Page 2 of 2
Power Supply (Signalling & Operation) 11/04/2014 at 21:39 #58727 | |
guidomcc
246 posts |
Taken from a previous thread " said: All the freightliners in the Carlisle 79-80 timetable are worked by pairs of AC electric locos except those that are diesel hauled via the Newcastle line. I'm very well aware of the power of pairs of AC electric locos working in multiple on heavy freight services as I dealt with them between 1990 - 1994 whilst working at Liverpool Street Regional Control office with pairs of Cl.86s working between Willesden - Ipswich/Parkeston - Willesden. Also there are pairs working Ravenscraig - Dee Marsh steel trains. What people probably aren't aware of is the exceptional power drain in the 25Kv overhead traction current supply when you have a pair of AC locos working hard. You'd be lucky to get 80mph from a class 1 express worked by another AC loco in the same section as a pair of AC locos working hard on a freightliner or heavy freight train, such was the power drain on the overheads. Even EMUs also suffered the same low power performance if caught in the same section. Cl.87s having 5,000 horsepower, but they all tended to suffer from wheelslip due to their weight being light compared to heavier diesel locos. During the early 1990s any freightliners working through Colchester around midday the rear loco had to drop its pantograph between certain neutral sections either side of Colchester station as the national grid couldn't cope with the exceptional power drain from the overhead wires. If a freightliner worked by a pair of Cl.86s on full power went through the affected sections without dropping the 'pan' on the rear loco the whole of Colchester would get blacked out. Log in to reply |
Power Supply (Signalling & Operation) 11/04/2014 at 23:42 #58730 | |
postal
5264 posts |
" said:Greenhill Upper Junction, 22 March 2009.RAIB Report “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
Power Supply (Signalling & Operation) 12/04/2014 at 02:57 #58732 | |
Firefly
521 posts |
Quote:Greenhill Upper Junction, 22 March 2009. Points 125C failed to move Reverse when commanded by the route setting and when keyed Reverse by the signaller, and in both cases 125 indicated Reverse despite 125C being normal on the ground.But the above was not a failure of the Non -Vital transmission system. It was a wiring error in the point machine which was not correctly tested and as you say, thankfully very rare. Finger was suggesting a scenario where the non-safety critical circuitry failed on an otherwise correctly tested railway. FF Last edited: 12/04/2014 at 03:04 by Firefly Log in to reply |