Page 3 of 3
| User-contributed timetables - a fresh approach needed? 06/01/2021 at 05:09 #136027 | |
jc92
3687 posts |
https://www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack%3Attuse%3Attdecisions Wiki page on decisions which is found under the first link of the page you linked "introduction to writing" along with a large number of other subjects. "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
| User-contributed timetables - a fresh approach needed? 07/01/2021 at 12:04 #136058 | |
Ray
211 posts |
Its great to see user contributed timetables being revised and added to the website and I am sure we all download them and add them to the correct folder in our computers. Then the problem arises where we have a sizeable volume of timetables all with similar titles. Which is the most up to date ? Which tt can be deleted ? There is surely a case for well tested and popular timetables to be incorporated as core timetables forming part of the database linked directly to the simulation. When one links on a simulation, you are automatically provided with a choice of tts, the core ones and the adopted ones. Last edited: 07/01/2021 at 12:05 by Ray Reason: spelling Log in to reply |
| User-contributed timetables - a fresh approach needed? 07/01/2021 at 12:20 #136059 | |
9pN1SEAp
1180 posts |
Would there be a case for timetables that are well-tested, accepted and being maintained, to be officially adopted into the manifest distribution? This might also offer benefits in terms of TT issues being recorded in Mantis so that other timetables may benefit from the shared wisdom? Thanks Jamie Jamie S (JAMS) Log in to reply The following users said thank you: Albert, Trainfan344 |