Page 1 of 1
TT does not step up beyond Caldew Jn if routed from sig 436 to 335 28/05/2019 at 17:12 #118510 | |
Albert
1315 posts |
Hello, I had a loco scheduled Kingmoor Depot to Carlisle that I routed out via CE436-CE335 (Down Goods-Down Main) because both up lines were occupied by other trains. The train's TT did not step up from Caldew to Carlisle when making that movement. For reference: it was 0T32/TRIP32BMO of the included 79/80 TT. AJP in games Log in to reply |
TT does not step up beyond Caldew Jn if routed from sig 436 to 335 28/05/2019 at 17:41 #118511 | |
bfcmik
100 posts |
Pretty sure that is because it not an agreed routing as it is using shunt signals to make the movement
Log in to reply |
TT does not step up beyond Caldew Jn if routed from sig 436 to 335 28/05/2019 at 18:17 #118513 | |
postal
5265 posts |
Albert in post 118510 said:Hello,Down Main was not reversibly signalled until after the crash that closed the Avoiding Lines. “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
TT does not step up beyond Caldew Jn if routed from sig 436 to 335 28/05/2019 at 20:57 #118516 | |
Albert
1315 posts |
Ok, so you are saying that this move should not be possible at all in the sim. As in, the Down Main shunt signal is only for reversing to/from Carlisle and should not be accessible from CE436? (I do not think reversing on the DM to go from the yard to Scotland is a valid procedure.) From signal CE437 Up Goods it is not possible to route this way. If I understand you correctly, the route to Down Main from CE436 Down Goods also needs to be taken out for realism. AJP in games Log in to reply |
TT does not step up beyond Caldew Jn if routed from sig 436 to 335 28/05/2019 at 21:10 #118517 | |
jc92
3689 posts |
Tested and have found the same. Either the route shouldn't exist or the TT should step correctly. Also happens when routing towards CE336. Either way there's an issue. Mantis 25173
"We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Last edited: 28/05/2019 at 23:37 by jc92 Reason: None given Log in to reply The following users said thank you: postal, Albert |
TT does not step up beyond Caldew Jn if routed from sig 436 to 335 28/05/2019 at 23:12 #118521 | |
Albert
1315 posts |
CE356 does not exist, do you mean the TT does not step up either when going to CE336?
AJP in games Log in to reply |
TT does not step up beyond Caldew Jn if routed from sig 436 to 335 28/05/2019 at 23:38 #118523 | |
jc92
3689 posts |
Albert in post 118521 said:CE356 does not exist, do you mean the TT does not step up either when going to CE336?Yes. I've amended my reply. "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
TT does not step up beyond Caldew Jn if routed from sig 436 to 335 30/05/2019 at 12:37 #118551 | |
Hap
1039 posts |
I'm going to assume this is 1980s era (For which I have nothing to reference against), but in the 2000s & 2016 era CE436 should not and does not exist. There is no GPS on the DG to exit south. The line is not bi-di except for the brief single line section before Caldew Jn.
How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue Log in to reply |