Page 1 of 1
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 03/05/2019 at 07:11 #118036 | |
Giantray
![]() 342 posts |
Morning all, Using the Tyneside IECC SimSig, I have a loco in the UGL at Darlington, signalled from 896 signal to 940 signal on the down Saltburn to reverse and run from 911 shut to 895 signal. I can get the move to happen if I give arrival and departure times at 'Darlington T911/T917/T919'. This is okay, but if the shunt move is signalled early, the loco will wait at 911 shunt until departure time. I have tried using an arrival time/ departure passing time and the loco does not reverse at 911, instead carries on past 940 signal to Eaglescliffe. Does anyone have a way of reversing the loco so that if it has been give the shunt signal early to return it moves and does not wait until departure time? Professionalism mean nothing around a bunch of Amatuer wannabees! Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 03/05/2019 at 08:18 #118037 | |
Steamer
![]() 3958 posts |
Set the departure time at the reversing point to 00:00, this will allow the loco to depart as soon as it's ready.
"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Giantray |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 03/05/2019 at 09:18 #118039 | |
postal
![]() 5216 posts |
Steamer in post 118037 said:Set the departure time at the reversing point to 00:00, this will allow the loco to depart as soon as it's ready.That does have the disadvantage if the reverse is taking place at a location monitored by the F8 simplifier that things get out of sequence and you don't get a clear picture of the occupation. It would be really nice if there was an option at the location in the TT to check a box instructing the loco/train to move as soon as possible (i.e. as soon as any actions/dwell times/reverses etc. had taken place). “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 03/05/2019 at 10:59 #118041 | |
WesternChampion
![]() 173 posts |
Does ticking "set down only" at the reversal point achieve what is required? Chris Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 03/05/2019 at 11:48 #118043 | |
jc92
![]() 3649 posts ![]() |
WesternChampion in post 118041 said:Does ticking "set down only" at the reversal point achieve what is required?Partially. It allows it to depart early but doesn't guarantee it. "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply The following user said thank you: WesternChampion |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 04/05/2019 at 07:54 #118073 | |
Giantray
![]() 342 posts |
postal in post 118039 said:Steamer in post 118037 said:I didn't think of using 00:00. I actually use this for Test Trains/Track Recorders. As I do not us Simplifiers for anything other than Platform Occupation, I think the 00:00 is my best option.Set the departure time at the reversing point to 00:00, this will allow the loco to depart as soon as it's ready.That does have the disadvantage if the reverse is taking place at a location monitored by the F8 simplifier that things get out of sequence and you don't get a clear picture of the occupation. It would be really nice if there was an option at the location in the TT to check a box instructing the loco/train to move as soon as possible (i.e. as soon as any actions/dwell times/reverses etc. had taken place). Thanks everyone. Professionalism mean nothing around a bunch of Amatuer wannabees! Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 06/05/2019 at 14:08 #118124 | |
Lyn-Greenwood
![]() 239 posts |
postal in post 118039 said:Steamer in post 118037 said:I agree with what Postal says. It's very annoying when a loco or freight train "insists" on waiting for the booked departure time when there is a path available for it to depart early. Using Set Down Only works most times, but not when you want it to! Arriving early at the location makes matters even worse, especially if the train is scheduled to wait on a main line. I also don't like the use of a passing time as the departure time (which some timetable writers seem to have started doing) as this causes ARS (if enabled) to immediately set a route for the train.Set the departure time at the reversing point to 00:00, this will allow the loco to depart as soon as it's ready.That does have the disadvantage if the reverse is taking place at a location monitored by the F8 simplifier that things get out of sequence and you don't get a clear picture of the occupation. It would be really nice if there was an option at the location in the TT to check a box instructing the loco/train to move as soon as possible (i.e. as soon as any actions/dwell times/reverses etc. had taken place). Please add Postal's proposal to the Wish List. Log in to reply The following users said thank you: VInce, postal |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 06/05/2019 at 15:09 #118125 | |
VInce
![]() 579 posts |
