Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Replacing signals when a train is approaching

You are here: Home > Forum > General > General questions, comments, and issues > Replacing signals when a train is approaching

Page 4 of 5

Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 08:07 #62293
dwelham313
Avatar
139 posts
" said:
" said:


Waterbeach doesn't have a TRTS plunger but a seperate set of 'treadles' which become active when 'stopping' is selected. Once the train departs the station and activates this treadle the barrier sequence starts and the signal clears after about 15 seconds.
Are you sure about that? My understanding was that it is triggered by occupation of the platform track circuit for 30 seconds (possibly with a treadle as backup). I'm sure I've seen the signal clear before the train departs.
Hi Clive, yes im pretty sure although you've planted the seed of doubt now! Some of the PM peak services are extremely busy from Cambridge and we stop at Waterbeach for a lot longer than 30 seconds and the signal never clears.

If you depart and accelerate to quicker than about 15/20mph you'll be stopped at the protecting signal whilst the barriers are lowering. Im driving up there twice this afternoon so i'll do a little investigation!

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 08:13 #62294
clive
Avatar
2799 posts
" said:

When we do annual tests on these crossings all the timers have to be checked very closely. There is only a ten per cent tolerance in the standards, which does not leave any room for variation at all on some of them, which can be as little as three or four seconds.
I'm not disputing that; my point was simply that it's line speed, not train speed, that is used for that timing. I think we're on the same page here.

Quote:

Where you have crossings close to stations and stop/non-stop controls such as Bradford-on-Avon, the protecting signal will generally be allowed to clear once the barriers themselves have started to lower.
The moment at which the signal clears will depend on how far it is from the crossing. It's calculated so that a train braking to a halt at the signal, seeing it change, and then accelerating towards the crossing will arrive no earlier than the 27 second point, no matter where it is when the signal clears. It took me a fair amount of algebra to get this right - email me if you want details.

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 11:42 #62307
Stephen Fulcher
Avatar
2089 posts
Online
I did mention line speed in the initial post that was questioned, nothing to do with the speed of the train.

With the stop/non-stop, the road lights etc will start with 27 seconds warning time for the crossing, but I was referring to at what point in the cycle the protecting signal will be allowed to clear.

I spent some time in the last couple of weeks with a very experienced level crossing engineer and we were discussing these things.

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 13:32 #62310
Forest Pines
Avatar
525 posts
I am intrigued with the minimum 27 second time, because I'm sure that an AHB I used to drive my car across regularly violates it.

The crossing is at Great Coates station, and on the Down line the crossing is immediately off the platform end - the signal is also at the platform end, only a few feet from the crossing.

The sequence I've witnessed several times is: train draws to a stand in the station with the barriers up, sequence starts and barriers lower, then train starts as soon as the barriers are down and is on the crossing almost immediately. Being a car driver I can't tell you the signal aspect, but I really don't think there is 27 seconds from the amber road light coming on to the train being on the crossing.

(it's entirely possible my subjective timing memory is wrong of course. I think it's a horribly dangerous crossing for other reasons - at rush hour it regularly has road traffic backed up across it)

Last edited: 30/06/2014 at 13:38 by Forest Pines
Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 14:45 #62315
KymriskaDraken
Avatar
963 posts
" said:


(it's I think it's a horribly dangerous crossing for other reasons - at rush hour it regularly has road traffic backed up across it)
Is that not in contravention of the Road Traffic Acts?

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Stephen Fulcher
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 18:11 #62330
Stephen Fulcher
Avatar
2089 posts
Online
Anyone who stops on a crossing should't retain their driving licence. Incredibly dangerous.
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Hooverman
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 18:53 #62331
postal
Avatar
5269 posts
" said:
Anyone who stops on a crossing should't retain their driving licence. Incredibly dangerous.
. . .and half of them will be using their mobiles at the same time.

Same situation as Great Coates on Redcar Lane in Cleveland. Right turn immediately after the crossing so cars following someone signalling right keep going until they are on the crossing and only then engage their brains to realise that they are going to have to stop. Serve them right if one of the Boulby potash trains flattened them.

