Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Cambridge Island Platform - progress

You are here: Home > Forum > Miscellaneous > The real thing (anything else rail-oriented) > Cambridge Island Platform - progress

Page 1 of 2

Cambridge Island Platform - progress 14/09/2011 at 15:05 #20935
Rushey Platt
Avatar
55 posts
Hi

I took this photo this afternoon of Cambridge Island Platform this afternoon, which may be of interest to Simsiggers.

The Shovlin road-railers on the platform 7 line are shuffling up and down installing the platform canopy supports. 66720 is on the platform 8 line unloading materials.

(Incidentally, "Platform 7 Line" and "Platform 8 Line" will be the new official names of the lines.)

Rob

Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: UKTrainMan
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 14/09/2011 at 20:23 #20939
UKTrainMan
Avatar
1803 posts
Nice photo, thanks for sharing. Saw the progress of the work back in July when I was passing through and certainly looks different from what I remember.

" said:
66720 is on the platform 8 line unloading materials.
Probably deliberate too, makes the mess look better for the passengers!

Any views and / or opinions expressed by myself are from me personally and do not represent those of any company I either work for or am a consultant for.
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 15/09/2011 at 12:58 #20942
metcontrol
Avatar
227 posts
Haven't been to Cambridge station for years, and didn't know this was being built. Is the new platform going to be the same length as platforms 1+4 is ? Have services really increased so much that the station needs this extra capacity - or are there other plans to remove the bays?
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 15/09/2011 at 14:32 #20946
andrewf6672
Avatar
10 posts
Quote:
Haven't been to Cambridge station for years, and didn't know this was being built. Is the new platform going to be the same length as platforms 1+4 is ? Have services really increased so much that the station needs this extra capacity - or are there other plans to remove the bays?
The new island platforms will be 12 car length and no other platforms will close.This is needed because of longer London services.

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 15/09/2011 at 16:30 #20949
metcontrol
Avatar
227 posts
Thanks for that. Ah yes the planned longer services. Whilst an improvement for many on this line, they'll just take longer to pass through my local station
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 15/09/2011 at 17:17 #20951
Rushey Platt
Avatar
55 posts
Andrew is partially correct - only one of the new platforms is required to accommodate longer trains, so that 12-car trains can operate to both London terminals. The other is to cater for future growth in services.

The platforms are being built to accommodate 10-coach IEPs, which will be longer than 12-coach trains of standard length.

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 15/09/2011 at 18:45 #20953
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5402 posts
" said:
Thanks for that. Ah yes the planned longer services. Whilst an improvement for many on this line, they'll just take longer to pass through my local station :laugh:
We (on the GN main line) already have 12 coach FCC trains - not that they stop at Biggleswade. I understand that Letchworth will be one of the first to be extended.

Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 15/09/2011 at 18:53 #20954
Sam Tugwell
Avatar
494 posts
Also, 8 Car formations of the Class 379 units are becoming more common at Cambridge according to a Railway Magazine.

Tugz

"Signalman Exeter"
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 15/09/2011 at 20:23 #20955
UKTrainMan
Avatar
1803 posts
Two articles on RailNetwork.info about this.

Network Rail submits plans for Cambridge

New platform and bridge for Cambridge

Three articles from Rail.co about this.

New platforms and footbridge at Cambridge station given the go ahead

Council grants permission for Network Rail improvements between Cambridge and London

Network Rail nets £2m property deal for Cambridge station refurbishment

The second one above (from Rail.co) mentions at the start of the 3[sup]rd[/sup] paragraph the following:

Quote:
Adding two new 270m bi-directional platforms – numbered 7 and 8

Any views and / or opinions expressed by myself are from me personally and do not represent those of any company I either work for or am a consultant for.
Last edited: 15/09/2011 at 20:24 by UKTrainMan
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 16:27 #20971
metcontrol
Avatar
227 posts
" said:
We (on the GN main line) already have 12 coach FCC trains - not that they stop at Biggleswade. I understand that Letchworth will be one of the first to be extended.

Peter
Letchworth is undergoing the extension works now - though they appear to be painfully slow works despite being worked on during the daytime behind physical barriers. With no delay to work through its proximity to the line, you would think they could lay more than half a dozen bricks a day.
I doubt Baldock will ever get such treatment

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 16:31 #20972
Rushey Platt
Avatar
55 posts
It's nice to see the PR on the project is under control and accurate!
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 17:01 #20973
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5402 posts
" said:

..you would think they could lay more than half a dozen bricks a day.
Sounds like what my wife says about my bricklaying in the back garden.

Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 17:06 #20974
Rushey Platt
Avatar
55 posts
" said:
Letchworth is undergoing the extension works now - though they appear to be painfully slow works despite being worked on during the daytime behind physical barriers. With no delay to work through its proximity to the line, you would think they could lay more than half a dozen bricks a day.
I doubt Baldock will ever get such treatment :(
The workers at Letchworth seem to spend most of their time either sitting around on the grass or ambling from one end of the platform to the other!

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 18:05 #20976
lpeters
Avatar
160 posts
Sounds like my kinda job. :)

I don't see the point in Letchworth getting the 12 car upgrade. I think it would make more sense for the 12 cars to run KLN, CBG, RYS, SVG, KGX in peak; and KLN, CBG, SVG, STP, and the south off-peak. Serves the major stations along the line and that way every station between CBG and SVG is within a reasonable distance of a big train during rush hour.

In fact, very few 12 cars stop at SVG; most 12-cars run non-stop KGX to PBO or CBG or occasionally stop at SVG, sometimes BIW, HUN, SDY and SNO. And towards CBG occasionally SVG and RYS.

