Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

jem771, zandoodle, flymo, Person82, BenWright, Cheapside, Andrew G (7 users seen recently)

Paid and free version compatibility

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Released > Edinburgh > Paid and free version compatibility

Page 1 of 1

Paid and free version compatibility 22/12/2012 at 11:04 #39526
KymriskaDraken
Avatar
963 posts
If I host an Edinburgh session running the paid version, will people with the free version be able to connect, or would we all need to have the same version? Similarly will the paid version work in client mode to a free version host?


Kev

Log in to reply
Paid and free version compatibility 22/12/2012 at 11:25 #39529
jc92
Avatar
3690 posts
" said:
If I host an Edinburgh session running the paid version, will people with the free version be able to connect, or would we all need to have the same version? Similarly will the paid version work in client mode to a free version host?


Kev
dont think so, just like when any new updated version is issued, it isnt compatible with the last one

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: KymriskaDraken
Paid and free version compatibility 22/12/2012 at 11:56 #39531
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5402 posts
I'm not sure if, as a matter of course, version numbers are checked against each other when attempting chaining. However, as a matter of fact there is different functionality between these specific versions which will at best cause some mismatch. Exactly what will happen I don't know as I've not tried it. Also I don't know what will happen if you try and chain old Edinburgh with new NEscot (for example), save that the chaining code within the core-code was overhauled requiring some rewriting of some (but not all) of the links.

So all I can say is try it and see but don't expect it to work.

Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: KymriskaDraken
Paid and free version compatibility 22/12/2012 at 12:04 #39532
KymriskaDraken
Avatar
963 posts
" said:
I'm not sure if, as a matter of course, version numbers are checked against each other when attempting chaining. However, as a matter of fact there is different functionality between these specific versions which will at best cause some mismatch. Exactly what will happen I don't know as I've not tried it. Also I don't know what will happen if you try and chain old Edinburgh with new NEscot (for example), save that the chaining code within the core-code was overhauled requiring some rewriting of some (but not all) of the links.

So all I can say is try it and see but don't expect it to work.

Peter
I didn't particularly mean chaining - I was thinking more of a standard host/client set-up on the one sim.

Log in to reply
Paid and free version compatibility 22/12/2012 at 13:20 #39534
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5402 posts
" said:
" said:
I'm not sure if, as a matter of course, version numbers are checked against each other when attempting chaining. However, as a matter of fact there is different functionality between these specific versions which will at best cause some mismatch. Exactly what will happen I don't know as I've not tried it. Also I don't know what will happen if you try and chain old Edinburgh with new NEscot (for example), save that the chaining code within the core-code was overhauled requiring some rewriting of some (but not all) of the links.

So all I can say is try it and see but don't expect it to work.

Peter
I didn't particularly mean chaining - I was thinking more of a standard host/client set-up on the one sim.
Sorry, the first bit I meant multiplay (linking) not chaining: chaining is the "also" bit.

Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: KymriskaDraken
Paid and free version compatibility 22/12/2012 at 14:18 #39535
KymriskaDraken
Avatar
963 posts
I think I will have to play with it and see what works, and what doesn't.
Log in to reply