Page 1 of 1
| Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 30/01/2012 at 09:58 #28430 | |
maxand
1637 posts |
Of all the shunt signals, K244 has Interpose disabled. Would there be any specific reason for this or could it be a bug? Just a minor point. Thanks. Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 30/01/2012 at 10:28 #28431 | |
|
Firefly
521 posts |
It obviously doesn't have a berth in reality, many sidings don't. Are we covering old ground here? FF Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 30/01/2012 at 10:32 #28432 | |
|
sloppyjag
480 posts |
Previous version of Royston did have a TD berth there so either an omission or a correction in the new version.
Planotransitophobic! Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 30/01/2012 at 16:58 #28438 | |
Steamer
4034 posts |
I don't know why you can't interpose at K244, but to get around it just interpose into K253. The TD will 'step' correctly for a train leaving the loop in either direction.
"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Last edited: 30/01/2012 at 16:59 by Steamer Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 31/01/2012 at 07:24 #28451 | |
|
maxand
1637 posts |
Thanks all who responded. Perhaps the most likely reason is that there is only enough room on the Down Loop for one berth, not two, therefore this can only be owned by one signal, K253. Last edited: 31/01/2012 at 07:44 by maxand Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 31/01/2012 at 08:34 #28452 | |
|
AndyG
1857 posts |
might even be a shared berth.
I can only help one person a day. Today's not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look too good either. Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 31/01/2012 at 10:01 #28453 | |
|
maxand
1637 posts |
If a shared berth, wouldn't that mean one could interpose from either signal?
Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 31/01/2012 at 11:30 #28456 | |
|
mfcooper
707 posts |
" said:If a shared berth, wouldn't that mean one could interpose from either signal?At work, we have a fair number of shunt signals that share a berth with a main aspect signal in the opposite direction. At *none* of these is it possible to interpose a TD using the shunt signal number - we have to use the main aspect number. In most circumstances, this TD will step from the shunt signal as normal, but not always. Log in to reply The following user said thank you: maxand |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 31/01/2012 at 11:53 #28457 | |
GeoffM
6416 posts |
" said:" said:That's odd. With dual address berths do you have to interpose into the "correct" berth for CSR set up to work? (eg Wimbledon, if that is actually a dual address berth and not two berths displayed as one)If a shared berth, wouldn't that mean one could interpose from either signal?At work, we have a fair number of shunt signals that share a berth with a main aspect signal in the opposite direction. At *none* of these is it possible to interpose a TD using the shunt signal number - we have to use the main aspect number. In most circumstances, this TD will step from the shunt signal as normal, but not always. SimSig Boss Log in to reply The following user said thank you: maxand |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 01/02/2012 at 04:03 #28514 | |
|
maxand
1637 posts |
On a simpler note, are there any sims in which two (shunt?) signals share a berth?
Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 01/02/2012 at 06:37 #28522 | |
BarryM
2158 posts |
" said:On a simpler note, are there any sims in which two (shunt?) signals share a berth?Yes. Barry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 01/02/2012 at 19:05 #28590 | |
|
clive
2823 posts |
" said:Of all the shunt signals, K244 has Interpose disabled. Would there be any specific reason for this or could it be a bug?It's a bug. Log in to reply |
| Re: Royston signal K244 lacks interpose 01/02/2012 at 19:08 #28591 | |
|
clive
2823 posts |
" said:Thanks all who responded. Perhaps the most likely reason is that there is only enough room on the Down Loop for one berth, not two, therefore this can only be owned by one signal, K253.Not so: more than one signal can own a berth. The berth is actually called "K244" in the data; the lack of interpose is a bug caused by the way that the loop sidings are implemented (don't ask). Log in to reply |