Page 1 of 1
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 01:54 #107547 | |
Kimb01996
![]() 36 posts |
I have a train coming in from wolvercot junction into Banbury then it goes back towards greenford junction via bicester north however this is a freight class 6 so it will only have the one engine at the front so I want to make it run around Banbury so the engine will be facing aynho junction. So far it works up to between Banbury platform 3 but when getting it to stop at either aynho junction or a reversing signal outside the station i get the error message no no route between location Banbury and location Banbury
Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 12:47 #107556 | |
Ar88
![]() 310 posts |
Is the route there to get from the reversing point to the platform? Have you set the reversing point on the TT as the apppopriate signal? The Welsh contingent. Aron, or Ar to mates. Also known as 88E or ThatManCalledAr. Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 13:20 #107558 | |
Kimb01996
![]() 36 posts |
Ar88 in post 107556 said:Is the route there to get from the reversing point to the platform?the route is set from banbury platform 4 to banbury resevoir n then banbury paltform 3 then banbury south reverse ol9111 then to banbury platform where it join 6j42 Last edited: 16/04/2018 at 13:25 by Kimb01996 Reason: None given Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 13:34 #107559 | |
9pN1SEAp
![]() 1140 posts |
On the south side, the following path worked for me: BAN P1 -> BAN Rec Rd -> BAN S (Rev. 9111) -> BAN P3 I must admit, I couldn't work out how to run around the Fenny Compton side though...! Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 13:58 #107560 | |
Steamer
![]() 3958 posts |
There appears to be a path missing between Banbury North and Banbury (Mantis 20164), meaning you can't timetable a reversal at the north end at the moment. Kimb01996 in post 107547 said: this is a freight class 6 so it will only have the one engine at the frontNot necessarily- if it's an engineer's train it could be top and tailed. It could also be a track machine (a tamper, for example). Where's the train coming from/going to, and what's the timing load? "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Last edited: 16/04/2018 at 14:11 by Steamer Reason: None given Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 14:32 #107563 | |
Kimb01996
![]() 36 posts |
Steamer in post 107560 said:There appears to be a path missing between Banbury North and Banbury (Mantis 20164), meaning you can't timetable a reversal at the north end at the moment.it doesn't say the train is 6j42 train uid ∇54910 Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 14:33 #107564 | |
Kimb01996
![]() 36 posts |
Kimb01996 in post 107563 said:Steamer in post 107560 said:There appears to be a path missing between Banbury North and Banbury (Mantis 20164), meaning you can't timetable a reversal at the north end at the moment.it doesn't say the train is 6j42 train uid ∇54910 running from Westbury Down Yard to Greenford West Junction Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 14:42 #107565 | |
headshot119
![]() 4869 posts |
Isn't 6J42 a Colas tamper headcode?
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 15:00 #107568 | |
Meld
![]() 1108 posts |
Assuming that Kims dated the TT wrong in the 0Z06 thread and is doing Xmas Eve as per this thread https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Forum/ThreadView/47581. As you can see 6J42 is indeed a Colas tamper 6J42 Runs on 24/12/2017 VSTP schedule runs Su from 24/12/2017 - 24/12/2017 Operated by Colas Civil Engineers Diesel Locomotive Timed to run at 134mph BTW Kim on VSTP ignore the timed to run at speeds as all VSTPs do not generate the correct timing speed Passed the age to be doing 'Spoon Feeding' !!! Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 15:02 #107569 | |
Kimb01996
![]() 36 posts |
Meld in post 107568 said:Assuming that Kims dated the TT wrong in the 0Z06 thread and is doing Xmas Eve as per this thread https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Forum/ThreadView/47581. As you can see 6J42 is indeed a Colas tamperthats lovely thank you very much Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 18:27 #107573 | |
GeoffM
![]() 6344 posts ![]() |
9pN1SEAp in post 107559 said:On the south side, the following path worked for me: BAN P1 -> BAN Rec Rd -> BAN S (Rev. 9111) -> BAN P3Banbury Banbury North Banbury 2016 era assumed due to mention of OL9111. SimSig Boss Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 18:29 #107576 | |
GeoffM
![]() 6344 posts ![]() |
Meld in post 107568 said:Timed to run at 134mphFor VSTP the number is in metres per second (60mph in this case). I can't remember the back story, probably VSTPs are prepared on a different system to regular timetables. SimSig Boss Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Meld |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 18:30 #107577 | |
Steamer
![]() 3958 posts |
GeoffM in post 107573 said:9pN1SEAp in post 107559 said:Banbury North-> Banbury path missing, as posted above. (#20164)On the south side, the following path worked for me: BAN P1 -> BAN Rec Rd -> BAN S (Rev. 9111) -> BAN P3Banbury "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 18:41 #107581 | |
GeoffM
![]() 6344 posts ![]() |
Steamer in post 107577 said:GeoffM in post 107573 said:404: caffeine not found. Sorry, misunderstood.9pN1SEAp in post 107559 said:Banbury North-> Banbury path missing, as posted above. (#20164)On the south side, the following path worked for me: BAN P1 -> BAN Rec Rd -> BAN S (Rev. 9111) -> BAN P3Banbury SimSig Boss Log in to reply The following users said thank you: Steamer, Ar88 |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 19:00 #107582 | |
TUT
![]() 514 posts |
GeoffM in post 107576 said:Meld in post 107568 said:Surely 134 metres per second is even faster? As close as makes no difference 300 mph?Timed to run at 134mphFor VSTP the number is in metres per second (60mph in this case). I can't remember the back story, probably VSTPs are prepared on a different system to regular timetables. Log in to reply |
Run around procedure 16/04/2018 at 19:19 #107583 | |
Steamer
![]() 3958 posts |
TUT in post 107582 said:GeoffM in post 107576 said:I think it's that a value in mph is being entered into the system, however the system thinks the input is in m/s, which it then converts to mph.Meld in post 107568 said:Surely 134 metres per second is even faster? As close as makes no difference 300 mph?Timed to run at 134mphFor VSTP the number is in metres per second (60mph in this case). I can't remember the back story, probably VSTPs are prepared on a different system to regular timetables. 60m/s = 134mph "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Last edited: 16/04/2018 at 19:20 by Steamer Reason: None given Log in to reply The following user said thank you: TUT |
Run around procedure 17/04/2018 at 17:17 #107592 | |
GeoffM
![]() 6344 posts ![]() |
TUT in post 107582 said:GeoffM in post 107576 said:I refer to my earlier comment. Just back to front, that is all.Meld in post 107568 said:Surely 134 metres per second is even faster? As close as makes no difference 300 mph?Timed to run at 134mphFor VSTP the number is in metres per second (60mph in this case). I can't remember the back story, probably VSTPs are prepared on a different system to regular timetables. SimSig Boss Log in to reply |