Page 1 of 1
Crewe 24/09/2018 at 02:32 #112301 | |
tom_johnson_79
![]() 1 posts |
Hi, would love to see Crewe station and the lines to Shrewsbury/Stoke/Manchester/Wolves
Log in to reply |
Crewe 24/09/2018 at 17:01 #112307 | |
Phil-jmw
![]() 674 posts |
tom_johnson_79 in post 112301 said:Hi, would love to see Crewe station and the lines to Shrewsbury/Stoke/Manchester/WolvesCrewe - Shrewsbury is already simulated in the Shrewsbury sim, Betley Road - Penkridge is simulated in the Stafford sim, Penkridge - Wolverhampton is simulated in the Wolverhampton sim. Log in to reply |
Crewe 10/11/2018 at 01:51 #113219 | |
37087
![]() 43 posts |
But the actual beast that would be Crewe + potentially the likes of Gresty Lane, Coal Yard, Steel Works, the Station, the Sorting Sidings etc would be a real Simsig brute.
Log in to reply The following user said thank you: BenWright |
Crewe 11/11/2018 at 17:27 #113244 | |
Peter Bennet
![]() 5377 posts |
Phil-jmw in post 112307 said:tom_johnson_79 in post 112301 said:I read the request as meaning the lines within the control of Crewe that go towards these places.Hi, would love to see Crewe station and the lines to Shrewsbury/Stoke/Manchester/WolvesCrewe - Shrewsbury is already simulated in the Shrewsbury sim, Betley Road - Penkridge is simulated in the Stafford sim, Penkridge - Wolverhampton is simulated in the Wolverhampton sim. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
Crewe 12/11/2018 at 11:57 #113253 | |
bfcmik
![]() 99 posts |
Could be a tough one! Here is a screenshot of the current diagram taken from Railcam website. (you will see the 4 live camera feeds around the heritage centre. Well worth the subscription!!!) Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Log in to reply |
Crewe 15/04/2019 at 19:51 #117615 | |
BenWright
![]() 170 posts ![]() |
Have been wanting this since day one, would be a really really great addition especially seeing as I work (volunteer) for Crewe Heritage Centre!
Last edited: 15/04/2019 at 19:51 by BenWright Reason: None given Log in to reply |