Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Linux vs Windows

You are here: Home > Forum > Miscellaneous > Open mic (non-railway) > Linux vs Windows

Page 1 of 2

Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 05:25 #61193
uboat
Avatar
219 posts
Since XP and the new system files are not getting along I will have to change
or update my operating system. I tried Simsig under 2 different live versions
of Linux and both locked up the computer. So my question is which operating
software is best?

Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 05:43 #61194
GeoffM
Avatar
6377 posts
XP is officially obsolete according to MS. Technically SimSig is not supported under Linux but we do try our best. There has been a thread or two about updating a particular flavour or two of Linux to support certain features of SimSig but it's not like we have anything particularly special in SimSig that would thwart a Windows version of Linux if written correctly. By that I mean a version of Linux that supported anything normal that MS Windows would do, which is not an easy task when the latter is not fully public.

Best if somnebody says "I use SimSig on Wine XYZ" without any (major) issues.

SimSig Boss
Last edited: 01/06/2014 at 05:44 by GeoffM
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 06:49 #61195
AG
Avatar
2 posts
I do use it on wine 1.7.18, and the only issue is that the right click menu in the train list appears, but doesn't react to clicks - only to the underlined keyboard shortcuts. I did have to install a number of packages via winetricks (can't recall which at the moment), and use a 32-bit wine root (i.e. WINEARCH=win32) however.
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 08:46 #61196
BarryM
Avatar
2158 posts
" said:
Since XP and the new system files are not getting along I will have to change
or update my operating system. I tried Simsig under 2 different live versions
of Linux and both locked up the computer. So my question is which operating
software is best?
I run Simsig on XP (SP3) without any problems. The new system files work fine when setup correctly.
Barry

Barry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 08:54 #61197
delticfan
Avatar
476 posts
I run Simsig on Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit with no problems.
Mal.

Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 09:15 #61198
GW43125
Avatar
495 posts
I have an XP SP3 virtual machine under Windows 7 x64.
It will quite happily run brighton.sim (The only one I've tried on it) under loader V4.0.21 (It has no WiFi).

Hope this helps,
DSW.

Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 09:34 #61199
postal
Avatar
5265 posts
" said:
" said:
Since XP and the new system files are not getting along I will have to change
or update my operating system. I tried Simsig under 2 different live versions
of Linux and both locked up the computer. So my question is which operating
software is best?
I run Simsig on XP (SP3) without any problems. The new system files work fine when setup correctly.
Barry
No problems on my XP SP3 legacy system either.

“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 14:22 #61215
Muzer
Avatar
718 posts
Running wine 1.7.11 right now, working fine except for the trainlist issues as previously mentioned. To get the trainlist to work at all, it is necessary to install Internet Explorer (you can use the script winetricks, available from the wine wiki, to do this easily - eg winetricks ie8)
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 17:18 #61225
MarkC
Avatar
1105 posts
I run Windows XP with SP3 and have the latest loader files (v4.0.31)

I have not experienced any problems

The only real difference with the end of life for XP is that MS no longer provide updates for it, it is still a main stream OS, (the same happened with win 9x support ended for that but it was still usable for many years afterwards, its only because main stream software and hardware manufactures stopped creating drivers and software for it did it die)

Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 17:55 #61226
Muzer
Avatar
718 posts
However, it does mean that security flaws in XP will go uncorrected. It's safely usable if you don't connect it to the internet and you also don't run untrusted software, of course, but aside from this special case, don't continue to use XP in the medium/long term. Sooner or later someone will find a flaw that can be exploited and you will get some horrible virus/malware of some description that uses your computer for illegal purposes/steals your data/holds your data to ransom/something else/all of the above.
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Forest Pines
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 18:07 #61227
postal
Avatar
5265 posts
" said:
However, it does mean that security flaws in XP will go uncorrected. It's safely usable if you don't connect it to the internet and you also don't run untrusted software, of course, but aside from this special case, don't continue to use XP in the medium/long term. Sooner or later someone will find a flaw that can be exploited and you will get some horrible virus/malware of some description that uses your computer for illegal purposes/steals your data/holds your data to ransom/something else/all of the above.
Like the computer experts told us the world was going to die on 01/01/2000? How much of that sort of frightener goes back to Microsoft and the manufacturers wanting us to buy new computers (particularly as I understand that Microsoft are getting major grief from the manufacturers because the market for desktops/laptops has collapsed following the techie-led revolution that is Windows 8).

