Page 1 of 1
NR Scotland Train code rule change, 2022 14/12/2020 at 00:36 #134704 | |
DaveHarries
![]() 1280 posts |
Greetings all, I am not trying to rejuvenate the discussion about the accident at Stonehaven from earlier this year, and all the business surrounding it, but I thought I would share this. Network Rail (Scotland) have said on the rule changes for their Timetable Planning Regulations for 2022 that train code 1T08 is "not to be used as a reporting number on the Scotland route" as per the attached image. Presumably this takes effect when the May 2022 timetable kicks in. The document containing this rule change can be downloaded from Network Rail's website at https://www.networkrail.co.uk/industry-and-commercial/information-for-operators/operational-rules/ => TPR 2022. That downloads a ZIP file and it is in a PDF file therein. Hope I haven't done something wrong by posting this: apologies if I have. Dave ![]() Post has attachments. Log in to view them. Last edited: 14/12/2020 at 00:40 by DaveHarries Reason: None given Log in to reply The following users said thank you: Hap, andyallen4014, danners430, StepSig |
[Stonehaven-related] NR Scotland Train code rule change, 2022 14/12/2020 at 10:01 #134710 | |
kaiwhara
![]() 587 posts |
No harm in posting this. Personally I think it's quite an honourable, respectful touch!
Sorry guys, I am in the business of making people wait! Last edited: 14/12/2020 at 10:01 by kaiwhara Reason: None given Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Hap |
[Stonehaven-related] NR Scotland Train code rule change, 2022 14/12/2020 at 12:50 #134717 | |
Hap
![]() 1016 posts |
Perfectly happy to see this, and glad I won't have to see or work under that headcode again. It seems the feeling is mutual amongst my colleagues.
How to report an issue: www.SimSig.co.uk/Wiki/Show?page=usertrack:reportanissue Log in to reply The following user said thank you: danners430 |
[Stonehaven-related] NR Scotland Train code rule change, 2022 14/12/2020 at 15:16 #134725 | |
jc92
![]() 3649 posts ![]() |
Is there a precedent for this sort of thing or is this a first?
"We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
[Stonehaven-related] NR Scotland Train code rule change, 2022 14/12/2020 at 15:35 #134726 | |
Splodge
![]() 710 posts |
jc92 in post 134725 said:Is there a precedent for this sort of thing or is this a first?Airlines have often done it for flight numbers involved in fatal accidents, though I'm not sure headcodes have been retired before. There's the right way, the wrong way and the railway. Log in to reply |
[Stonehaven-related] NR Scotland Train code rule change, 2022 14/12/2020 at 16:25 #134730 | |
Steamer
![]() 3958 posts |
Splodge in post 134726 said:jc92 in post 134725 said:The only thing I can think of that's similar is when 91023 was renumbered to 91132 following its overhaul in the mid 2000s (the rest of the fleet simply had 100 added to the old number); the reason being that it was 'pushing' at both Hatfield and Great Heck.Is there a precedent for this sort of thing or is this a first?Airlines have often done it for flight numbers involved in fatal accidents, though I'm not sure headcodes have been retired before. I vaguely remember reading about a diesel loco that was re-numbered following a string of incidents, but I can't remember any details. "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
[Stonehaven-related] NR Scotland Train code rule change, 2022 14/12/2020 at 16:39 #134731 | |
clive
![]() 2766 posts |
I know that the crossover at Potters Bar was left out of use for some time after it was repaired because the families of the victims hadn't been told it was going to be used again.
Log in to reply |
[Stonehaven-related] NR Scotland Train code rule change, 2022 15/12/2020 at 00:54 #134752 | |
bill_gensheet
![]() 1357 posts |
Steamer in post 134730 said:maybe 47216 to 47299 ? Something about a prophecy from a clairvoyant too IIRC Log in to reply |