Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

2019 Timetable - Some ECS trains need changes to their divide instruction

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Timetables > Edge Hill > 2019 Timetable - Some ECS trains need changes to their divide instruction

Page 1 of 1

2019 Timetable - Some ECS trains need changes to their divide instruction 10/05/2023 at 17:16 #151745
moonraker
Avatar
370 posts
Online
A couple of the ECS moves in to Lime Street early morning have Detach Rear when they should be Detach Front. 5E05 from Edge Hill TMD forming 9E05 and 1E23 and 5A92 from Allerton TMD forming 2A92 and 2F50. As they stand the trains are round the wrong way after dividing meaning that earlier departures are stuck behind the later ones requiring a run to different TT via the F2 menu
Last edited: 10/05/2023 at 17:16 by moonraker
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
2019 Timetable - Some ECS trains need changes to their divide instruction 10/05/2023 at 17:17 #151746
headshot119
Avatar
4869 posts
Is this the user contributed 2019 timetable?
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer
Log in to reply
2019 Timetable - Some ECS trains need changes to their divide instruction 10/05/2023 at 17:18 #151747
moonraker
Avatar
370 posts
Online
Yes Ben Wright's TT
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: headshot119
2019 Timetable - Some ECS trains need changes to their divide instruction 10/05/2023 at 17:33 #151748
BenWright
Avatar
195 posts
Apologies, this was my first ever timetable and never got round to fixing the issues. Rest assured the new Edge Hill timetable I've made and currently testing is looking a damn sight better than my old ones
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: moonraker
2019 Timetable - Some ECS trains need changes to their divide instruction 10/05/2023 at 20:03 #151753
moonraker
Avatar
370 posts
Online
No probs mate. Still a good TT. Working my way through it
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: BenWright