Page 1 of 1
| Cannot route Burton UML to Clay Miills UGL 27/01/2018 at 15:18 #105520 | |
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts 
|
Hi, If I route from 173 to 181 to shunt a train out of the way (restrictive aspect), I can't then use that route because 159->173 complains that points are locked reverse. The overlap for this route is into the junction. Should the route 150-173-181 be allowed? Thanks Jamie Jamie S (JAMS) Last edited: 27/01/2018 at 15:18 by 9pN1SEAp Reason: typo Log in to reply |
| Cannot route Burton UML to Clay Miills UGL 27/01/2018 at 16:25 #105521 | |
pedroathome
915 posts
|
9pN1SEAp in post 105520 said:Hi,This I would suggest is correct behavior. The route 159 -> 173 requires for the overlap, the points ahead in the normal position. Once the overlap has timed out, then yes you should be able to then set the onward route 173 -> 181. ==== EDIT ==== Just looking through the rest of the sim, it looks like you can effectively set an onward route through most the rest of the sim in this situation. Mantis 19587 James Last edited: 27/01/2018 at 16:31 by pedroathome Reason: None given Log in to reply The following user said thank you: 9pN1SEAp |