“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 18:22 #61228
GW43125
Avatar
495 posts
Unless you have no WiFi, like me!
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 01/06/2014 at 19:04 #61229
Sacro
Avatar
1171 posts
" said:
Like the computer experts told us the world was going to die on 01/01/2000?


And it might well have happened had it not been for people spending time checking systems and fixing things so that it didn't. Now we've only got the big issue of 2038 which has already shown up with 30 year mortgages and such.

" said:
How much of that sort of frightener goes back to Microsoft and the manufacturers wanting us to buy new computers (particularly as I understand that Microsoft are getting major grief from the manufacturers because the market for desktops/laptops has collapsed following the techie-led revolution that is Windows 8).
You could say the same about the switch from unleaded petrol, or from incandescent light bulbs, at the end of the day, Windows XP will no longer get security patches, nor will people bring out new hardware or software designed to work with it. If the hardware is fine, then Linux will probably keep it going for a good many years, and be faster / more secure.

Unsure what you mean by 'techie-led', given that Microsoft is a company, not a single person.

Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 02/06/2014 at 04:22 #61236
BarryM
Avatar
2158 posts
" said:
However, it does mean that security flaws in XP will go uncorrected. It's safely usable if you don't connect it to the internet and you also don't run untrusted software, of course, but aside from this special case, don't continue to use XP in the medium/long term. Sooner or later someone will find a flaw that can be exploited and you will get some horrible virus/malware of some description that uses your computer for illegal purposes/steals your data/holds your data to ransom/something else/all of the above.
There are a number of Anti-virus/Malware software available still supporting XP (SP3).

Barry

Barry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 02/06/2014 at 09:23 #61241
Sacro
Avatar
1171 posts
" said:

There are a number of Anti-virus/Malware software available still supporting XP (SP3).

Barry
True, but when the base OS has security holes, you're still completely vulnerable

Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 02/06/2014 at 18:46 #61251
Lardybiker
Avatar
771 posts
Sacro is right.

Microsoft ceasing support does not mean XP will suddenly stop working...Far from it, in fact. However, what it does mean is that as time goes on, it will be become more and more vulnerable to security issues as security flaws will not fixed. Malware applications, firewalls and anti-virus software won't be able to offer any help or security for these types of issues (use of malware and anti-virus software in this situation is like locking the front door but leaving a window undone).

The year 2000 problem was a genuine issue. As Sacro said, there was a lot of work done to make sure the impact was as small as possible. It wasn't just PC's either as all sorts of equipment was affected. I know this first hand as I had to deal with testing the electronic equipment the company I worked for at the time was producing and making sure it would continue to work correctly after 01/01/2000 and fixing it if I found any problems. Even despite the work that was done, some systems were still affected. However, it would have been much, much worse if no-one had done anything.

Bottom line: There is nothing stopping you continuing to use XP and if you remain offline from the internet then there is no problem at all. However, if you do continue to use your XP machine on-line, regardless of what security software the machine may have, then you will become more and more vulnerable to potential security issues as time goes on.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Sacro
Linux vs Windows 02/06/2014 at 19:26 #61254
arabianights
Avatar
138 posts
I use SimSig under Linux (presently mostly Ubuntu 14.04 desktop) and it has been fine with one exception recently which I won't bore anyone with because it was a problem with WINE. Basically, there's no reason to not use it using Linux.

That said, as it doesn't seem to have been mentioned here, there is no reason in principle that you couldn't run your copy* of Windows XP in a virtual PC on Linux (I would recommend virtualbox in this case). Then you are guaranteed compatibility so long as Simsig supports Win XP, while being more or less immune (or close to it) to any nasties that that OS suffers (look up taking snapshots etc).

