Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

Person82, waucott, Hap, Meld, Galatea45699, Kage, Djennison, Dionysusnu, postal (9 users seen recently)

Woking FAQ

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Released > Woking ASC > Woking FAQ

Page 2 of 3

Woking FAQ 16/12/2022 at 17:45 #149375
GeoffM
Avatar
6376 posts
Shwam3 in post 149373 said:
- (Aldershot) If TDZU is unoccupied using F11, WK428 will go Y->R->Y after the overlap steps up while waiting for P2315 points to move, additionally I don't believe this overlap should not step up automatically.
The control table seemed to imply it was an automatic step-up, like Liverpool Street. However, it seems to be causing issues under certain circumstances so for the moment I will disable this. Mantis 37317.

Shwam3 in post 149373 said:
- (Pirbright Jn) If WK193 to WK951 route is set exactly 10 seconds after TBBL becomes occupied, WK193 begins cycling between red & yellow while WK191 flashes yellow.
Core code, though I don't ever recall seeing this before. Mantis 37318.

Shwam3 in post 149373 said:
- (Woking Jn) WK609 should not be approach controlled from red with the routes set from WK607 and towards WK379.
This particular control table was missing so the same conditions were used as the other routes from this signal. I'll take your word for it, with a minor note that it's not dependent on the routes behind it but the P2228's position. Mantis 37319.

Shwam3 in post 149373 said:
- (Woking) What is the point of the warner arrow at WK504 if there is no warner route from WK506?
Not sure. Mantis 37320.

Shwam3 in post 149373 said:
- (Woking) At WK170 trains booked to call at West Byfleet will not call wrong route if routed towards the up fast.
Cannot reproduce, and the data is there to prevent trains doing this.

Shwam3 in post 149373 said:
- (Woking) There should be warner routes from WK167 & WK369 to WK169 but there's no warner exit arrow (ROL overlap marker is present).
They've been booked out of use from virtually the beginning so the routes and button were not added.

Shwam3 in post 149373 said:
- (Woking) Is it correct for the warner overlap of WK608 to lock points P2225 normal while the full overlap does not?
Unfortunately this is another where a control table is missing to be sure. Upon reflection, looking at the scheme plan and photos, the overlap should never go towards P6. Mantis 37322.

Shwam3 in post 149373 said:
- (Brookwood) At WK387 trains booked towards Ash Vale wont call wrong route if sent towards Farnborough unless booked to stop at Brookwood.
Mantis 37321.

Shwam3 in post 149373 said:
- (Holybourne Sdgs) The cursor position for WK452 is incorrect, it's currently in the stem of the stop board.
Mantis 37323.

Thanks.

SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Shwam3
Woking FAQ 16/12/2022 at 17:47 #149376
GeoffM
Avatar
6376 posts
Phil-jmw in post 149374 said:
Auto facility does not work on WK428 Sig, Up Alton on approach to Aldershot Station.
That's correct - not on the main route but is on the warner. Unusual but correct.

SimSig Boss
Last edited: 16/12/2022 at 17:48 by GeoffM
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Phil-jmw
Woking FAQ 16/12/2022 at 18:52 #149377
Guts
Avatar
604 posts
I'm playing without ARS and the Auto platform buttons at Alton and Weybridge, do not work
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 16/12/2022 at 21:01 #149381
Hap
Avatar
1037 posts
Online
Guts in post 149377 said:
I'm playing without ARS and the Auto platform buttons at Alton and Weybridge, do not work
Mantis 37325

How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 16/12/2022 at 21:54 #149383
Phil-jmw
Avatar
675 posts
GeoffM in post 149376 said:
Phil-jmw in post 149374 said:
Auto facility does not work on WK428 Sig, Up Alton on approach to Aldershot Station.
That's correct - not on the main route but is on the warner. Unusual but correct.
Bizarre!

Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 16/12/2022 at 23:52 #149384
Guts
Avatar
604 posts
2P38 is TRTS'ing even though it delayed.

The original delay was for a 12:55 departure for which 2P38 is TRTS'ing but the train had just call at 12:56 to say it's further delayed BUT after the TRTS.


Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 01:10 #149386
Hap
Avatar
1037 posts
Online
IIRC there's a ticket for this already on Mantis. Either I or one of the testing team will have a gander at it tomorrow at a more sociable hour. I'm pretty sure that it was a core code issue. Stand by and we'll update asap on this one.
How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 14:21 #149396
GW43125
Avatar
495 posts
Routes from either platform at Hampton Court onto the down line (up direction) don't seem to be triggering the auto raise on Hampton Court LC.
Auto Lower on Cooks LC isn't working either, or does it require ARS on to set the route over the crossing before it'll lower?

Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 14:46 #149397
i26
Avatar
308 posts
GW43125 in post 149396 said:
Routes from either platform at Hampton Court onto the down line (up direction) don't seem to be triggering the auto raise on Hampton Court LC.
Auto Lower on Cooks LC isn't working either, or does it require ARS on to set the route over the crossing before it'll lower?
Pretty sure the route over Cooks has to be set for the crossing to auto lower.


Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 15:42 #149398
GW43125
Avatar
495 posts
i26 in post 149397 said:
GW43125 in post 149396 said:
Routes from either platform at Hampton Court onto the down line (up direction) don't seem to be triggering the auto raise on Hampton Court LC.
Auto Lower on Cooks LC isn't working either, or does it require ARS on to set the route over the crossing before it'll lower?
Pretty sure the route over Cooks has to be set for the crossing to auto lower.
Thanks.

Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 16:12 #149399
y10g9
Avatar
895 posts
GW43125 in post 149396 said:
Routes from either platform at Hampton Court onto the down line (up direction) don't seem to be triggering the auto raise on Hampton Court LC.

