Page 2 of 2
| Tyneside IECC 29/08/2016 at 13:34 #84400 | |
postal
5264 posts 
|
" said:I think a handy optional feature might be a train approaching X level crossing message. Its easy to get distracted on the other side of the panel and bring a class one to a halt.If the tales are to be believed, the lack of warning is just as problematic in the real box (my post above of 27/08/16 09:39). “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 31/08/2016 at 18:42 #84439 | |
chrisdmadd
242 posts |
" said:Are the west end bays at Newcastle permissive? Sectional Appendix says yes, but I've got a train at 483 with a route set into (occupied) P12 and the subsidiary won't clear?Certainly are, have you checked lengths? Not sure if it would detect that but you wont get anything more than 1x 185 1x 4 car 220 in there. You will get a few northern units in there 3 max im guessing. On a general note this is 'my patch!' Currently driving trains all over this sim so very pleased to see this released :silly: Last edited: 31/08/2016 at 21:49 by chrisdmadd Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 01/09/2016 at 20:50 #84454 | |
|
AndyG
1842 posts |
Geographical map of the Tyneside IECC area, which I've added to the manual reference section. [attachment=3946]SimSigMapTyneside.pdf[/attachment] Post has attachments. Log in to view them. I can only help one person a day. Today's not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look too good either. Log in to reply The following user said thank you: BarryM |
| Shouldn't ARS lower the barriers? 27/07/2018 at 13:07 #110420 | |
bugsy
1766 posts
|
GeoffM in post 84325 said:" said:I've noticed that Hett Mill, Killingworth and Dam Dykes level crossings need to be lowered manually while East Boldon is lowered by the ARS. Is this normal?Actually just crossing logic rather than ARS but yes, East Boldon has auto lower while the others don't. East Bolden Crossing. I’m currently playing the Tyneside IECC sim 15-10-09 (0000 start), Loader 4.7 and thought that I would give my brain a rest and read through some of the Forum posts to see what others were reporting. I came across this post (above) which is from August 2016, so something might have changed since then, but I have found that on some occasions, quite a few actually, ARS isn’t lowering the barriers and if my attention is elsewhere trying to sort out problems caused by delayed trains, I get phone calls about trains waiting at the approach signals. Is anyone else experiencing this? Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate. Last edited: 27/07/2018 at 13:54 by bugsy Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 27/07/2018 at 14:03 #110422 | |
|
bugsy
1766 posts
|
Here is an example Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate. Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 27/07/2018 at 14:44 #110423 | |
|
bugsy
1766 posts
|
Can anyone see anything odd here? Or have I gone completely mad (again) Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate. Last edited: 27/07/2018 at 14:47 by bugsy Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 27/07/2018 at 15:02 #110424 | |
Steamer
3984 posts
|
Bugsy said:Can anyone see anything odd here?Did you click on the headcode before the train actually entered the simulation? If so, the simulation won't necessarily show you the correct timetable. If you click on it now (as the train has entered the simulation) it should show the correct TT. "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 27/07/2018 at 17:00 #110428 | |
|
bugsy
1766 posts
|
You are right, I did click on it. I have just clicked on it again and the correct timetable has opened as you explained. I'm not going mad after all. Thanks. Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate. Last edited: 27/07/2018 at 17:01 by bugsy Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 26/03/2019 at 11:17 #116778 | |
tynie123
234 posts |
Has anybody had issues with Joining trains at Newcastle Central , Platform 7? 2W76 and 5A60 sit there and the train lists says waiting for joining train...had it with another service as well..
Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 26/03/2019 at 12:46 #116786 | |
|
JamesN
1607 posts |
Save game?
Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 26/03/2019 at 16:13 #116798 | |
|
tynie123
234 posts |
JamesN in post 116786 said:Save game?In the end I instructed the train at the rear to shunt forward. Problem solved. Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 26/03/2019 at 23:48 #116819 | |
Hap
1039 posts |
At what time was this join at? I have a couple of saves for Tyneside throughout the day
How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 27/03/2019 at 12:43 #116829 | |
|
tynie123
234 posts |
Hap in post 116819 said:At what time was this join at? I have a couple of saves for Tyneside throughout the day It is 5A60 AND 2W56 JOIN 20:50. I did move 5A60 forward and they did join, but I subsequently found out I locked the subroute. I happened earlier in the service as well. Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 12/05/2019 at 18:22 #118240 | |
|
tynie123
234 posts |
I love this sim, one of my favs. I play with a fairly high chance of delays . But they seem to me disproportionally high on the Metro. Fitters required etc, compared to the ECML. Is this something that is coded or just my bad luck. Still one of the best.
Log in to reply |
| Tyneside IECC 12/05/2019 at 18:59 #118241 | |
|
Jan
906 posts |
Probably because in-sim train delays can only happen at timetabled stops at the moment, so stopping trains will be disproportionally affected.
Two million people attempt to use Birmingham's magnificent rail network every year, with just over a million of them managing to get further than Smethwick. Log in to reply The following user said thank you: tynie123 |