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 18:16 #20978
Rushey Platt
Avatar
55 posts
" said:
I don't see the point in Letchworth getting the 12 car upgrade.
I do! But then I commute from LET

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 18:24 #20979
lpeters
Avatar
160 posts
What Letchworth needs more than anything else is a 3rd platform - although I don't think there's anywhere to put one? for the 313 reversing moves.

Increase capacity through Letchworth station and along with the Hitchin Flyover; that's half the battle won.

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 18:34 #20980
Rushey Platt
Avatar
55 posts
" said:
What Letchworth needs more than anything else is a 3rd platform - although I don't think there's anywhere to put one? for the 313 reversing moves.

Actually, Letchworth was built to be upgraded to two island platforms when finance permitted, but the 3rd and 4th tracks were never built. That's why there are platform canopies on both sides.

However, platform extensions have put paid to that ever happening.

Rob

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 18:40 #20983
metcontrol
Avatar
227 posts
What Letchworth really needs is more of the evening peak "first-stop Letchworth" services (xx15, xx45 ex KX) that then go on to stop at Baldock. That way I wouldn't have to get off at Letchworth (along with several others) and await the very slow following service. Sorry am I being a bit selfish now
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 18:40 #20984
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5402 posts
" said:
What Letchworth needs more than anything else is a 3rd platform - although I don't think there's anywhere to put one? for the 313 reversing moves.
I've often wondered if Letchworth had platform loops at one time, I don't think it did but there's something about the way the platform buildings are designed and positioned that gives the impression.

Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 18:43 #20985
Rushey Platt
Avatar
55 posts
" said:
What Letchworth really needs is more of the evening peak "first-stop Letchworth" services (xx15, xx45 ex KX) that then go on to stop at Baldock. That way I wouldn't have to get off at Letchworth (along with several others) and await the very slow following service. Sorry am I being a bit selfish now :laugh:

Yeah, I often see people getting off the fasts and hanging about. Mind you, I often do the same at Hitchin by getting the XX10s or XX40s that stop there. 12 coaches so lots of seats.

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 18:44 #20986
Rushey Platt
Avatar
55 posts
" said:
I've often wondered if Letchworth had platform loops at one time, I don't think it did but there's something about the way the platform buildings are designed and positioned that gives the impression.

Peter

See my post of 1934 above ^^^

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 19:00 #20987
ajax103
Avatar
1120 posts
" said:
Sounds like my kinda job. :)

I don't see the point in Letchworth getting the 12 car upgrade. I think it would make more sense for the 12 cars to run KLN, CBG, RYS, SVG, KGX in peak; and KLN, CBG, SVG, STP, and the south off-peak. Serves the major stations along the line and that way every station between CBG and SVG is within a reasonable distance of a big train during rush hour.

In fact, very few 12 cars stop at SVG; most 12-cars run non-stop KGX to PBO or CBG or occasionally stop at SVG, sometimes BIW, HUN, SDY and SNO. And towards CBG occasionally SVG and RYS.

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 19:04 #20988
ajax103
Avatar
1120 posts
" said:
Sounds like my kinda job. :)

I don't see the point in Letchworth getting the 12 car upgrade. I think it would make more sense for the 12 cars to run KLN, CBG, RYS, SVG, KGX in peak; and KLN, CBG, SVG, STP, and the south off-peak. Serves the major stations along the line and that way every station between CBG and SVG is within a reasonable distance of a big train during rush hour.

In fact, very few 12 cars stop at SVG; most 12-cars run non-stop KGX to PBO or CBG or occasionally stop at SVG, sometimes BIW, HUN, SDY and SNO. And towards CBG occasionally SVG and RYS.
One small problem though, Biggleswade can only take trains of up to 8 cars long - 12 car trains do not stop at Biggleswade at the moment.

The 12 car services to Kings Cross in the morning peak only call at Huntingdon, St Neots and Stevenage while the 12 cars to Peterborough in the evening peak only call at Hitchin, St Neots and Huntingdon.

12 car services on the Cambridge branch line join/divide at either Cambridge or Royston depending on the time of day.

Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 19:28 #20990
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5402 posts
" said:
Sounds like my kinda job. :)

I don't see the point in Letchworth getting the 12 car upgrade. I think it would make more sense for the 12 cars to run KLN, CBG, RYS, SVG, KGX in peak; and KLN, CBG, SVG, STP, and the south off-peak. Serves the major stations along the line and that way every station between CBG and SVG is within a reasonable distance of a big train during rush hour.

In fact, very few 12 cars stop at SVG; most 12-cars run non-stop KGX to PBO or CBG or occasionally stop at SVG, sometimes BIW, HUN, SDY and SNO. And towards CBG occasionally SVG and RYS.
I believe the OH north of Cambridge (or maybe it's Ely) can't support 12 (or even 8?) coach trains.

Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
Re: Cambridge Island Platform - progress 16/09/2011 at 19:36 #20994
Rushey Platt
Avatar
55 posts
" said:
I believe the OH north of Cambridge (or maybe it's Ely) can't support 12 (or even 8?) coach trains

The OLE restrictions are no more than 5 x 4-car units between Milton FS and Littleport, and the same number between Littleport and Lynn.

North of Cambridge only Ely can take 12-coach trains, but taking that with the the OLE restrictions the de-facto limit is 8 coaches. Plus 8-coach trains can't serve the smaller stations (unless they are 379s).

All a result of the Lynn electrification being done on the cheap!

Log in to reply