Page 1 of 1
| New yard seed appeared at Newton Abbot? 26/07/2018 at 23:37 #110413 | |
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
A very strange thing has just happened with 5L28 which was supposed to seed at Exeter New Yard... Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
| New yard seed appeared at Newton Abbot? 26/07/2018 at 23:53 #110414 | |
pedroathome
915 posts |
9pN1SEAp in post 110413 said:A very strange thing has just happened with 5L28 which was supposed to seed at Exeter New Yard...Something to me dosen't look quit right here, especially given that there is no seed point for signal E666 on the adjacent road (Obvious seed point that is). Also, on a side note, the 5L28 that you have the seeding location isue with, 159's are, as far as I know all 3 cars, and on the Exeter - Waterloos, unless there is anything I've missed in realiaty all work as a multiple of 3 coaches. James Log in to reply |
| New yard seed appeared at Newton Abbot? 27/07/2018 at 08:22 #110418 | |
|
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
Thanks. Good spot on the 159's - I'll fix this in my types file. Seeding at S645 (towards the shunt neck) instead worked fine. Jamie S (JAMS) Last edited: 27/07/2018 at 13:26 by 9pN1SEAp Reason: More info Log in to reply |
| New yard seed appeared at Newton Abbot? 27/07/2018 at 14:00 #110421 | |
JamesN
1607 posts |
The original versions of Exeter Sim had incorrect signal numbers. These were corrected in the newer loader version by fiddling with the display names of the signals - There was some discussion about the seed names not updating over to the new (correct) signal numbers; although I can’t now find the thread.
Log in to reply |
| New yard seed appeared at Newton Abbot? 05/02/2019 at 22:09 #115393 | |
|
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
Fixed - see https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Forum/ThreadView/49485?postId=115389
Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
| New yard seed appeared at Newton Abbot? 05/02/2019 at 23:09 #115396 | |
|
JamesN
1607 posts |
9pN1SEAp in post 115393 said:Fixed - see https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Forum/ThreadView/49485?postId=115389Not fixed, duplicate report. Log in to reply |