Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Whoops!

You are here: Home > Forum > Miscellaneous > The real thing (anything else rail-oriented) > Whoops!

Page 1 of 1

Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 17:42 #51779
welshdragon
Avatar
315 posts
20.11.13: 221105 working the 10.10 Euston to Chester service slid into the buffers at Chester Platform 1.

image

Seems to be due to poor adhesion, although quite how that is possible on a bay platform with no foliage nearby begs the question, Maybe the driver overcooked it?

Last edited: 20/11/2013 at 17:46 by welshdragon
Log in to reply
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 17:59 #51781
Steamer
Avatar
3984 posts
" said:

Seems to be due to poor adhesion, although quite how that is possible on a bay platform with no foliage nearby begs the question, Maybe the driver overcooked it?
If the area approaching Chester had poor adhesion, wouldn't some of the leaf mush be transferred onto the wheel, resulting in slipping?

"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q)
Log in to reply
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 18:24 #51782
jimgos2005
Avatar
129 posts
I would imagine that this would be quite possible but still a little tricky to overshoot when in my experience all bay platforms have a 5/10M.P.H speed on the approach
Log in to reply
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 18:26 #51783
AndyG
Avatar
1842 posts
Online
Please don't speculate without knowing the circumstances.
I can only help one person a day. Today's not your day. Tomorrow doesn't look too good either.
Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: Sam Tugwell, postal, DriverCurran, Stephen Fulcher
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 18:39 #51785
lazzer
Avatar
634 posts
" said:
Please don't speculate without knowing the circumstances.

To be fair, it's not really possible to speculate once you're in possession of the facts ... :whistle:

Log in to reply
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 18:50 #51786
postal
Avatar
5264 posts
" said:
" said:
Please don't speculate without knowing the circumstances.

To be fair, it's not really possible to speculate once you're in possession of the facts ... :whistle:
As any lawyer will tell you, facts and circumstances are two totally different things which is why it is always more difficult to get a conviction if you only have circumstantial evidence.

“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe
Log in to reply
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 18:52 #51787
welshdragon
Avatar
315 posts
sorry, this wasn't meant to be a speculative thread, more pointing out a current event!
Log in to reply
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 20:03 #51792
john havenhand
Avatar
58 posts
I happen to know the driver 65 years and had no previous incidents so thinking most likely poor adhesion
:cheer:

one way to get rid of a voyager though

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: welshdragon
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 21:26 #51793
welshdragon
Avatar
315 posts
" said:
I happen to know the driver 65 years and had no previous incidents so thinking most likely poor adhesion
:cheer:

one way to get rid of a voyager though
or create a new through platform at Chester :lol:

Log in to reply
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 21:48 #51794
Steam14xx
Avatar
1 posts
Lol, woopsies :blink: , thats a bit of a fail. :lol:
Log in to reply
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 22:55 #51796
Class 92
Avatar
359 posts
" said:
" said:
I happen to know the driver 65 years and had no previous incidents so thinking most likely poor adhesion
:cheer:

one way to get rid of a voyager though
or create a new through platform at Chester :lol:
Or extension.

Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: welshdragon, jetblast787
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 23:01 #51797
sloppyjag
Avatar
480 posts
Online
I love the fact that the destination blind has, rather optimistically, been changed to "Euston".
Planotransitophobic!
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: jetblast787
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 23:10 #51798
clive
Avatar
2789 posts
" said:
I would imagine that this would be quite possible but still a little tricky to overshoot when in my experience all bay platforms have a 5/10M.P.H speed on the approach
A driver friend of mine suddenly found he had no braking available three or four miles out of Skegness (IIRC). The wheels picked up again *just* in time to stop before the buffers, but any speed limit on the approach would have no effect.

And there was that overrun in Kent a year or two back which went for a few miles.

Log in to reply
Whoops! 20/11/2013 at 23:24 #51799
headshot119
Avatar
4869 posts
I've just come back from Liverpool and went to have a look again on my way through Chester.

Platform 3A has been cordoned off (For those who aren't familiar Platform 1 where the incident took place is the Euston facing bay platform accessed by passengers via 3A), lots of blinking stop boards evident. The front coach of the voyager is angled upwards.

57308 was sat on the through road, then moved off towards Crewe, I'll take a stab they'll use it to drag the Voyager clear, unfortunately I had to catch my train so couldn't stay to watch.

Thoughts to the driver, and the rest of the crew. Being involved in any incident no matter how minor on a railway is never a nice feeling, even when it's through no fault of your own.

"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer
Log in to reply
Whoops! 21/11/2013 at 00:42 #51804
Hooverman
Avatar
306 posts
If its like my route then not only will the driver be d&a so will the signaller. Having been through that process when you've nothing wrong, just so all the tick boxes are ticked is not nice. Thoughts with the passengers and railway staff involved. That's why I will never speculate in a public forum.
Log in to reply
Whoops! 21/11/2013 at 09:05 #51810
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5402 posts
Link posted on Scot-rail relating to an earlier incident at Chester. Bit more of a mess there.

Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: GoodbyeMrFish
Whoops! 21/11/2013 at 16:49 #51824
onlydjw
Avatar
456 posts
One of the emergency re-railing vehicles was reported on site this morning to re-rail it.
God bless, Daniel Wilson
Log in to reply
Whoops! 21/11/2013 at 21:35 #51835
pbinnersley
Avatar
431 posts
" said:
Link posted on Scot-rail relating to an earlier incident at Chester. Bit more of a mess there.

Peter
Thanks for the link Peter. I've always wondered why there was an isolated section of canopy over the east end bays.

Peter.

Log in to reply
Whoops! 09/12/2013 at 14:59 #52574
northroad
Avatar
872 posts
I see from the RAIB alert today that they are looking at the rail adhesion problems that were encountered as the train entered Chester station. Will be interesting to see what the final report shows but they are also looking at the buffer arrangement in the bay.

Geoff

Log in to reply
Whoops! 09/12/2013 at 15:21 #52576
pedroathome
Avatar
915 posts
Online
" said:
I see from the RAIB alert today that they are looking at the rail adhesion problems that were encountered as the train entered Chester station. Will be interesting to see what the final report shows but they are also looking at the buffer arrangement in the bay.

Geoff
A link

http://www.raib.gov.uk/publications/current_investigations_register/131120_chester.cfm

James

Log in to reply