Page 1 of 1
| Couple of observations 12/03/2019 at 22:54 #116346 | |
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
Hi, Two things noticed in tonight's game: 1. ACI doesn't seem to work at Leigh-on-Sea Platform 1 (Up Main). There's a train 5B05 that starts there as 1B05 and it reliably doesn't step up the berth. 2. Realtime Trains shows Ripple Lane West SS, Renwick Road Jn and Ripple Lane East SS as timing points for all services. However when some or all of these are used, ARS makes a decision to route into Ripple Lane West. This affects both Up and Down services even when the path at DDK or BKG is ML. Freights pathed for ML call wrong route if directed into the yard, and pax (also affected) risk running out of juice. Omitting all three of these points makes ARS work correctly. Thanks Jamie Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 12/03/2019 at 23:10 #116347 | |
MarkC
1105 posts |
9pN1SEAp in post 116346 said:Hi,What Timetable are you using? And can you provide a save please. Last edited: 12/03/2019 at 23:30 by MarkC Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 12/03/2019 at 23:20 #116349 | |
|
JamesN
1607 posts |
On 2. - RTT shows all locations with a time, regardless of whether the train is actually timed there or in some cases regardless of whether or not the location is even a timetabled location at all. For the non-timed locations the time inserted is pure guesswork; I believe based off mileage. It is more than useless for timetabling purposes in SimSig. Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 12/03/2019 at 23:25 #116350 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
JamesN in post 116349 said:On 2. - RTT shows all locations with a time, regardless of whether the train is actually timed there or in some cases regardless of whether or not the location is even a timetabled location at all. For the non-timed locations the time inserted is pure guesswork; I believe based off mileage.Though I would like to add only for schedules less than 7 days I'm advance, further than that and it shows the "true schedule". "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 13/03/2019 at 00:10 #116352 | |
Edgemaster
332 posts |
JamesN in post 116349 said:It is more than useless for timetabling purposes in SimSig. OpenTrainTimes shows a more 'pure' form of the scheduled service. Alternatively, the open rail data from Charlwood House ( http://www.charlwoodhouse.co.uk/rail/liverail ) shows a very raw view of the timetable data output by Network Rail. Last edited: 13/03/2019 at 00:10 by Edgemaster Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 14/03/2019 at 16:04 #116375 | |
|
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
MarkC in post 116347 said:9pN1SEAp in post 116346 said:I've attached the TT. Sadly didn't get a save of the ACI (at approx. 0630) as the signaller was going to use the centre platform - then didn't!Hi,What Timetable are you using? And can you provide a save please. Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 14/03/2019 at 16:30 #116376 | |
|
MarkC
1105 posts |
9pN1SEAp in post 116346 said:Hi,Reported Mantis 0024172 Last edited: 14/03/2019 at 16:30 by MarkC Reason: None given Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 15/12/2020 at 22:37 #134769 | |
|
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
Hi, TrackMaps 2:4A shows the section UR830-UR831 (and slightly towards Ford but not ARC) as electrified, but AC locos currently complain about unsuitable traction. The unwired overrun/cripple (?) siding to the CTRL Down Connector doesn't have a grey arrow. I presume there's no control table for it IRL? Thanks Jamie Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 16/12/2020 at 17:47 #134784 | |
Steamer
3984 posts |
9pN1SEAp in post 134769 said:Hi,Logged on Mantis, #32529 Quote: The unwired overrun/cripple (?) siding to the CTRL Down Connector doesn't have a grey arrow. I presume there's no control table for it IRL?It's just a trap point/overrun to stop anything running away on to the CTRL. In this instance it can't be used for shunting. "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply The following user said thank you: 9pN1SEAp |
| Couple of observations 28/12/2020 at 10:58 #135464 | |
|
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
Hi, Trains stepping up from Purfleet Yard are now giving "Non-described train in berth 0656", even when the TRN is already interposed. Also, UR1147 (GPS on Dagenham Dock P1) doesn't allow setting route to 631 to cross to Down Tilbury, only shunt into yard - I presume this is correct? Thanks Jamie Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 28/12/2020 at 20:16 #135488 | |
|
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
Another weird one - setting UR1125 (RPLLWSS Line 2 Down exit) to UR809 causes "***" to appear in the siding with message "Non-described train in berth 1125". See attached just before. Thanks Jamie Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 13/01/2021 at 16:38 #136359 | |
|
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
One more query - this time Jurgens MCB crossing. I note that this is always shown as "Crossing Clear" even though it would appear to be frequently-used. I see from Google Maps there is a man in a box mid-crossing :) Thanks Jamie Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 13/01/2021 at 17:20 #136366 | |
|
Steamer
3984 posts |
9pN1SEAp in post 136359 said:One more query - this time Jurgens MCB crossing.Manual states that the crossing is closed, however looking at Google Maps and Quail I agree it's definitely in use. "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 14/10/2022 at 15:47 #148368 | |
|
Alarmkid23
5 posts |
can you let the devs of the LTS simulation know about jurgens please?
Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 14/10/2022 at 16:21 #148369 | |
jc92
3685 posts 
|
Alarmkid23 in post 148368 said:can you let the devs of the LTS simulation know about jurgens please?Already raised and marked resolved Mantis 0032803. notes show the LC is shown on the sim and still works. I agree it shouldn't show as permanently closed and clear and should lower like the others, but the developer has reviewed and decided its fine as is. "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 15/10/2022 at 17:11 #148376 | |
|
Alarmkid23
5 posts |
can i view the notes from Mantis 0032803 please.
Log in to reply |
| Couple of observations 15/10/2022 at 18:08 #148377 | |
|
headshot119
4869 posts |
Hi, we don't generally dive into the information in Mantis tickets, there's a little bit more information on Mantis in general here.
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |