Page 2 of 2
| V4.3.1 07/03/2018 at 19:39 #106538 | |
VInce
579 posts |
... And I bought a third monitor with USB video adapter so as I can, using new view and patching one area to another down the AB lines, get most sims completely on the three screens Vince I walk around inside the questions of my day, I navigate the inner reaches of my disarray, I pass the altars where fools and thieves hold sway, I wait for night to come and lift this dread away : Jackson Browne - The Night Inside Me Last edited: 07/03/2018 at 20:57 by VInce Reason: None given Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Ar88 |
| V4.3.1 08/03/2018 at 20:44 #106555 | |
BarryM
2158 posts |
Have run into a minor Access Violation whilst playing this sim: Game still playable. Internal exception in MajorCycle stage SIG (EAccessViolation: Access violation at address 00404296 in module 'SimSigLoader.exe'. Read of address F685D88B) Mantis referral: #19893. Barry Barry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Last edited: 08/03/2018 at 20:46 by BarryM Reason: l Log in to reply |
| V4.3.1 09/03/2018 at 17:00 #106561 | |
nnr
170 posts |
Much improved TT, many thanks. There's still a snag at M423 however in that some of the "mainline" (ie long!!) trains will pass it on a yellow and stop in the platform, whereas others just sit at it with a red aspect. It does not appear to affect non - stop workings. I've tried changing the stopping point, but this has had limited success. Could it be something to do with approach control?? Cheers N,. Last edited: 09/03/2018 at 17:01 by nnr Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| V4.3.1 09/03/2018 at 18:50 #106562 | |
postal
5265 posts |
nnr in post 106561 said:Much improved TT, many thanks.It is prototypical. I raised this a few weeks ago with Henry Munro who signalled at Motherwell for a lot of years and he confirmed the situation. The interlocking keeps track of the train length from the number of track circuits occupied as the train approaches Motherwell. M423 is held at R for trains over a certain length until M399 is showing a proceed aspect. As things are set up in the sim, pendolinos and voyagers are within the length parameter so M423 will clear but the ECML IC225 sets (and one train of empty coal hoppers which has a crew change in P2) are overlength and held at M423 until M399 is cleared. That does mean you have to be careful with the empty hoppers (4S34) as there is no point in signalling the train into P2 until you know that the relief crew is going to be there. If you clear M399 to let the train into P2 before the relief crew is available you risk locking up the station while you wait for the relief crew. “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Last edited: 09/03/2018 at 18:51 by postal Reason: None given Log in to reply The following user said thank you: BarryM |
| V4.3.1 09/03/2018 at 20:17 #106564 | |
|
nnr
170 posts |
Ah, mystery solved. Many thanks for your help. N Log in to reply |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 14/03/2018 at 10:04 #106755 | |
|
BarryM
2158 posts |
Running Motherwell's 2006 timetable using latest Loader V4.6.12 train 1S26 at Carstairs at 06:16 finished joining and consequently created 4 error messages: "Bad type for CurrentTrain evaluating" SMC413 PDA twice and Bad type for 413AM PDA twice. Referred it to Mantis # 0018542 Barry Barry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Log in to reply |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 23/03/2018 at 14:16 #106961 | |
|
John 23
176 posts |
I'm running V4.3.1 using loader 4.6.12 and TT v4.2.3 0445 start. I'm finding trains exiting the sim toward Shotts won't pass M626. If instructed manually they cease to be ARS and now won't leave the sim after being authorised to pass signals at danger toward Shotts. Eventually they come up as "No further trips". Suggestions, please! Log in to reply |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 23/03/2018 at 15:10 #106963 | |
Peter Bennet
5402 posts |
John 23 in post 106961 said:I'm running V4.3.1 using loader 4.6.12 and TT v4.2.3 0445 start.You need timetable 4.4.1, which should come from the updates. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 23/03/2018 at 16:14 #106964 | |
|
John 23
176 posts |
Strange: I'm fully updated and I'm not being offered that TT via the Loader.
Last edited: 23/03/2018 at 16:29 by John 23 Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 23/03/2018 at 16:52 #106965 | |
|
Peter Bennet
5402 posts |
Check the timetable folder and see what's there. The timetable no longer has a version number in the title and should be "last modified" on 1 March. If you delete the earlier ones then you should be re-offered the updates. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply The following user said thank you: John 23 |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 23/03/2018 at 17:07 #106966 | |
|
John 23
176 posts |
That seems to have got it sorted.
Log in to reply |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 23/03/2018 at 19:07 #106971 | |
|
bill_gensheet
1413 posts |
I have not yet looked at the 1984 timetable in respect of this update. If anyone is having a go then please point me to any fixes needed. The ARS is known about and not fixable, causes trouble with the loco run round at Holytown. The 2E at Newton is news to me. I do not recall any problems with them. Will look when time allows. This may also kick the 1993 timetable into action. Bill Log in to reply |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 26/04/2018 at 00:51 #107700 | |
|
bill_gensheet
1413 posts |
Have checked a 1984 timetable with the new sim data. The usual problem areas seem OK, so I conclude that v2 is still OK. I did not find any problems with 2E services at Newton. Sleepers at Mossend behave OK ARS gets confused by the run round at Holytown Note that there are earlier versions of the 1984 timetables that WILL NOT be OK. Updates attached, also available in the downloads. As user timetables these DO NOT come though the update process. Bill Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Last edited: 26/04/2018 at 01:17 by bill_gensheet Reason: None given Log in to reply The following user said thank you: BarryM |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 26/04/2018 at 09:44 #107701 | |
|
postal
5265 posts |
bill_gensheet in post 107700 said:Have checked a 1984 timetable with the new sim data. The usual problem areas seem OK, so I conclude that v2 is still OK.File naming seems to fall foul of Geoff's desired position in this thread. “In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe Log in to reply |
| Motherwell V4.3.1 28/04/2018 at 00:18 #107723 | |
|
bill_gensheet
1413 posts |
>> File naming seems to fall foul of Geoff's desired position in this thread. << It is a user timetable so is not being distributed via updater. That is where the problem of having version numbers comes from as it prevents the updater updating. Therefore those getting it manually do need to know the version from the filename. I am avoiding decimals in the name, the problem noted in that thread. regards Bill Log in to reply |