Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

Person82, waucott, Hap, Meld, Galatea45699 (5 users seen recently)

Salisbury Sig 29R

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Released > Salisbury > Salisbury Sig 29R

Page 1 of 1

Salisbury Sig 29R 02/11/2021 at 19:31 #142158
Simdmuk
Avatar
155 posts
Without dwelling on the recent incident at Salisbury, on another rail forum, the signals leading up to Tunnel junction were discussed. One point was that signal SY29R, a three aspect repeater , displays Y, YY, G .
On the sim, when a route is set between sig 29 and sig 31 ,sig 29R displays green. Looking at a poor quality video clip, it seems that 29R does appear to have a middle aspect green lens, therefore would show Y,YY,G.
Is 29R incorrect on the sim ?


Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Log in to reply
Salisbury Sig 29R 02/11/2021 at 19:54 #142159
headshot119
Avatar
4869 posts
I've logged #35002 on mantis for investigation.
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Simdmuk
Salisbury Sig 29R 02/11/2021 at 20:02 #142160
TUT
Avatar
532 posts
For members of the SRS the original 1981 plan shows SY29R to be three-aspect YGY

https://www.s-r-s.org.uk/pullfile.asp?FilePath=Notices\BRSR&FileName=1981-swd-63-Plan.pdf

Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: Simdmuk, GeoffM
Salisbury Sig 29R 03/11/2021 at 18:59 #142171
AlexRail575
Avatar
136 posts
The video referred to is probably this one from 2015. SY29R is not particularly clear, although it's obvious enough that it is in the middle and that it is not an LED, unlike the previous one (286, at t=2080s).
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Simdmuk
Salisbury Sig 29R 03/11/2021 at 20:37 #142173
Simdmuk
Avatar
155 posts
Yep,that the video.


Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Last edited: 03/11/2021 at 20:39 by Simdmuk
Reason: None given

Log in to reply