Page 1 of 1
PRAR 2007 saved Southern CWN's? 10/10/2019 at 00:16 #120867 | |
Underwood
748 posts |
Hello all, Unfortunately I only have some saved 1H05 Southern Carriage Working Notice's from the now gone prar.fsnet site, which was handy for some 10 year old diagrams. Does anyone by chance have saved a copy of the 2007 Carriage Working Notice for the Southern region, if there was one done for that year? Or a 2006 one if that is the nearest one done? Trying to do the Buffer Puffer 4.1 tour on Railworks, but no idea on stock workings! Any help appreciated! James. Last edited: 10/10/2019 at 00:17 by Underwood Reason: None given Log in to reply |
PRAR 2007 saved Southern CWN's? 10/10/2019 at 13:13 #120875 | |
Edgemaster
332 posts |
An archive of the page is available, however it lacks the M-F working book. https://web.archive.org/web/20130915014524/http://www.prar.fsnet.co.uk/diagrams.html A copy of the 2007 M-F book does seem to have been archived by the UK Web Archive, although it is only accessible on the premises of the legal deposit libraries. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20141126053547mp_/http://www.prar.fsnet.co.uk/S_MF_1H07_2_v1.pdf Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Underwood |
PRAR 2007 saved Southern CWN's? 10/10/2019 at 19:08 #120882 | |
Underwood
748 posts |
Edgemaster in post 120875 said:An archive of the page is available, however it lacks the M-F working book. https://web.archive.org/web/20130915014524/http://www.prar.fsnet.co.uk/diagrams.htmlPerfect! Unusual about the weekday one being locked, but have accessed the Saturday one as you mention is accessible, this is just what I'm after as the Buffer Puffer Railtour was on a weekend :) Thank you very much for the link, most appreciated! James. Log in to reply |
PRAR 2007 saved Southern CWN's? 10/10/2019 at 19:28 #120883 | |
Edgemaster
332 posts |
The UK Web Archive has a much more comprehensive archive of websites with .uk domain names, however is only accessible at legal deposit libraries, or more widely with explicit permission from the website owner. I suspect this is to avoid copyright infringement claims. The international archive.org has no such qualms about republishing archived website content. Log in to reply |