Lyn-Greenwood in post 118124 said:postal in post 118039 said:Lyn,Steamer in post 118037 said:I agree with what Postal says. It's very annoying when a loco or freight train "insists" on waiting for the booked departure time when there is a path available for it to depart early. Using Set Down Only works most times, but not when you want it to! Arriving early at the location makes matters even worse, especially if the train is scheduled to wait on a main line. I also don't like the use of a passing time as the departure time (which some timetable writers seem to have started doing) as this causes ARS (if enabled) to immediately set a route for the train.Set the departure time at the reversing point to 00:00, this will allow the loco to depart as soon as it's ready.That does have the disadvantage if the reverse is taking place at a location monitored by the F8 simplifier that things get out of sequence and you don't get a clear picture of the occupation. It would be really nice if there was an option at the location in the TT to check a box instructing the loco/train to move as soon as possible (i.e. as soon as any actions/dwell times/reverses etc. had taken place). I think we'll be very lucky to see any change here. I've raised this point countless times since I joined the group and we're still in the same place. As both you and I are aware the modern way is for trains to run exactly to WTT due to performance regimes but in historical times tables this is ridiculous. In timetables built around the 70s 80s and 90s only about 40% of trains that ran were in the WTT. The rest were untimed, on trip notices, control specials, station shunts, LD movements and all the rest so that's the way I do it. Anything that isn't in the WTT is untimed save for an entry time where this is necessary. Its time to make the "d", the "set down only" into "will leave when ready" 100% of the time not when the core code thinks it should. I just don't understand why there is a view on here that the "set down only" thing should have any restriction on it at all. Its very unlikely to be used in a modern timetable anyway, and in an historical one a light engine shunt isn't going to leave a point early, get to a timed reversal point over a busy junction and sit there with the signal off waiting for right time. Just not realistic. Vince I walk around inside the questions of my day, I navigate the inner reaches of my disarray, I pass the altars where fools and thieves hold sway, I wait for night to come and lift this dread away : Jackson Browne - The Night Inside Me Last edited: 06/05/2019 at 15:29 by VInce Reason: None given Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 06/05/2019 at 15:49 #118126 | |
jc92
![]() 3649 posts ![]() |
VInce in post 118125 said:Lyn-Greenwood in post 118124 said:Vince.postal in post 118039 said:Lyn,Steamer in post 118037 said:I agree with what Postal says. It's very annoying when a loco or freight train "insists" on waiting for the booked departure time when there is a path available for it to depart early. Using Set Down Only works most times, but not when you want it to! Arriving early at the location makes matters even worse, especially if the train is scheduled to wait on a main line. I also don't like the use of a passing time as the departure time (which some timetable writers seem to have started doing) as this causes ARS (if enabled) to immediately set a route for the train.Set the departure time at the reversing point to 00:00, this will allow the loco to depart as soon as it's ready.That does have the disadvantage if the reverse is taking place at a location monitored by the F8 simplifier that things get out of sequence and you don't get a clear picture of the occupation. It would be really nice if there was an option at the location in the TT to check a box instructing the loco/train to move as soon as possible (i.e. as soon as any actions/dwell times/reverses etc. had taken place). I've always thought set down only works correctly to give a bit of unpredictability to services. Eg sometimes it'll drop passengers in seconds and be off, another time there's more parcels than usual to unload so it doesn't depart until booked time. I think the real issue is the lack of "always depart early" whilst there is a "wait until booked time" option. "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply The following users said thank you: VInce, postal, Lyn-Greenwood |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 06/05/2019 at 16:10 #118127 | |
VInce
![]() 579 posts |
jc92 in post 118126 said:VInce in post 118125 said:Agreed!Lyn-Greenwood in post 118124 said:Vince.postal in post 118039 said:Lyn,Steamer in post 118037 said:I agree with what Postal says. It's very annoying when a loco or freight train "insists" on waiting for the booked departure time when there is a path available for it to depart early. Using Set Down Only works most times, but not when you want it to! Arriving early at the location makes matters even worse, especially if the train is scheduled to wait on a main line. I also don't like the use of a passing time as the departure time (which some timetable writers seem to have started doing) as this causes ARS (if enabled) to immediately set a route for the train.Set the departure time at the reversing point to 00:00, this will allow the loco to depart as soon as it's ready.That does have the disadvantage if the reverse is taking place at a location monitored by the F8 simplifier that things get out of sequence and you don't get a clear picture of the occupation. It would be really nice if there was an option at the location in the TT to check a box instructing the loco/train to move as soon as possible (i.e. as soon as any actions/dwell times/reverses etc. had taken place). Vince I walk around inside the questions of my day, I navigate the inner reaches of my disarray, I pass the altars where fools and thieves hold sway, I wait for night to come and lift this dread away : Jackson Browne - The Night Inside Me Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 06/05/2019 at 22:38 #118138 | |
