Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

Person82, Kage, 442s3, andi, jem771, kpl455, Meld, mailguru23605 (8 users seen recently)

Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Released > Doncaster (Station) > Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln

Page 1 of 1

Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 11:35 #158144
Giantray
Avatar
347 posts
"Deleted due to condescending remarks from another Simsigger."
Professionalism mean nothing around a bunch of Amateur wannabees!
Last edited: 13/08/2024 at 11:24 by Giantray
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 11:53 #158145
madaboutrains
Avatar
316 posts
These crossings are operated by the signaller at Beckington I believe so inaffect acting as a crossing keeper for Doncaster. Putting a reminder on these signals wouldnt do anything for this reason. Attached a photo of the real panel.


Post has attachments. Log in to view them.
RIP Feltham Panel 1
Log in to reply
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 14:32 #158148
clive
Avatar
2789 posts
Looking at that photo, D760 is an auto, so collaring it won't do anything. (Collars work on route setting, not aspect controls.)

The "oi!" phone calls only apply to AHB, ABCL, AOCL, MCL, and TEL crossings, not MCBs (whether CCTV or not). So there's something odd going on with those crossings.

Log in to reply
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 17:45 #158150
jc92
Avatar
3685 posts
Giantray in post 158144 said:
Whilst playing Doncaster Station Simsig, several times having collared up (placing reminder appliances) on signals at Danger protecting crossings on the Up & Down Lincoln lines, having given permission for large loads, slow vehicles etc to cross, I was getting phone calls with message, I thought you told me it was safe. Investigating further I discovered the following faults.
.....
Unless there is a special feature at Doncaster, normally when collaring a controlled or semi-auto signal, as these protecting signals are, it prevents the signal from clearing, in other words maintaining them at Danger. This is the case on the Doncaster Station Simsig for other protecting signals on the Up & Down Lincoln not mentioned above and those at Sutton CCTV near Ranskill Loops. I haven't tested those northern end of Doncaster Station.
How long has this been a Simsig feature? I didn't realise you could collar 3rd party controlled/slotted signals to prevent them clearing. is this some sort of compromise vs real life where it doesn't work that way?

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 18:33 #158153
flabberdacks
Avatar
636 posts
My friend, none of those are controlled signals.

Your only options to protect those crossings are controlled signals at Bessacarr Jn (up line) and the emergency replacement button on D757 near Broomston (down line).

The signals you refer to are all automatic, whether they have the permissive plate displayed or otherwise.

I will leave it up to a railwayman of your experience to know what happens when you put a block on an automatic signal.

Piping hot regards,
Flabberdacks

Log in to reply
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 18:45 #158154
JamesN
Avatar
1607 posts
In reality, I suspect the signaller on Doncaster Panel would be able to instruct the crossing keeper to maintain their signals at Danger to protect the UWCs for you.
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: sunocske
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 21:39 #158157
clive
Avatar
2789 posts
madaboutrains in post 158145 said:
Attached a photo of the real panel.

What's this "Code 2" thing and what looks like something similar related to 760?

Log in to reply
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 21:49 #158158
Stephen Fulcher
Avatar
2078 posts
Code 2 is probably an AWS fault - horn instead of a bell
Log in to reply
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 22:34 #158161
jc92
Avatar
3685 posts
The other label looks like phone scripting for temporary block working in both directions/3.5 working?
"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 13/08/2024 at 05:44 #158162
0D07
Avatar
91 posts
jc92 in post 158161 said:
The other label looks like phone scripting for temporary block working in both directions/3.5 working?
3.5 Working is implemented from the 1st October till the end of the RHTT Season on that section as a matter of course. It has been for the last few years and it is listed in the Network Rail's Autumn arrangements information that we get sent every year.

D07

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: jc92
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 17/08/2024 at 08:29 #158220
Guts
Avatar
604 posts
0D07 in post 158162 said:
jc92 in post 158161 said:
The other label looks like phone scripting for temporary block working in both directions/3.5 working?
3.5 Working is implemented from the 1st October till the end of the RHTT Season on that section as a matter of course. It has been for the last few years and it is listed in the Network Rail's Autumn arrangements information that we get sent every year.

D07
Can I ask what the reason is? Not seen or heard that before.

Log in to reply
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 17/08/2024 at 10:48 #158224
0D07
Avatar
91 posts
Guts in post 158220 said:
0D07 in post 158162 said:
jc92 in post 158161 said:
The other label looks like phone scripting for temporary block working in both directions/3.5 working?
3.5 Working is implemented from the 1st October till the end of the RHTT Season on that section as a matter of course. It has been for the last few years and it is listed in the Network Rail's Autumn arrangements information that we get sent every year.

D07
Can I ask what the reason is? Not seen or heard that before.
Yeah,

The reason was because the line was lightly used and to certain extent it is compared to other lines in the area despite most intermodal traffic now been taken off the ECML. The line suffered with a lot of wrong side failures even the RHTT vanished at one point on that section of line to mitigate against 3.5 was implemented every leaf fall season.
The same was done between Gilberdyke and Selby trains had to clear Howden before another could be sent towards Selby. Also Castleford to Milford Jn was another area where this occurred. Was never a problem tho when the Vegetation used to be maintained regularly.

Zero Delta Zero Seven

Log in to reply