“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe
Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 19:38 #62332
Late Turn
Avatar
699 posts
Whilst I have no sympathy whatsoever for those who blindly drive onto a crossing when their exit is clearly blocked (and even less sympathy for those who drive with a mobile phone pressed against their ear!), there are some locations where the road layout means that it's inevitable that even well-driven vehicles will block the crossing at some point. One of the crossings (CCTV, in this case - at Luffenham, if anyone wants to look at it in Streetview) on our patch has a right turn into an industrial unit immediately after the crossing, close enough that an HGV waiting (for oncoming traffic) to turn into the unit will be foul of the crossing - even if the driver stopped short of the crossing to wait for a gap in traffic, there's no guarantee that he'll be able to make the turn by the time he's negotiated the crossing and reached the junction! Another example is somewhere on the Southern (possibly Wokingham?) where the crossing is immediately followed by a roundabout - any long-ish vehicle stopped waiting for an opportunity to enter the roundabout will, again, be foul of the crossing. That's exactly why AHBs are only permitted where the road layout (and other factors) meet strict criteria!
Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 19:51 #62334
jc92
Avatar
3701 posts
Online
" said:
Whilst I have no sympathy whatsoever for those who blindly drive onto a crossing when their exit is clearly blocked (and even less sympathy for those who drive with a mobile phone pressed against their ear!), there are some locations where the road layout means that it's inevitable that even well-driven vehicles will block the crossing at some point. One of the crossings (CCTV, in this case - at Luffenham, if anyone wants to look at it in Streetview) on our patch has a right turn into an industrial unit immediately after the crossing, close enough that an HGV waiting (for oncoming traffic) to turn into the unit will be foul of the crossing - even if the driver stopped short of the crossing to wait for a gap in traffic, there's no guarantee that he'll be able to make the turn by the time he's negotiated the crossing and reached the junction! Another example is somewhere on the Southern (possibly Wokingham?) where the crossing is immediately followed by a roundabout - any long-ish vehicle stopped waiting for an opportunity to enter the roundabout will, again, be foul of the crossing. That's exactly why AHBs are only permitted where the road layout (and other factors) meet strict criteria!
Kiveton Park LC is another example of this, being built right on a T-Junction. the Wig Wags actually face in either direction, rather than straight forward because of this.

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 20:37 #62335
GeoffM
Avatar
6380 posts
In the US and probably elsewhere they have traffic light preemption. This is an early warning from a level crossing (grade crossing) that a train is approaching and alters the traffic light sequence to release any trapped vehicles on the crossing. Not sure if that's done in the UK.

Bradford-on-Avon town council did a good one at Greenland Mills AHB. They narrowed the road in such a way that a car waiting on one side of the crossing would block the exit of a car coming the other way. It didn't last long.

SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 20:48 #62336
Firefly
Avatar
521 posts
The crossing must be closed for 10 secs prior to the train a arriving. (Although I'm struggling to find a reference for that in the latest standards)

The 27 seconds is made up of:

0 - 3 Secs = Yellow Lights
3 - 7 Secs = Red Road Lights
7 - 17 Secs = Barriers Lowering (Worst Case)
Give 10 seconds of road closure time prior to train arriving at the crossing.

FF

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 21:11 #62337
TomOF
Avatar
452 posts
" said:
I am intrigued with the minimum 27 second time, because I'm sure that an AHB I used to drive my car across regularly violates it.

The crossing is at Great Coates station, and on the Down line the crossing is immediately off the platform end - the signal is also at the platform end, only a few feet from the crossing.

The sequence I've witnessed several times is: train draws to a stand in the station with the barriers up, sequence starts and barriers lower, then train starts as soon as the barriers are down and is on the crossing almost immediately. Being a car driver I can't tell you the signal aspect, but I really don't think there is 27 seconds from the amber road light coming on to the train being on the crossing.

(it's entirely possible my subjective timing memory is wrong of course. I think it's a horribly dangerous crossing for other reasons - at rush hour it regularly has road traffic backed up across it)
It would be mitigated by the fact that a train is starting from a stop and presumably wouldn't proceed if a car is straddling the crossing right in front of it. In the case of stopping trains I'd imagine the signal won't clear until the barriers are proved down which gets rid of the risk of a train appearing with little warning. I grew up in the area and at the time the crossing was modernised in the late 80's the housing estate on the up side of the line wasn't there, Neither was Europarc and in general I don't think traffic was so heavy.


I suspect it wouldn't get commissioned as an AHB today.

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 21:17 #62338
Firefly
Avatar
521 posts
Quote:
I'd imagine the signal won't clear until the barriers are proved down which gets rid of the risk of a train appearing with little warning.
Tom, as has been said that's not the case with AHB's. The signal will clear when the sequence has been initiated for long enough to prevent the train arriving before 27 seconds. If starting from a stand this is very likely to be around 10 seconds after the crossing sequence has initiated. (As Clive said actual timings depend on the distance from signal to crossing.)

FF

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 21:18 #62339
Hooverman
Avatar
306 posts
" said:
In the US and probably elsewhere they have traffic light preemption. This is an early warning from a level crossing (grade crossing) that a train is approaching and alters the traffic light sequence to release any trapped vehicles on the crossing. Not sure if that's done in the UK.

Bradford-on-Avon town council did a good one at Greenland Mills AHB. They narrowed the road in such a way that a car waiting on one side of the crossing would block the exit of a car coming the other way. It didn't last long.
It's called phased advanced. We have a hurry button on Crawley High Street CCTV on our panel 7 which when pressed causes the road traffic lights at the road junction immediately beyond the crossing to advance though the sequence to give the traffic coming over the crossing a green road traffic signal to clear the crossing. We also have a sealed key release to turn the road traffic lights off, only to be used in extreme circumstances of which we've never had to do that in the 13 years I've been at TBASC. I also believe Lancing has one for one of their CCTV crossings.

Getting back to N/S selectors we have one for Parsonage Road AHBs for trains calling at Littlehaven or not, set on "N" and the signal clears straight away set on "S" and there is a delayed clearance based on TC occupation.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: GeoffM
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 22:21 #62340
LucasLCC
Avatar
94 posts
In the case of Red Cow crossing, not enough time is given between the crossing siren going off and the barriers being fully lowered to allow pedestrians to cross. It also doesn't account for the rather busy junction on the St Davids side of the crossing.

The time allowed surely cannot take into account that a pedestrian may have to cross up to six lines (especially if they've literally only just got on the crossing when the siren goes off) and get off the crossing. It would be worse for anyone that couldn't walk at a reasonable speed..

And whilst during daytime hours we have a crossing attendant (0600 - 2200 I believe) that will allow pedestrians to cross after the barriers have lowered, outside these hours I think the crossing is rather dangerous.

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 22:43 #62341
Muzer
Avatar
718 posts
" said:
" said:
In the US and probably elsewhere they have traffic light preemption. This is an early warning from a level crossing (grade crossing) that a train is approaching and alters the traffic light sequence to release any trapped vehicles on the crossing. Not sure if that's done in the UK.

Bradford-on-Avon town council did a good one at Greenland Mills AHB. They narrowed the road in such a way that a car waiting on one side of the crossing would block the exit of a car coming the other way. It didn't last long.
It's called phased advanced. We have a hurry button on Crawley High Street CCTV on our panel 7 which when pressed causes the road traffic lights at the road junction immediately beyond the crossing to advance though the sequence to give the traffic coming over the crossing a green road traffic signal to clear the crossing. We also have a sealed key release to turn the road traffic lights off, only to be used in extreme circumstances of which we've never had to do that in the 13 years I've been at TBASC. I also believe Lancing has one for one of their CCTV crossings.

Getting back to N/S selectors we have one for Parsonage Road AHBs for trains calling at Littlehaven or not, set on "N" and the signal clears straight away set on "S" and there is a delayed clearance based on TC occupation.
Turn them off? What good would that do?

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 22:59 #62342
Hooverman
Avatar
306 posts
" said:
" said:
" said:
In the US and probably elsewhere they have traffic light preemption. This is an early warning from a level crossing (grade crossing) that a train is approaching and alters the traffic light sequence to release any trapped vehicles on the crossing. Not sure if that's done in the UK.

Bradford-on-Avon town council did a good one at Greenland Mills AHB. They narrowed the road in such a way that a car waiting on one side of the crossing would block the exit of a car coming the other way. It didn't last long.
It's called phased advanced. We have a hurry button on Crawley High Street CCTV on our panel 7 which when pressed causes the road traffic lights at the road junction immediately beyond the crossing to advance though the sequence to give the traffic coming over the crossing a green road traffic signal to clear the crossing. We also have a sealed key release to turn the road traffic lights off, only to be used in extreme circumstances of which we've never had to do that in the 13 years I've been at TBASC. I also believe Lancing has one for one of their CCTV crossings.

Getting back to N/S selectors we have one for Parsonage Road AHBs for trains calling at Littlehaven or not, set on "N" and the signal clears straight away set on "S" and there is a delayed clearance based on TC occupation.
Turn them off? What good would that do?
God knows, never had to use it, but someone must of thought it was a good idea on paper way back in the early 80s when the scheme was designed! :-)

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 30/06/2014 at 23:55 #62343
dwelham313
Avatar
139 posts
" said:
" said:
" said:


Waterbeach doesn't have a TRTS plunger but a seperate set of 'treadles' which become active when 'stopping' is selected. Once the train departs the station and activates this treadle the barrier sequence starts and the signal clears after about 15 seconds.
Are you sure about that? My understanding was that it is triggered by occupation of the platform track circuit for 30 seconds (possibly with a treadle as backup). I'm sure I've seen the signal clear before the train departs.
Hi Clive, yes im pretty sure although you've planted the seed of doubt now! Some of the PM peak services are extremely busy from Cambridge and we stop at Waterbeach for a lot longer than 30 seconds and the signal never clears.

If you depart and accelerate to quicker than about 15/20mph you'll be stopped at the protecting signal whilst the barriers are lowering. Im driving up there twice this afternoon so i'll do a little investigation!
Okay, so the first trip I arrived into the station TC at 15:28:03 and carried out station duties passing over the treadle at 15:29:04, the signal cleared at 15:29:25.

Second trip; into the platform at 19:56:41, over treadle at 19:57:49, signal cleared at 19:58:09.

Obviously these timings are just two trips and no serious results can be drawn from them, but it re-affirms my belief that the crossing sequence is started by the treadle, and not by TC occupancy.

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 01/07/2014 at 05:49 #62344
Stephen Fulcher
Avatar
2089 posts
Online
With AHBs there is usually a pair of strike in treadles at the extreme end of one track circuit, and either track occupied or one of the treadles down will initiate the sequence. Is there a block joint by your treadles?

TomF, I don't think any AHBs are allowed to be commissioned any more, irrespective of the intricacies in road and railway layouts.

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 01/07/2014 at 06:21 #62345
GW43125
Avatar
495 posts
" said:
With AHBs there is usually a pair of strike in treadles at the extreme end of one track circuit, and either track occupied or one of the treadles down will initiate the sequence. Is there a block joint by your treadles?

TomF, I don't think any AHBs are allowed to be commissioned any more, irrespective of the intricacies in road and railway layouts.
I think instead you have to install an ABCL (basically the same thing but with Obstacle Detection and ERTMS capable).

Hope this helps,
Jamie.

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 01/07/2014 at 07:03 #62346
Late Turn
Avatar
699 posts
" said:
" said:
With AHBs there is usually a pair of strike in treadles at the extreme end of one track circuit, and either track occupied or one of the treadles down will initiate the sequence. Is there a block joint by your treadles?

TomF, I don't think any AHBs are allowed to be commissioned any more, irrespective of the intricacies in road and railway layouts.
I think instead you have to install an ABCL (basically the same thing but with Obstacle Detection and ERTMS capable).

