Page 4 of 4
| Birmingham New Street Summer 1990 TT 06/02/2022 at 13:08 #145041 | |
bill_gensheet
1413 posts |
Gets worse if you look further back, TD were used like bus numbers ! All Walsall - Aston - Birmingham 2G51 All Wolves - Birmingham 2G61 (2G60 if from Stafford) All Birmingham - Chester 2D66 etc Still thinking how to approach this one for my possible 1975 TT set, may well use the current TD conventions. Last edited: 06/02/2022 at 13:09 by bill_gensheet Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Birmingham New Street Summer 1990 TT 06/02/2022 at 14:25 #145044 | |
58050
2659 posts 
|
bill_gensheet in post 145041 said:Gets worse if you look further back, TD were used like bus numbers ! Maybe using UIDs may resolve the TD issue there Bill, but the bigger problem with a 1970s era TT is the fact that Exchange carriage sdgs aren't on the sim. Log in to reply |
| Birmingham New Street Summer 1990 TT 06/02/2022 at 20:14 #145049 | |
|
bill_gensheet
1413 posts |
While UIDs will sort writing and make rules and any joins work on the right train, it was the user interactions as mentioned above that were more my concern. I have just finished entering a [redacted] timetable where all the real TD were just two digits, class and route. As for the exchange sidings, I was not planning to include Saltley as Moor St looks quite incompatible unless I use (new) Snow Hill in place of Moor St. Initially my scope is Wolverhampton and then Birmingham, so I can simply enter ECS from St Andrews Jn. Bill Log in to reply |
| Birmingham New Street Summer 1990 TT 06/02/2022 at 20:59 #145051 | |
|
58050
2659 posts
|
bill_gensheet in post 145049 said:While UIDs will sort writing and make rules and any joins work on the right train, it was the user interactions as mentioned above that were more my concern. I have just finished entering a [redacted] timetable where all the real TD were just two digits, class and route.Bill I do actually have a 1973 station A&D book for Wolverhampton if that helps. I can scan it for you if you like. Last edited: 06/02/2022 at 21:52 by 58050 Reason: corrected typo Log in to reply |
| Birmingham New Street Summer 1990 TT 06/02/2022 at 23:35 #145054 | |
jc92
3685 posts
|
bill_gensheet in post 145049 said:While UIDs will sort writing and make rules and any joins work on the right train, it was the user interactions as mentioned above that were more my concern. I have just finished entering a [redacted] timetable where all the real TD were just two digits, class and route.Exchange sidings is nothing to do with Saltley, the shunt frame box was released by new street and located firmly on the new street panel, not Saltley. Virtually all the loco hauled ECS and some NPCCS goes to and from there so it as pascal says, it'll create an extra job trying to find somewhere to put it all! "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
| Birmingham New Street Summer 1990 TT 07/02/2022 at 09:42 #145057 | |
|
kbarber
1742 posts |
bill_gensheet in post 145049 said:While UIDs will sort writing and make rules and any joins work on the right train, it was the user interactions as mentioned above that were more my concern. I have just finished entering a [redacted] timetable where all the real TD were just two digits, class and route.Sounds like the old York or Liverpool Street describers of the late 1940s/early '50s. The Liverpool Street system also had a diamond indication for electric trains. Given how old the tech was, it was still working remarkably well in the late 1970s. Log in to reply |
| Birmingham New Street Summer 1990 TT 07/02/2022 at 11:33 #145061 | |
|
slatteryc
254 posts |
[redacted] timetable chuckle Log in to reply The following user said thank you: bill_gensheet |
| Birmingham New Street Summer 1990 TT 07/02/2022 at 11:53 #145064 | |
|
bill_gensheet
1413 posts |
slatteryc in post 145061 said:[redacted] timetableAs originally posted - not mods having to remove anything <g> Log in to reply |