I've just tested this and not been able to reproduce. Do you have a save game that exhibits this behaviour please?

Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 16:35 #149400
GW43125
Avatar
495 posts
y10g9 in post 149399 said:
GW43125 in post 149396 said:
Routes from either platform at Hampton Court onto the down line (up direction) don't seem to be triggering the auto raise on Hampton Court LC.

I've just tested this and not been able to reproduce. Do you have a save game that exhibits this behaviour please?
In the attached save game, when 1J78 is routed up the down Hampton Court, the level crossing remains lowered after its passage.

Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 18:39 #149401
Guts
Avatar
604 posts
WK428 (on Up Alton on approach to Aldershot) has shown a COA for 1A52, which I believe happened when the overlap extended after the passage of the previous train 2N50.

I've got a previous save and an after save.

Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 19:12 #149403
i26
Avatar
308 posts
This happened during the meet for me as well and I passed it on to Karl.

Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 20:16 #149406
GeoffM
Avatar
6376 posts
Guts in post 149401 said:
WK428 (on Up Alton on approach to Aldershot) has shown a COA for 1A52, which I believe happened when the overlap extended after the passage of the previous train 2N50.
i26 in post 149403 said:
This happened during the meet for me as well and I passed it on to Karl.
I alluded to this here. I thought it was reported by another user here too but I can't find it. Nevertheless, it's been fixed for the next release.

SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: i26
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 22:18 #149407
Guts
Avatar
604 posts
GW43125 in post 149400 said:
y10g9 in post 149399 said:
GW43125 in post 149396 said:
Routes from either platform at Hampton Court onto the down line (up direction) don't seem to be triggering the auto raise on Hampton Court LC.

I've just tested this and not been able to reproduce. Do you have a save game that exhibits this behaviour please?
In the attached save game, when 1J78 is routed up the down Hampton Court, the level crossing remains lowered after its passage.
I just had the same. 2J54 has just gone over the Down Hampton in the Up direction, and the barriers did not raise I had to raise them myself.

Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 17/12/2022 at 23:08 #149409
GeoffM
Avatar
6376 posts
GW43125 in post 149400 said:
y10g9 in post 149399 said:
GW43125 in post 149396 said:
Routes from either platform at Hampton Court onto the down line (up direction) don't seem to be triggering the auto raise on Hampton Court LC.

I've just tested this and not been able to reproduce. Do you have a save game that exhibits this behaviour please?
In the attached save game, when 1J78 is routed up the down Hampton Court, the level crossing remains lowered after its passage.
We struggled to reproduce this, and I think it's because it is right on the threshold in terms of timing between working and not working - for example, if our trains crossed at 24mph but yours at 25mph. We think we've found the problem anyway - the odd track circuiting does not help.

Mantis 37330.

SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 18/12/2022 at 23:01 #149424
Hap
Avatar
1037 posts
Online
Guts in post 149384 said:
2P38 is TRTS'ing even though it delayed.

The original delay was for a 12:55 departure for which 2P38 is TRTS'ing but the train had just call at 12:56 to say it's further delayed BUT after the TRTS.

Mantis 35464 was the original ticket for a situation occurring like this. Your report has been added to that ticket.

How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue
Last edited: 18/12/2022 at 23:03 by Hap
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 19/12/2022 at 18:02 #149429
madaboutrains
Avatar
316 posts
Could Berrylands Jn [BRLANJN] location be added?
RIP Feltham Panel 1
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 19/12/2022 at 20:38 #149435
tjtbcork
Avatar
75 posts
In the attached save at 08:31:25 1A22 will receive an ACOA at WK428 as the overlap for WK422 steps up after 2N20 leaves Aldershot P3.
Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 19/12/2022 at 22:05 #149438
i26
Avatar
308 posts
tjtbcork in post 149435 said:
In the attached save at 08:31:25 1A22 will receive an ACOA at WK428 as the overlap for WK422 steps up after 2N20 leaves Aldershot P3.
This has been reported already and listed in Mantis.


Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 20/12/2022 at 00:26 #149440
9pN1SEAp
Avatar
1180 posts
Hi,

Just got this error, which I think is related to P2223 that seem to keep swinging in front of 5F84.

Thanks
Jamie

Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Jamie S (JAMS)
Last edited: 20/12/2022 at 00:27 by 9pN1SEAp
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 20/12/2022 at 03:18 #149441
GeoffM
Avatar
6376 posts
madaboutrains in post 149429 said:
Could Berrylands Jn [BRLANJN] location be added?
Mantis 37338. I notice it's only existed as a timing point since the 2022 TPR.

Mantis 37339 for Wimbledon.

SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 20/12/2022 at 11:18 #149448
madaboutrains
Avatar
316 posts
GeoffM in post 149441 said:
madaboutrains in post 149429 said:
Could Berrylands Jn [BRLANJN] location be added?
Mantis 37338. I notice it's only existed as a timing point since the 2022 TPR.

Mantis 37339 for Wimbledon.
Thats correct. Also at Waterloo West Crossings has come in.

RIP Feltham Panel 1
Log in to reply
Woking FAQ 20/12/2022 at 16:42 #149459
9pN1SEAp
Avatar
1180 posts
Driver 1T22 refuses to pass WK146 despite it proven and showing green. A PSAD authority just results in another phone call. USL Walton-on-Thames Starter.

It had previously been given authority to run over SOWC (home) section TARQ.

Thanks
Jamie

Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Jamie S (JAMS)
Last edited: 20/12/2022 at 16:44 by 9pN1SEAp
Reason: None given

Log in to reply