Page 1 of 1
W111 double yellow aspect 31/10/2022 at 18:31 #148555 | |
Thomas Isherwood
![]() 9 posts |
Hi there, While on Westbury panel, I've noticed that W111 has a double yellow aspect. Unless this has changed when Westbury was re-signalled, I can confirm that W111 does not have a double yellow aspect in reality. Wondering if it's something that could be updated? Log in to reply |
W111 double yellow aspect 31/10/2022 at 19:37 #148556 | |
headshot119
![]() 4869 posts |
Route learning material, and a signalling plan shows W111 to be a 4 aspect signal with position light. Also https://photos.signalling.org/picture?/4834/category/354-2007 "Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Last edited: 31/10/2022 at 19:39 by headshot119 Reason: None given Log in to reply The following users said thank you: pedroathome, TUT |
W111 double yellow aspect 31/10/2022 at 19:55 #148557 | |
pedroathome
![]() 906 posts ![]() |
I'll link a video from the late 80s, showing W111 (Decent video to watch as well) https://youtu.be/R8E4vPxHehc?t=321 James Log in to reply |
W111 double yellow aspect 01/11/2022 at 18:26 #148577 | |
JamesN
![]() 1591 posts ![]() |
It's not quite as clear cut as either side has put across... W111 is a 4 Aspect Signal (and indeed all of 111/211/311/411/511 are), however YY aspect is only shown/available for routes towards Heywood Rd Junction. Routes towards 115 will only show Y or G. Log in to reply The following users said thank you: headshot119, pedroathome |
W111 double yellow aspect 03/11/2022 at 14:14 #148606 | |
Thomas Isherwood
![]() 9 posts |
Apologies, I should've been more clear. As James has said, and what I meant to put across, is that W111 does not show a double yellow aspect towards Hawkeridge Jn. This applies to W311 and W411 also. Just for source to substantiate the info I'm giving, I'm a dispatcher at Westbury and so have had my fair share of interaction with these signals as you can imagine! Last edited: 03/11/2022 at 14:15 by Thomas Isherwood Reason: None given Log in to reply |