postal
![]() 5216 posts |
Been doing some housekeeping on my reports on the bug tracker. I actually raised the request for a "must move" option as a "Proposal (request for comments)" on 11/09/2017 (#0017852). There have been no comments to date! I have added a link to this thread as evidence that some other users would see it as a valuable enhancement. “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 06/05/2019 at 22:45 #118139 | |
headshot119
![]() 4869 posts |
Throwing the idea out there. How about, any of class 3-9 + 0, with a set down only time, are ready to move as soon as all custom dwell times + rules are met. UNLESS the must wait to time flag is checked. Class 1-2 continue to work as now? "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 06/05/2019 at 23:30 #118141 | |
GeoffM
![]() 6344 posts ![]() |
VInce in post 118125 said:I just don't understand why there is a view on here that the "set down only" thing should have any restriction on it at all. Its very unlikely to be used in a modern timetable anywayIt's actually very common. The idea of rolling "set down only", "must depart on time" etc into a couple of drop-downs has been discussed and while some complain that "ooh it's been on Mantis but nothing's been done", it is very much there and in the queue along with a large number of other feature requests. SimSig Boss Log in to reply The following user said thank you: VInce |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 07/05/2019 at 09:37 #118143 | |
jc92
![]() 3649 posts ![]() |
headshot119 in post 118139 said:Throwing the idea out there.The only issue that doesn't resolve is class 1 postal/parcels/newspaper trains and any class 1 or 2 booked to sit in a loop or at a junction which gets the road early. "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 07/05/2019 at 10:43 #118144 | |
postal
![]() 5216 posts |
jc92 in post 118143 said:headshot119 in post 118139 said:Or freights that are stopped for scheduled examination (e.g. hazardous cargo) so will require a dwell time but maybe not the full TT'd allowance. The postal/parcels/newspaper trains can have a dwell time set in the TT or by a "must not depart" rule whereby they will normally depart whenever their platform duties are completed but which will be randomly held on a few occasions just as may happen in real life when the driver needs a PNB or there is a minor technical problem (or in the heritage TT eras when I used to travel on the Royal Mail TPOs from time to time and there were certain stations where you never left early as the station bar was still open).Throwing the idea out there.The only issue that doesn't resolve is class 1 postal/parcels/newspaper trains and any class 1 or 2 booked to sit in a loop or at a junction which gets the road early. “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
Using Tyneside IECC with a Timetable issue 07/05/2019 at 15:37 #118145 | |
Lyn-Greenwood
![]() 239 posts |
postal in post 118144 said:jc92 in post 118143 said:And so it gets more complicated and probably needs the drop-down menu approach mentioned by Geoff earlier.headshot119 in post 118139 said:Or freights that are stopped for scheduled examination (e.g. hazardous cargo) so will require a dwell time but maybe not the full TT'd allowance. The postal/parcels/newspaper trains can have a dwell time set in the TT or by a "must not depart" rule whereby they will normally depart whenever their platform duties are completed but which will be randomly held on a few occasions just as may happen in real life when the driver needs a PNB or there is a minor technical problem (or in the heritage TT eras when I used to travel on the Royal Mail TPOs from time to time and there were certain stations where you never left early as the station bar was still open).Throwing the idea out there.The only issue that doesn't resolve is class 1 postal/parcels/newspaper trains and any class 1 or 2 booked to sit in a loop or at a junction which gets the road early. I'd like to propose a simple interim solution which should be easy to implement, requires no timetable changes and which will probably deal with the majority of situations that have been cited by various users. The current situation is that a non-passenger train usually requests an early departure via a phone call from the driver. The signaller can then tell the driver to call back in 2/5/15 minutes, or to wait until the scheduled departure time before ringing again or he can simply clear the signal for the train to depart. If the "usually" became "always", then I believe this would satisfy most users' needs, but only as an interim solution until a more sophisticated approach is agreed and implemented. I'm assuming that all activities, dwell times, Rules, etc. are satisfied before the driver makes his phone call. What I don't know is how long after arrival the decision is made to request an early departure. Is it based on the scheduled layover time, a fixed interval or just a random time? Please comment on what I've proposed as this is an issue that has niggled me for a long time and I would hope that a simple fix had a good chance of being implemented quickly if many users agree with what I've proposed. Log in to reply |