Page 1 of 1
Position of train standing at Hitchin reversal shunt-232 07/11/2013 at 17:25 #50962 | |
indian_railways_fan
72 posts |
I have 8Z03 standing for reversal at shunt 232 at Hitchin.However it appears to be standing on the wrong track circuit.It has gone beyond the immediate TC in rear of Shunt-232 and to the next one in line,thereby also releasing the locking on the point for the flyover.As a result it is also possible to swing the points to the flyover which could lead to a derailment(I know it is not possible in Simsig but just pointing it out): Khalid. Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Log in to reply |
Position of train standing at Hitchin reversal shunt-232 07/11/2013 at 18:41 #50970 | |
UKTrainMan
1803 posts |
Confirmed as a bug, will add to bug board now. Also found another bug in the process, so thanks for this! B) Any views and / or opinions expressed by myself are from me personally and do not represent those of any company I either work for or am a consultant for. Log in to reply |
Position of train standing at Hitchin reversal shunt-232 07/11/2013 at 19:26 #50974 | |
Finger
220 posts |
Quote:As a result it is also possible to swing the points to the flyover which could lead to a derailmentIs it such a big deal? I mean, situations like this are common in SimSig (eg. North Wales Coast) and usually the train driver just calls the signaler to ensure he has the points locked. So given everyone is behaving normally, it shouldn't lead to derailment. Log in to reply |
Position of train standing at Hitchin reversal shunt-232 07/11/2013 at 19:32 #50975 | |
UKTrainMan
1803 posts |
" said:Quote:It wouldn't lead to a derailment anyway as SimSig as a rule do not simulate such a thing. If you try to send a train towards trailing points set against it, I believe the core code now features calls from the driver to advise you (the signaller) of this.As a result it is also possible to swing the points to the flyover which could lead to a derailmentIs it such a big deal? I mean, situations like this are common in SimSig (eg. North Wales Coast) and usually the train driver just calls the signaler to ensure he has the points locked. So given everyone is behaving normally, it shouldn't lead to derailment. Any views and / or opinions expressed by myself are from me personally and do not represent those of any company I either work for or am a consultant for. Log in to reply |
Position of train standing at Hitchin reversal shunt-232 07/11/2013 at 20:03 #50979 | |
Danny252
1461 posts |
" said:" said:Well, yes, yes, I think we all know what he means!Quote:It wouldn't lead to a derailment anyway as SimSig as a rule do not simulate such a thing.As a result it is also possible to swing the points to the flyover which could lead to a derailmentIs it such a big deal? I mean, situations like this are common in SimSig (eg. North Wales Coast) and usually the train driver just calls the signaler to ensure he has the points locked. So given everyone is behaving normally, it shouldn't lead to derailment. Quote: If you try to send a train towards trailing points set against it, I believe the core code now features calls from the driver to advise you (the signaller) of this.Ooh, so no more of the silent "out of valid track" thingy? Lovely. (Though again, you shouldn't ever get it if you do it correctly!) Last edited: 07/11/2013 at 20:04 by Danny252 Log in to reply |
Position of train standing at Hitchin reversal shunt-232 07/11/2013 at 21:53 #50987 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
" said:Quote:Would you care to elaborate on where this happens on NWC?As a result it is also possible to swing the points to the flyover which could lead to a derailmentIs it such a big deal? I mean, situations like this are common in SimSig (eg. North Wales Coast) and usually the train driver just calls the signaler to ensure he has the points locked. So given everyone is behaving normally, it shouldn't lead to derailment. "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |