Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

Red aspects at Little Bytham??

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Released > Peterborough > Red aspects at Little Bytham??

Page 1 of 2

Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 20/05/2017 at 17:15 #95241
bugsy
Avatar
1768 posts
I'm playing the 2003 default TT Loader version of Peterborough and am intrigued bt the signals showing a red aspect at Little Bytham (see attached picture). Would someone with local knowledge please explain their purpose.

Thanks in advance
Bugsy

Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate.
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 20/05/2017 at 17:22 #95242
pedroathome
Avatar
916 posts
bugsy in post 95241 said:
I'm playing the 2003 default TT Loader version of Peterborough and am intrigued bt the signals showing a red aspect at Little Bytham (see attached picture). Would someone with local knowledge please explain their purpose.

Thanks in advance
Bugsy
Eerm, you haven't attached a picture

Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 20/05/2017 at 17:53 #95243
bugsy
Avatar
1768 posts
pedroathome in post 95242 said:
bugsy in post 95241 said:
I'm playing the 2003 default TT Loader version of Peterborough and am intrigued bt the signals showing a red aspect at Little Bytham (see attached picture). Would someone with local knowledge please explain their purpose.

Thanks in advance
Bugsy
Eerm, you haven't attached a picture
Opps. Give me a minute.

Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate.
Last edited: 20/05/2017 at 17:54 by bugsy
Reason: Picture now attached

Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 20/05/2017 at 20:33 #95244
BarryM
Avatar
2158 posts
bugsy in post 95241 said:
I'm playing the 2003 default TT Loader version of Peterborough and am intrigued bt the signals showing a red aspect at Little Bytham (see attached picture). Would someone with local knowledge please explain their purpose.

Thanks in advance
Bugsy
I assume a wayside stop. The station closed in September 1959.

Barry

Barry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 20/05/2017 at 20:42 #95245
bugsy
Avatar
1768 posts
I assume a wayside stop. The station closed in September 1959.

Barry

So the signalling wasn't updated then? Too costly I suppose.

Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate.
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 20/05/2017 at 21:01 #95246
jc92
Avatar
3690 posts
Online
bugsy in post 95245 said:
I assume a wayside stop. The station closed in September 1959.

Barry

So the signalling wasn't updated then? Too costly I suppose.
The signalling wasnt in place in 1959! The PSB opened between 72 and 77.

I would think it has something to do either with a former yard or ground frame which was removed early in the Panels life or else is just a standard requirement for a controlled signal to be placed as there is such a long string of automatics.

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 20/05/2017 at 21:31 #95248
postal
Avatar
5265 posts
jc92 in post 95246 said:
The signalling wasnt in place in 1959! The PSB opened between 72 and 77.

I would think it has something to do either with a former yard or ground frame which was removed early in the Panels life or else is just a standard requirement for a controlled signal to be placed as there is such a long string of automatics.
Either reason could also apply to S298/S300 on the Up lines at Little Barford.

“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 20/05/2017 at 22:08 #95252
nnr
Avatar
170 posts
There used to be emergency crossovers there.
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 20/05/2017 at 22:43 #95255
bandiez
Avatar
62 posts
If I remember rightly I believe they are there in the real world at both little bytham and at little barford to protect the overhead neutral sections that are at the locations. Hope that helps
Last edited: 20/05/2017 at 22:43 by bandiez
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: BarryM
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 21/05/2017 at 09:02 #95263
bugsy
Avatar
1768 posts
That's all very interestin guys. Thanks for the info.
Everything that you make will be useful - providing it's made of chocolate.
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 24/05/2017 at 23:14 #95357
chrisdmadd
Avatar
242 posts
Yep protection for the OHNS there's a few like that on this sim.
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 26/05/2017 at 11:44 #95394
CTD Sig
Avatar
29 posts
The OHLE cut-off was mitigated in 2009 with the installation of a new wiring and power system. The neutral section was moved to between Milepost 77.5 and Milepost 78.25. (A little further South.)

The red aspect in real life is due to a section of faulty wire (from 1993-2013) that took two decades to troubleshoot. One of my closest friends is signalling and train deployment manager for Stevenage to Newark N. Gate (Peterborough Sector). Another possibility is that there is an Automatic Tailback Signal Check (ATSC-DA) to minimise delays further down the line for the double track Stoke Tunnel.

