Page 5 of 5
| Tyneside Bugs 11/09/2016 at 14:15 #84711 | |
ajax103
1120 posts |
" said:" said:Version 1.1 so the same as you in any case I just ignored it and put the ARS back on for that service - just thought I say something as it was unusual.Question is a Class 142 cleared between Sunderland and South Hylton at all as I was under the impression that only Metro rolling stock was cleared - only reason I ask is because I just had 2N18 10:45 Hexham - Middlesbrough (NT 2/142) approaching Signal 6222 and the ARS stated the wrong route was chosen so the train went Non ARS.Which version of the simulation are you using? Tested in 1.1 and cannot reproduce. 142s haven't been considered for clearance on that route according to the Sectional Appendix, and in any case non-Metro trains are generally prohibited from the branch. Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Bugs 12/09/2016 at 09:11 #84763 | |
Giantray
347 posts |
" said:Or just shunt the wagons forward while the loco is separate. I have sent a query to NR over this train because TRUST says it's too long for the loop (and loop length verified by Google Earth and scheme plans). I suspect the answer is something like "yes it does hang out when running around, and this* is how we deal with it". * being an answer I hope to receive. I just started the train from ahead of the signal. The train rings in at departure time requesting authorisation to move. I suspect in real life, the runround is done and if foul of the main line, the train is started ahead of the signal. If the train is early or late, then delays to other trains will occur. Professionalism mean nothing around a bunch of Amateur wannabees! Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Bugs 12/09/2016 at 09:41 #84764 | |
Noisynoel
989 posts |
" said:" said:It's booked to sit there an hour and a half and wouldn't foul the main line that long. Run Round and push the wagons back in, works and is legal and safer than starting aheadOr just shunt the wagons forward while the loco is separate. I have sent a query to NR over this train because TRUST says it's too long for the loop (and loop length verified by Google Earth and scheme plans). I suspect the answer is something like "yes it does hang out when running around, and this* is how we deal with it". * being an answer I hope to receive. Noisynoel Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Bugs 12/09/2016 at 12:43 #84767 | |
postal
5264 posts 
|
As another option, is it possible to set the stopping position at FX@-nn so that the train pulls past the signal to stop, allowing space at the other end to rejoin?
“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Bugs 12/09/2016 at 12:50 #84768 | |
|
AndyG
1842 posts |
" said:As another option, is it possible to set the stopping position at FX@-nn so that the train pulls past the signal to stop, allowing space at the other end to rejoin?Have just tested, and it works, is to set it to NX+24m and clear the loop exit signal to allow the train to pull forward enough to allow space at the rear for rejoining loco (21m); NX+23m also works, but loco foul whilst joining and then sneaks in. (Did it that way vice FX as actual loop length not known) I can only help one person a day. Today's not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look too good either. Last edited: 13/09/2016 at 16:33 by AndyG Reason: typos Log in to reply The following user said thank you: postal |
| Tyneside Bugs 13/09/2016 at 16:15 #84801 | |
|
Class 92
359 posts |
Not sure if this has been mentioned but 2N24 arrives at Newcastle at 12:56 and forms 5W64 which is due to leave at 12:04? Should the ECS depart at 13:04 instead?
Log in to reply The following user said thank you: officer dibble |
| Tyneside Bugs 13/09/2016 at 16:42 #84802 | |
|
officer dibble
409 posts |
" said:Not sure if this has been mentioned but 2N24 arrives at Newcastle at 12:56 and forms 5W64 which is due to leave at 12:04? Should the ECS depart at 13:04 instead?First I knew of this - thank you. This has been resolved for v1.2 of the Tyneside TT. When in doubt - Contingency plan 2A. Someone didn't buy the milk - 2A. Someone sneezed at Swansea - 2A. A driver complains the cab is too cold - 2A. Unable to operate a HEx service 4 vice 8 - 2A. Points failure at Ipswich - 2A. Landslip at Pitlochry - 2A Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Bugs 13/09/2016 at 17:01 #84803 | |
|
Class 92
359 posts |
" said:" said:ARS also decided to route this train back into platform 7 rather than platform 1 so I had to send it around the loop again.Not sure if this has been mentioned but 2N24 arrives at Newcastle at 12:56 and forms 5W64 which is due to leave at 12:04? Should the ECS depart at 13:04 instead?First I knew of this - thank you. This has been resolved for v1.2 of the Tyneside TT. Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 20/09/2016 at 19:21 #85158 | |
|
John 23
176 posts
|
Still with this fault at Sunderland. Data v1.1 Not cured by updating. Logged as fault 0015624 Now have oncoming train from Down Sunderland trying to go into P1, with a metro stood there. Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 21/09/2016 at 10:29 #85176 | |
|
John 23
176 posts
|
I should have added that the message comes up: Swingset won't swing".
Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 24/09/2016 at 20:41 #85359 | |
|
clive
2789 posts |
John 23 in post 85176 said:I should have added that the message comes up: Swingset won't swing".Is this at startup (while trains are seeding) or later? Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 26/09/2016 at 12:31 #85397 | |
Chrisrail
384 posts |
Pelaw DPGL 320m Pelaw UPGL 383m Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 28/09/2016 at 10:10 #85453 | |
|
John 23
176 posts
|
Clive, The swingset won't swing well into the session, at about 1130 - 1200 from memory. The routes cannot be cancelled and so we have a Mexican Standoff with two trains. I also notice that the phone ringing goes wonky at the same time. Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 29/09/2016 at 22:22 #85509 | |
|
MarkC
1105 posts |
Just been experimenting with Tyneside at the Wardley entry, and I have noticed some peculiarities, trains traveling on the line in the DN direction towards Sig "9" in the track circuts leading up to it the direction of travel displayed in "F2" starts to show UP, but on stopping at or passing the signal will display "DN" again And most strange and alarming if the train stops (ie: passing is not ticked) at signal "9" the trains will start back to Wardley traveling wrong direction on DN line. I have attached a TT I made so staff can use it to see the problems. 4 trains have been made but only the last one will reverse back towards Wardley Added info while I was experimenting I also had an Access violation I have added the realivent part of the loader LOG Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Last edited: 29/09/2016 at 22:35 by MarkC Reason: Added info Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 29/09/2016 at 23:17 #85513 | |
|
MarkC
1105 posts |
With regrads to the above the TT editor validates a route from Wardley to Pelaw jn using line "JL" which I belive is the line from Jarrow Shell But the train will enter at Wardley but the route is set from signal "31" Same is true for a route from Jarrow Shell to Pelaw jn using line "LL" it sets the route up from Signal "9" Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 30/09/2016 at 16:15 #85529 | |
Steamer
3984 posts |
Mantis 15947 for Wardley entering issue, #15948 for path code issue.
"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply The following user said thank you: MarkC |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 05/12/2016 at 22:28 #89711 | |
|
Forest Pines
525 posts |
Here's a bug I don't think seems to have been spotted so far: with its A button pressed, signal T277 will clear with its apparent overlap track TYAU occupied. I've tried to attach an image to demonstrate, but was unable to get it to upload. Last edited: 05/12/2016 at 22:29 by Forest Pines Reason: File upload failed (again) Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 05/12/2016 at 22:48 #89713 | |
|
Steamer
3984 posts |
Forest Pines in post 89711 said:Here's a bug I don't think seems to have been spotted so far: with its A button pressed, signal T277 will clear with its apparent overlap track TYAU occupied.Tested and confirmed, though occurs regardless of auto button state. Mantis 16210. "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 26/07/2018 at 12:17 #110402 | |
tynie123
234 posts |
Hi Geoff Bought this yesterday and spent a few hours mastering it..can you tell me how you can colour the track to indicate the different power sources. I have a number of sims were this is relevant cheers Iain Log in to reply |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 26/07/2018 at 14:46 #110408 | |
bugsy
1766 posts |
tynie123 in post 110402 said:Hi GeoffUnless there's something that I don't know about, the user can't change the colour of the tracks in SimSig. Where there are different power sources in a sim, you'll usually find information in the relevant simulation manual, in this case, on page number 17 of the Tyneside User Manual, there is a link to a coloured diagram which shows the different power sources and where there is un-electrified track. This is the link for Tyneside IECC: https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=simulations:tyneside:reference Bugsy Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate. Log in to reply The following user said thank you: tynie123 |
| Tyneside Q&A and issues 26/07/2018 at 14:51 #110409 | |
|
tynie123
234 posts |
Cheers mate I must have seen that and thought it would replicate on SIM. Thanks will keep it handy. cracking game.
Log in to reply |