Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

jem771, Person82, 442s3, andi, kpl455, Meld, mailguru23605, Vexed01, tjfrancis (9 users seen recently)

SWT Slam Door services 2005

You are here: Home > Forum > Miscellaneous > The real thing (anything else rail-oriented) > SWT Slam Door services 2005

Page 1 of 1

SWT Slam Door services 2005 08/11/2017 at 01:24 #102707
Underwood
Avatar
748 posts
Hello all,

Can anyone remember if SWT were running 421's or 423's in 2005? I can't remember when they ended or if they were working in 2005, what they tended to do?

I tried looking at the Waterloo SimSig timetables for some idea, but the BH Monday 2005 TT has no slammers at all, and the 2004 one is all slammers and no Desiro's. Most or all of the 450's were working in 2005 weren't they? Was there a handful of slammers still about or was it half and half?


Any help appreciated!

James.

Log in to reply
SWT Slam Door services 2005 08/11/2017 at 06:45 #102709
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5402 posts
According to wikipedia 4CEPs ended on SWT in May 2005 and the final working was Waterloo to Bournemouth with what appears to have been the final 4VEP working too.

Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Underwood
SWT Slam Door services 2005 08/11/2017 at 09:09 #102710
kaiwhara
Avatar
587 posts
Hi James

I have found a bunch of Fratton Diagrams from that period but no indication whether they were CEP's or CIG's. VEP's were all Wimbledon Diagrams and I can't find any (doesn't mean there were not any though!)

Andrew

Sorry guys, I am in the business of making people wait!
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Underwood
SWT Slam Door services 2005 09/11/2017 at 10:58 #102734
Underwood
Avatar
748 posts
Thanks guys!

It's for Railworks London - Brighton around the Clapham area for AI trains. I should be able to put a few 450's in instead just wondering if a few too many 450's at one time would be un-realistic, but it should be ok by the sound of it.


Thanks again!

James.

Log in to reply