Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

jem771, waucott, Kage, uboat, Person82, BenWright (6 users seen recently)

1984 Timetable released

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Released > Motherwell > 1984 Timetable released

Page 2 of 2

1984 Timetable released 21/01/2016 at 00:02 #80014
bill_gensheet
Avatar
1414 posts
It could be a difficulty level thing, but I had generally found that once a freight has 'decided' to run early (eg call from a loop) that it continued to do so.
As far as loco to Motherwell goes, I did not think that it would always be the incoming crew to take the loco to ML. It will be for trips but not longer distances.

Lanark trip could be different as it is several different trains linked in rules. Let me know of any real killers to fix though (pretty sure all the 0Qxx trains of T58 & T59 are OK, they need to be).

regards
Bill

Log in to reply
1984 Timetable released 21/01/2016 at 10:16 #80022
Andrew G
Avatar
552 posts
" said:
Let me know of any real killers to fix though.

Thanks - I'll keep my eye out next time I host a full run through of the WTT.

Log in to reply
1984 Timetable released 21/01/2016 at 11:17 #80023
Splodge
Avatar
720 posts
One issue I'm having - getting a train into Wishaw Oil. I've set the route and released the frame on the panel, but no matter how long I wait I can't actually move any of the frame controls.
There's the right way, the wrong way and the railway.
Log in to reply
1984 Timetable released 21/01/2016 at 14:37 #80027
Danny252
Avatar
1461 posts
Mildly confusingly, the ground frame is named "Shieldmuir South GF". Wishaw GF refers to the one adjacent to Wishaw station. Looking at the manual, there doesn't seem to be much pattern as to whether names in the sim matches the "Ground Frame" column or the "Locations" column - Shieldmuir South takes the Location name, but Carfin BOC takes the Ground Frame name. Is the first column meant to match the sim?
Last edited: 21/01/2016 at 14:42 by Danny252
Log in to reply