Walsall SX 2009-10-15

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Timetables > Walsall > Walsall SX 2009-10-15

Page 1 of 1

Walsall SX 2009-10-15 11/07/2024 at 20:48 #157801
eps125
Avatar
160 posts
Online
Walsall SX 2009-10-15

This thread is for discussion of the Walsall SX 2009-10-15 timetable.

Log in to reply
Walsall SX 2009-10-15 14/07/2024 at 01:43 #157843
jtai13
Avatar
6 posts
Might be, missing a 0000 seed for 3S86?
Also looks like the rule for 6V19 is the opposite way around

Last edited: 14/07/2024 at 04:33 by jtai13
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Walsall SX 2009-10-15 14/07/2024 at 10:38 #157847
eps125
Avatar
160 posts
Online
jtai13 in post 157843 said:
Might be, missing a 0000 seed for 3S86?
Also looks like the rule for 6V19 is the opposite way around
Good Morning,

Thanks for reporting Mantis 41110 and Mantis 41111 applies. They have been fixed for the next timetable version.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: jtai13
Walsall SX 2009-10-15 16/07/2024 at 06:27 #157864
0D07
Avatar
91 posts
Had a quick look at the Demo of Walsall Yesterday.

The FLHH Coal traffic to and from Rugeley is shown going into Bescot Yard. Working for Freightliner Heavy Haul and managing those services along with all the other coal and potash and DCE Services. These trains never went into Bescot Yard to run round they did the run rounds in the Up Goods Loop next to the Up Yard. Every one of the trains I rode on to Rugeley did this, the locomotives chopped off changed end at Tame Bridge Parkway at the Position light on the floor and then came back on at the Position Light on the Down Road. Simplified Brake Test and away to Rugeley or back to Barrow Hill and beyond.

The relevant WTT's show these as running round in the Goods Loop as well as i just checked and the FLHH Train plans that I have also so the timings for Bescot Up and Down Goods Loop.

Regards,
Delta Zero Seven

Last edited: 16/07/2024 at 09:03 by 0D07
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: jc92, Soton_Speed
Walsall SX 2009-10-15 18/07/2024 at 21:37 #157884
eps125
Avatar
160 posts
Online
0D07 in post 157864 said:
Had a quick look at the Demo of Walsall Yesterday.

The FLHH Coal traffic to and from Rugeley is shown going into Bescot Yard. Working for Freightliner Heavy Haul and managing those services along with all the other coal and potash and DCE Services. These trains never went into Bescot Yard to run round they did the run rounds in the Up Goods Loop next to the Up Yard. Every one of the trains I rode on to Rugeley did this, the locomotives chopped off changed end at Tame Bridge Parkway at the Position light on the floor and then came back on at the Position Light on the Down Road. Simplified Brake Test and away to Rugeley or back to Barrow Hill and beyond.

The relevant WTT's show these as running round in the Goods Loop as well as i just checked and the FLHH Train plans that I have also so the timings for Bescot Up and Down Goods Loop.

Regards,
Delta Zero Seven
Mantis 41161 to be investigated.

Log in to reply
Walsall SX 2009-10-15 02/09/2024 at 20:50 #158395
bescot42
Avatar
8 posts
Train 6F16 / H75903 is timetabled into Walsall platform 2 from Bescot Junction - Pleck Junction. Is this possible? Save attached.
Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Log in to reply
Walsall SX 2009-10-15 03/09/2024 at 06:25 #158396
Stephen Fulcher
Avatar
2088 posts
bescot42 in post 158395 said:
Train 6F16 / H75903 is timetabled into Walsall platform 2 from Bescot Junction - Pleck Junction. Is this possible? Save attached.
Mantis 41370

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: bescot42
Walsall SX 2009-10-15 04/09/2024 at 22:18 #158409
bescot42
Avatar
8 posts
I think there is a rule missing for 4M91. I'm about to have two trains with the same code. Save attached.
Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
Log in to reply
Walsall SX 2009-10-15 04/09/2024 at 22:40 #158410
eps125
Avatar
160 posts
Online
bescot42 in post 158409 said:
I think there is a rule missing for 4M91. I'm about to have two trains with the same code. Save attached.
Thanks for the report Mantis 41372.

Log in to reply