*By which I mean your licence, not an image of your current system... although you could do that too!

Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 02/06/2014 at 21:22 #61263
arabianights
Avatar
138 posts
also
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 02/06/2014 at 21:34 #61265
Danny252
Avatar
1461 posts
" said:
That said, as it doesn't seem to have been mentioned here, there is no reason in principle that you couldn't run your copy* of Windows XP in a virtual PC on Linux
How well does the average laptop/computer handle a virtual copy of something as big as XP? I know that it's certainly going to be slower than your proper OS, but quite how much slower I haven't a clue!

(By "big", I mean resource-heavy in comparison to something like Win 95/98 or a lightweight Linux distro - although XP is still a lot lighter than the later versions of Windows)

Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 03/06/2014 at 15:00 #61279
Lardybiker
Avatar
771 posts
I have a Windows 7 desktop at work with an XP VM which i use for softawre development and while XP is slower than if it was running natively, it's certainly usable. I've also used XP in a VM running under Ubuntu. Again, certainly usable.

Probably more telling though is my personal Windows 7 laptop. It has a 4-core i7 processor and an ATI 3D graphics card (I use it for playing games as I don't have a desktop) but more importantly, it has an XP VM that I specifically setup for all my SimSig development (well, I used to up until about 3 months ago). It runs SimSig without a hitch and you would hardly know it was a VM.

At the end of the day though, it depends on the hardware it's running on and the efficiency of the virtualization being used. If your machine supports Virtual Machine extensions then that definitely helps (you may need to check it's enabled in your machines BIOS).

Last edited: 03/06/2014 at 15:04 by Lardybiker
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 04/06/2014 at 22:48 #61314
slatteryc
Avatar
254 posts
In addition, disk IO rates help tremendously, especially if you have an SSD
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 05/06/2014 at 06:53 #61317
Hawk777
Avatar
386 posts
Note, the comments about system performance for running a VM are all true, but if you want to run under Linux and are willing to do the bit of work necessary to get WINE going, then it will run things much faster than a VM, particularly on slow computers, because there’s no second operating system running (just a fairly thin layer emulating the interfaces that Windows programs use), and everything is running directly on the CPU (unlike a VM on a CPU without virtualization extensions, where some parts of the VM code do not run directly on the CPU).
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 06/06/2014 at 18:01 #61398
Muzer
Avatar
718 posts
I think I'm right in thinking that most CPUs have virtualisation extensions nowadays.
Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 06/06/2014 at 20:11 #61406
Sacro
Avatar
1171 posts
" said:
I think I'm right in thinking that most CPUs have virtualisation extensions nowadays.
Hmm, as far as I'm aware all AMD ones do, it used to be Intel had some that did and some that didn't, that might not be the case these days.

Log in to reply
Linux vs Windows 06/06/2014 at 22:04 #61409
arabianights
Avatar
138 posts
" said:
" said:
That said, as it doesn't seem to have been mentioned here, there is no reason in principle that you couldn't run your copy* of Windows XP in a virtual PC on Linux
How well does the average laptop/computer handle a virtual copy of something as big as XP? I know that it's certainly going to be slower than your proper OS, but quite how much slower I haven't a clue!

(By "big", I mean resource-heavy in comparison to something like Win 95/98 or a lightweight Linux distro - although XP is still a lot lighter than the later versions of Windows)
I'm not sure what you mean by "average" but anything reasonably modern will run XP better (for the purposes of things like SimSig; this does not apply to something wanting low level hardware access [yes, hypothetical invisible pedants, I know this is not accurate, but it is the easiest way to explain it and think of it ]) than any of the real hardware ever did.

Ironically the main performance problems are running REALLY old stuff like windows 3.1 where it's quite a job to stop it using 100% CPU (unless you artificially throttle it) due to cooperative multitasking etc.

As others have said, any reasonably modern CPUs are well set up for virtualisation.

Log in to reply