Page 1 of 1
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 16/03/2017 at 15:25 #93664 | |
headshot119
![]() 4869 posts |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 This thread is for discussion of the Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 timetable. "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 23/03/2017 at 17:52 #94040 | |
MarkC
![]() 1099 posts |
A user mentioned that 3S61 would not reverse at Heath JN see post here, and after investigating I found that the TT is incorrect for it. the way the TT is current set it tries to reverse at Heath LL and return to Croyton After Croyton it should pass Heath JN and reverse at Heath JN HJ21. I have attached Screen shots of the original TT and then the adjustment made. It is in ALL 3 versions of the timetable ![]() ![]() I should just note also the original route does validate in the Timetable Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Last edited: 23/03/2017 at 17:59 by MarkC Reason: added info Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 23/03/2017 at 18:06 #94044 | |
headshot119
![]() 4869 posts |
Mark, cheers for that new versions of all 3 timetable starts pushed (1.0.2)
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply The following user said thank you: MarkC |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 10/04/2017 at 20:21 #94424 | |
grahamj42
![]() 130 posts |
2Q08 will not pass Taff's Well. Whether running late via Radyr P3 or on time via P2 (there's a platform conflict), the driver always calls from VR516 complaining about a wrong route. Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 10/04/2017 at 21:15 #94425 | |
Stephen Fulcher
![]() 2055 posts |
Can you show us a screenshot of where he is and the timetable window please? Either that or attach a save with the problem. Last edited: 10/04/2017 at 21:15 by Stephen Fulcher Reason: Add save option Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 10/04/2017 at 22:17 #94426 | |
Steamer
![]() 3958 posts |
Stephen Fulcher in post 94425 said:Can you show us a screenshot of where he is and the timetable window please?Tested and confirmed. The train is timetabled to reverse north of Abercynon and head back to Ninian Park, however it won't accept the route to Pontypridd. It correctly rejects the route into Taffs Well P2. Mantis 17223 "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 11/04/2017 at 22:57 #94445 | |
headshot119
![]() 4869 posts |
Updated timetables available to fix this (1.0.4 for Valleys 1.0.7 for Cardiff).
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply The following users said thank you: BarryM, grahamj42 |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 16/04/2017 at 00:48 #94511 | |
tjtbcork
![]() 75 posts |
Running this chained with Cardiff SX 08 04 2015 0000 Start. 6C45 1054 Tower Colliery EWS-Aberthaw Power Station is missing from the Cardiff VOG TT. Tim. Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 16/04/2017 at 13:49 #94515 | |
Stephen Fulcher
![]() 2055 posts |
Bug confirmed, applies to 0400hrs start too. Logged on Mantis as 17244 for attention of Meld. Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 16/04/2017 at 22:47 #94529 | |
Meld
![]() 1108 posts |
Update issued timetables v 1.0.2 Check for updates for new versions
Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!! Last edited: 16/04/2017 at 22:49 by Meld Reason: None given Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 06/06/2017 at 23:53 #95708 | |
MarkC
![]() 1099 posts |
Just been on this sim and noticed 2H03 has an incorrect platform allocation at Ystrad Mynach, TT says P1, but there is no route that will take the train to P1, I belive it should be P2, its next working 5H03 may need a platform alteration as well to P2
Last edited: 07/06/2017 at 00:02 by MarkC Reason: edited Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 07/06/2017 at 12:13 #95721 | |
Meld
![]() 1108 posts |
mark265 in post 95708 said:Just been on this sim and noticed 2H03 has an incorrect platform allocation at Ystrad Mynach, TT says P1, but there is no route that will take the train to P1, I belive it should be P2, its next working 5H03 may need a platform alteration as well to P2Agreed it should be P2, however Network Rail timetablers have decided in error that it uses P1. In all the data I have for terminating services over the last 3 years this is the case. Down to signaller knowledge I feel on this one, you can see the move isnt correct so make the adjustment needed. Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!! Log in to reply The following user said thank you: MarkC |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 28/10/2017 at 16:04 #102554 | |
Jan
![]() 892 posts |
When running chained with the other Cardiff simulations, there seems to be a mismatch regarding the 4C9x/6C9x trains running between Cwmbargoed and Aberthaw Power Station. The Valleys timetable has the full complement of trains ranging from xC91 to xC96 in both directions, however the Queen Street and VoG timetables only know about 4C96, 6C91 and 6C96.
Two million people attempt to use Birmingham's magnificent rail network every year, with just over a million of them managing to get further than Smethwick. Last edited: 28/10/2017 at 16:05 by Jan Reason: None given Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 28/10/2017 at 17:32 #102557 | |
Meld
![]() 1108 posts |
Too many on the Valleys - TT update to 1.0.6 will be available later
Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!! Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Jan |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 13/01/2019 at 14:44 #114706 | |
y10g9
![]() 895 posts |
0400 start TT 2M00 Which appears to be an early morning Cardiff to Merthyr Tydfil service is labelled as the 2236 Cardiff Central-Maesteg service Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 13/01/2019 at 15:32 #114707 | |
Meld
![]() 1108 posts |
I'm not over worried about descriptions being wrong.The early sim releases had to have descriptions manually edited in. Thanks to Geoff we now have things a lot easier. A few mistakes were forced to occur, When time allows there will be new versions of all the Welsh TTs Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!! Log in to reply The following user said thank you: y10g9 |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 14/01/2021 at 13:31 #136413 | |
NicholasN
![]() 40 posts |
This issue is possibly present in all timetables and I don't know enough yet about the workings of the simulation to know if it can be remedied, and/or if it's a timetable or sim issue. Anyway, here goes: Put simply, when running the timetable with a moderate amount of delay, I managed to have two instances of the same train appear. 2C15 (entering at Queen Street and running to Coryton) was reported running 50 minutes late before entering. No problem. It duly entered and was routed to Coryton. Whilst it was still en-route, 2V17 entered at Ninian Park, running to Radyr, a few minutes late. Then I noticed that 2C15 was due to become that same 2V17 at Coryton - or in other words, the seeding of 2V17 at Ninian Park to Radyr does not appear to take into account any lateness from that same earlier train from Coryton to Queen Street where it briefly exits the sim. Hope that makes sense. Screenshot attached. ![]() Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Log in to reply |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 14/01/2021 at 13:41 #136414 | |
Stephen Fulcher
![]() 2055 posts |
There’s a rule missing in the timetable,
Log in to reply The following user said thank you: NicholasN |
Cardiff Valleys Weekday SX 08 04 2015 14/01/2021 at 14:32 #136418 | |
Meld
![]() 1108 posts |
Mantis 32813 - Subject to a rebuild of the 2015s to v5 loader standards.
Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!! Log in to reply The following user said thank you: NicholasN |