TPWS has been installed for 140mph running ever since Class 91s (IC225) were introduced in the early 90s. Therefore no manual signals are required. The emergency crossovers cease to exist, following the restructuring of Peterborough Station's layout whilst building Platforms 6&7. A re-wiring is taking place as we speak.

I hope that helps!

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: VInce
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 26/05/2017 at 12:42 #95397
Steamer
Avatar
3985 posts
CTD Sig in post 95394 said:
The OHLE cut-off was mitigated in 2009 with the installation of a new wiring and power system. The neutral section was moved to between Milepost 77.5 and Milepost 78.25. (A little further South.)
MP 78.25 is just north of New England North Jn, and the location of Bretton F.S. neural section, according to the Sectional Appendix.

This thread is discussing Little Bytham. Bytham OHNS is located at 92m 29ch. Data per Sectional Appendix published online, updated 4th March 2017.

CTD Sig said:
TPWS has been installed for 140mph running ever since Class 91s (IC225) were introduced in the early 90s.
The Class 91s were introduced to service in 1989. The first trackside trials of TPWS did not take place until 1997, according to this RAIB report (Appendix E)

CTD Sig said:
The emergency crossovers cease to exist, following the restructuring of Peterborough Station's layout whilst building Platforms 6&7.
Which emergency crossovers are these? The ones at Little Bytham have been gone for a lot longer than the new layout (they aren't shown in a 2006 Quail map).

CTD Sig said:
One of my closest friends is signalling and train deployment manager for Stevenage to Newark N. Gate (Peterborough Sector).
I'm quite confused by that job title. What are your friend's responsibilities? Signalling is Network Rail's job, I would've thought 'train deployment' was in the TOC's remit?

"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q)
Last edited: 26/05/2017 at 12:47 by Steamer
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 28/05/2017 at 08:31 #95440
Late Turn
Avatar
699 posts
What is this "ATSC-DA" thing, then? I've never ever heard of it (as, until recently, a Signalman working to one of Peterborough's fringes), and a Google search only points to this thread. Is it fictional?
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 28/05/2017 at 11:23 #95444
headshot119
Avatar
4869 posts
Late Turn in post 95440 said:
What is this "ATSC-DA" thing, then? I've never ever heard of it (as, until recently, a Signalman working to one of Peterborough's fringes), and a Google search only points to this thread. Is it fictional?
I was curious as well, but I can't find any reference to the term anywhere online but this thread.

"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 28/05/2017 at 18:04 #95449
CTD Sig
Avatar
29 posts
ATSC-DA: Automatic Tailback Signal Check-Delays Avoidance

This system was developed on the Exeter line c.2012 to minimise delays by moving the tailback for Newark N. Gate, Retford and Doncaster stopping trains (i.e. Non-Grantham and not the express to York trains) to prevent start-stop movement. An 'expert' decided its illogical use at Little Bytham, Great Ponton and Corby Glen was justified. My friend's colleagues are trying to get it removed. However, box-tickers from the RAIB and the HSE think something illogical is 'safe' (so they can side-step any legal responsibility if something goes wrong. It's actually more likely to cause an incident with it because any matter is more easily dismissed by the signalman as 'ATSC-DA doing its weird thing again' rather than 'What's happened? Why is my train stopping in the middle of nowhere?

Sorry about the Class 91 mix-up. Anyway, TPWS (with a different name) WAS used since the Class 91 came on.

Regarding the Emergency Crossovers, they were left there (though the HSE would have probably had something to say about their condition if they were formally 'operational'.) until properly removed after restructuring.

Regarding my friend's job, because VTEC (previously EC) is not the only operator (compared to say, the Brighton ML, where Govia is the sole company.) NR have to approve the timetables.
Also, during works periods, NR normally take over timetabling from the TOCs in order to keep the timetable flowing.

Little Bytham was removed and directly substituted by Fletton.

Hope that helps!

Any more questions that have nothing to do with this, please put that under a new thread if you can. This helps for me to go through the questions. I will hopefully let my friend answer a few questions if/when she comes round.

Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 28/05/2017 at 18:26 #95452
headshot119
Avatar
4869 posts
CTD Sig in post 95449 said:
ATSC-DA: Automatic Tailback Signal Check-Delays Avoidance

This system was developed on the Exeter line c.2012 to minimise delays by moving the tailback for Newark N. Gate, Retford and Doncaster stopping trains (i.e. Non-Grantham and not the express to York trains) to prevent start-stop movement. An 'expert' decided its illogical use at Little Bytham, Great Ponton and Corby Glen was justified. My friend's colleagues are trying to get it removed. However, box-tickers from the RAIB and the HSE think something illogical is 'safe' (so they can side-step any legal responsibility if something goes wrong. It's actually more likely to cause an incident with it because any matter is more easily dismissed by the signalman as 'ATSC-DA doing its weird thing again' rather than 'What's happened? Why is my train stopping in the middle of nowhere?

Sorry about the Class 91 mix-up. Anyway, TPWS (with a different name) WAS used since the Class 91 came on.

Regarding the Emergency Crossovers, they were left there (though the HSE would have probably had something to say about their condition if they were formally 'operational'.) until properly removed after restructuring.

Regarding my friend's job, because VTEC (previously EC) is not the only operator (compared to say, the Brighton ML, where Govia is the sole company.) NR have to approve the timetables.
Also, during works periods, NR normally take over timetabling from the TOCs in order to keep the timetable flowing.

Little Bytham was removed and directly substituted by Fletton.

Hope that helps!

Any more questions that have nothing to do with this, please put that under a new thread if you can. This helps for me to go through the questions. I will hopefully let my friend answer a few questions if/when she comes round.
TPWS with another name? Care to tell us what it was called?

"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 28/05/2017 at 18:32 #95453
jc92
Avatar
3690 posts
Online
Still never heard of this ATSC system. Drivers following a slower train on yellows/double yellows drive slower to try and keep moving but if they stop,they stop.

Never heard of TPWS by another name (unless you mean ATC which was definetely never fitted to a 91).

Regarding timetabling, NR do all the timetabling (minor exceptions for FOCs sorting VSTP and STP paths) TOCs can request a path but they dont timetable it in the true sense.

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 28/05/2017 at 22:48 #95459
Late Turn
Avatar
699 posts
How exactly does this ATSC-DA (that none of us have ever heard of) work then, especially on a relay interlocking? Why would the RAIB or HSE have become involved in its operation, unless there's been a serious incident in which it was a factor?

This 'signalling and train deployment' manager or whatever - NR put the working timetable together for all operators, everywhere, based on the bids that TOCs put in. It's mostly done centrally, with a few bits still done on a regional basis. It isn't done on a local level like this. This job description doesn't add up?

Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 29/05/2017 at 08:29 #95460
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5402 posts
headshot119 in post 95444 said:
Late Turn in post 95440 said:
What is this "ATSC-DA" thing, then? I've never ever heard of it (as, until recently, a Signalman working to one of Peterborough's fringes), and a Google search only points to this thread. Is it fictional?
I was curious as well, but I can't find any reference to the term anywhere online but this thread.
Maybe if Kurt is reading this he will tell us as he works at PBO box.

Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 29/05/2017 at 21:39 #95463
clive
Avatar
2789 posts
Peter Bennet in post 95460 said:

Maybe if Kurt is reading this he will tell us as he works at PBO box.
Not any more.

Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 30/05/2017 at 09:27 #95467
CTD Sig
Avatar
29 posts
TPWS' other name is ATPS.
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 30/05/2017 at 09:27 #95468
CTD Sig
Avatar
29 posts
Advanced Train Protection System
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 30/05/2017 at 09:33 #95469
CTD Sig
Avatar
29 posts
No, the TTs are done on a regional basis. The Peterborough Sector covers ECML Stevenage to Newark, XC Line to Melton, the XC line to Ely, the Lincon line and even a small part of the GEML.
Log in to reply
Red aspects at Little Bytham?? 30/05/2017 at 09:43 #95470
jc92
Avatar
3690 posts
Online
CTD Sig in post 95469 said:
No, the TTs are done on a regional basis. The Peterborough Sector covers ECML Stevenage to Newark, XC Line to Melton, the XC line to Ely, the Lincon line and even a small part of the GEML.
Timetabling is all done centrally in Milton Keynes.

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: Stephen Fulcher, kaiwhara