucott, Hap (5 users seen recently)

Cambridge 2006 SO V2 beta

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Timetables > Cambridge > Cambridge 2006 SO V2 beta

Page 1 of 1

Cambridge 2006 SO V2 beta 12/10/2009 at 16:56 #33
postal
Avatar
5264 posts
Online
Originally submitted by Rushey_platt.

Here is my Saturday timetable for Cambridge, based on the current service. It also includes some diverted freight for added interest.

Please post comments, errors, etc. in the "Timetable Comments and Questions" section.

Rushey

“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe
Log in to reply
Cambridge 2006 SO V2 beta 12/10/2009 at 16:56 #3509
postal
Avatar
5264 posts
Online
Originally submitted by Rushey_platt.

Here is my Saturday timetable for Cambridge, based on the current service. It also includes some diverted freight for added interest.

Please post comments, errors, etc. in the "Timetable Comments and Questions" section.

Rushey

“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe
Log in to reply
Cambridge 2006 SO V2 beta 13/10/2009 at 19:19 #3615
postal
Avatar
5264 posts
Online
Comments extracted from old Forum:

Colchester_dean
Crossing box keeper
Username: Colchester_dean

Post Number: 16
Registered: 10-2005

Posted on Tuesday, 09 May, 2006 - 10:07 am:

1C68 should probably be a 365.
5C68 comes in as a 365, forms 1C68 at Cambridge, which is listed as a 317.

Same for 1C89 and 1C69.

(Message edited by colchester_dean on May 09, 2006)

...oOo...


Broodje
Area signalling manager
Username: Broodje

Post Number: 405
Registered: 8-2004

Posted on Friday, 09 June, 2006 - 12:34 pm:

sorry, I didn't have time to play your timetable until now. I think your timetable would improve a lot if you made rules for the freight trains that stop at Cambridge goods. I did it and it makes it a bid harder to manage Cambridge when a train stops there for 40 minutes.
Another note: You can't join a loco at the goods lines so I changed 4z97 and 4z88 to stop at the reception lines as they are empty anyway. Oh and 4z97-1 missed its next train working (4z97-2).

...oOo...


Peterbennet
Moderator
Username: Peterbennet

Post Number: 1040
Registered: 5-2004

Posted on Friday, 09 June, 2006 - 01:49 pm:

Broodje,

You can join locos to trains on the goods lines: that's what the triangles are for. They are only enabled when the relevant TC is occupied so you can't send trains wrong line through the Goods Loops.

Peter

TOCGAME: Online multiplayer train management game: free to join and play. http://koti.mbnet.fi/tocgame

...oOo...


Broodje
Area signalling manager
Username: Broodje

Post Number: 406
Registered: 8-2004

Posted on Friday, 09 June, 2006 - 02:17 pm:

lol, or actualy; Doh!
The stupid thing is that it is in the manual, so I should have known better :o.

...oOo...


Broodje
Area signalling manager
Username: Broodje

Post Number: 409
Registered: 8-2004

Posted on Friday, 09 June, 2006 - 07:57 pm:

I found another small error: under train types the 'EMU 356x8' is 80meters while the 'EMU 356x4' is also 80meters long. I think the first one should be 160 meters?

...oOo...


Rushey_platt
Area signalling manager
Username: Rushey_platt

Post Number: 270
Registered: 6-2004

Posted on Saturday, 10 June, 2006 - 09:41 pm:

Re the freight train dwell times, I don't think forcing the trains to wait for their alloted pathing time would be realistic, esp as these are scratch paths (unvalidated).

IRL the train would buzz out if crewed up, and the siggie would either run it early or hold it to time as he/she saw fit.

Thanks for pointing the errors out. I'll update and post a new version when I get round to it!

Rushey

...oOo...


Broodje
Area signalling manager
Username: Broodje

Post Number: 411
Registered: 8-2004

Posted on Saturday, 10 June, 2006 - 09:55 pm:

ah yes you have a point there, I do think that a driver swap would take some time though?

...oOo...


Peterbennet
Moderator
Username: Peterbennet

Post Number: 1041
Registered: 5-2004

Posted on Saturday, 10 June, 2006 - 10:50 pm:

What I tend to do is look at the times and if it is shown as 2 mins then that is probably a crew change so I give it (say) 1.5 mins hold. If its longer it maybe loading/unloading so I give it a longer hold (say) 5 mins less than shown- depends. It's really just the pathing stops that give the difficulty.

Peter

TOCGAME: Online multiplayer train management game: free to join and play. http://koti.mbnet.fi/tocgame

...oOo...


Broodje
Area signalling manager
Username: Broodje

Post Number: 412
Registered: 8-2004

Posted on Saturday, 10 June, 2006 - 11:35 pm:

well the timings for these trains are between 10 minutes and 50 minutes, but as they are all deverted trains they won't be loaded/unloaded. (would any train be loaded at camebridge these days anyway?).

A driver change does take 2 minutes if the new driver is standing ready, so I guess if the train is expected to wait for 50 minutes the driver won't arive at the moment the train arives at cambridge.

Anyway I have been playing around a bit with your timetable Rushey I added a few shunt moves and reapeared the reported mistakes, shall I send it to you? or should I keep it for myself?

“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe
Log in to reply
Cambridge 2006 SO V2 beta 05/03/2014 at 00:54 #56551
Trainfan344
Avatar
262 posts
I know this topic has been dormant for some time, but having been playing this, I have 1L29 and 5K96 booked to join in platform 6 at cambridge, however, when I signal 5K96 into platform 6, it refuses to couple to 1L29, is this a timetabling error or am I missing something?
Log in to reply
Cambridge 2006 SO V2 beta 05/03/2014 at 19:06 #56584
Lardybiker
Avatar
771 posts
Maybe neither...

Just because two trains occupy the same platform does not necessarily mean they are meant to join together. In SimSig for that to happen, the timetable of both trains has to specifically state for each train that a join will take place at that particular location with the other train.

If you check the timetable of both trains, if both have further locations beyond P6 at Cambridge *AND* there is no Join action in P6, then the trains were never meant to join and should run separately.

Log in to reply
Cambridge 2006 SO V2 beta 06/03/2014 at 00:32 #56598
Trainfan344
Avatar
262 posts
I managed to get them to couple earlier, had to shunt 5K96 to the signal and then make 1L29 shunt forwards and they coupled, they were booked to couple and form 1K96
Log in to reply