Hope this helps,
Jamie.

Rather wide of the mark there, I'm afraid - an ABCL is rather a different beast, in operation, to an AHB, and only really suitable for relatively quiet roads (I think there were/are limits on the road traffic levels, and possibly rail traffic levels too). They rely on the train driver checking for himself that the crossing is clear (no obstacle detection!) and working (indicated by a flashing white light - which might be linked to ERTMS on very recent installations, but certainly wasn't on the Cambrian and obviously isn't in the case of every other ABCL on non-ERTMS lines!). The maximum speed permissible is 55mph, and many are much lower than that (to ensure that the driver has adequate sighting of the crossing in time to stop short if necessary) - all in all, suitable for far fewer locations than AHBs.

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 01/07/2014 at 07:14 #62348
Forest Pines
Avatar
525 posts
" said:
" said:

(I think it's a horribly dangerous crossing for other reasons - at rush hour it regularly has road traffic backed up across it)
It would be mitigated by the fact that a train is starting from a stop and presumably wouldn't proceed if a car is straddling the crossing right in front of it. In the case of stopping trains I'd imagine the signal won't clear until the barriers are proved down which gets rid of the risk of a train appearing with little warning. I grew up in the area and at the time the crossing was modernised in the late 80's the housing estate on the up side of the line wasn't there, Neither was Europarc and in general I don't think traffic was so heavy.


I suspect it wouldn't get commissioned as an AHB today.
Down stopping trains aren't a problem; what scared me were fast trains, particularly Downs. I agree, I don't think it would be commissioned with traffic on Woad Lane what it is today. The problem is homebound commuter traffic coming from Pyewipe and backing up from the junctions at Great Coates church - it improved a little when roundabouts were put in there, but not enough to stop traffic backing up across the crossing. For people who don't know the area: the queue of cars ends up half a mile long!

On the subject of road traffic lights: I assume the crossing at Ashton Jn, Bristol must be interlinked with the traffic lights because the crossing is inside the stop lines of a road junction.

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 01/07/2014 at 07:35 #62350
TomOF
Avatar
452 posts
" said:
Quote:
I'd imagine the signal won't clear until the barriers are proved down which gets rid of the risk of a train appearing with little warning.
Tom, as has been said that's not the case with AHB's. The signal will clear when the sequence has been initiated for long enough to prevent the train arriving before 27 seconds. If starting from a stand this is very likely to be around 10 seconds after the crossing sequence has initiated. (As Clive said actual timings depend on the distance from signal to crossing.)

FF

I should have checked before posting (and owing to tiredness) I ommitted to mention the possibility of non stop controls for Great Coates which having now checked the scheme plans which confirms Marsh Jn has this for Woad Lane - but does not say which direction this applies to. I knew what I wanted to say but did not say it!

As MJ44 on the up line cannot show a red I further assume it applies to the down line.

treadles on the down line are located just before and after the trailing points leading from Marsh Jn giving 40 seconds at 60 mph on the main line - no indication about the other.

There are two further treadles, one of which is slightly beyond the car stop and the other is level with the platform ramp of the down platform at the Grimsby end.

I suspect it is the latter which initiates the lowering sequence for a stopping train (it is not indicated on the plan)

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 01/07/2014 at 10:08 #62352
clive
Avatar
2799 posts
" said:

Rather wide of the mark there, I'm afraid - an ABCL is rather a different beast, in operation, to an AHB, and only really suitable for relatively quiet roads
Which reminds me: what's the difference between an ABCL and an AOCL+B?

Log in to reply
Replacing signals when a train is approaching 01/07/2014 at 10:10 #62353
clive
Avatar
2799 posts
" said:

There are two further treadles, one of which is slightly beyond the car stop and the other is level with the platform ramp of the down platform at the Grimsby end.
I'm not clear about the layout here, so it might not be relevant, but whenever there's a signal that can be held at red by the crossing controls, there should be a treadle just beyond it that starts the crossing sequence (with, IIRC, the barriers dropping as soon as the ambers change to reds) if the signal is SPADed.

Log in to reply