Upcoming Games

(UTC times)


Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

hungerford incorrect signal numbers

You are here: Home > Forum > Simulations > Released > Westbury > hungerford incorrect signal numbers

Page 1 of 1

hungerford incorrect signal numbers 10/02/2010 at 23:45 #693
casey jones
Avatar
72 posts
hi guys

just running the westbury sim i had a track curcuit failure on the up westbury line protecting hungerford level crossing and noticed the signals on the up RK101 and RK104 down westbury are incorrect the signals are controlled signals from reading psb they should be R845 up wesbury and R856 on the down westbury the signals are cleared when the crossing keeper lowers the barriers

cheer

mick

Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 10/02/2010 at 23:45 #6600
casey jones
Avatar
72 posts
hi guys

just running the westbury sim i had a track curcuit failure on the up westbury line protecting hungerford level crossing and noticed the signals on the up RK101 and RK104 down westbury are incorrect the signals are controlled signals from reading psb they should be R845 up wesbury and R856 on the down westbury the signals are cleared when the crossing keeper lowers the barriers

cheer

mick

Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 11/02/2010 at 00:59 #6601
UKTrainMan
Avatar
1803 posts
Could be a stab in the candlelit dark here but could this have something to do with it? [sub](see second section from the bottom)[/sub]

Long shot but it could be?!!

Any views and / or opinions expressed by myself are from me personally and do not represent those of any company I either work for or am a consultant for.
Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 11/02/2010 at 09:40 #6602
casey jones
Avatar
72 posts
UKTrainMan said:
Could be a stab in the candlelit dark here but could this have something to do with it? (see second section from the bottom)

yep no probs i got that .

cheers
mick
ps

i never read instructions

Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 11/02/2010 at 11:34 #6606
GeoffM
Avatar
6376 posts
In Kintbury crossing box the signals are identified as K104 etc, but in Reading they are identified as R856 etc. On the ground the signals are plated R856 etc. Kintbury slots the signals to Reading, allowing the signals to clear once the barriers are down and crossing clear.

The decision was made in SimSig to reflect the fact that Kintbury is involved, hence the RK104 identification. The opinion of whether it's wrong really depends on whose perspective you are looking at which is why a compromise identity was chosen.

SimSig Boss
Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 11/02/2010 at 18:31 #6610
Mikey
Avatar
15 posts
And soon, someone will go out with a can of paint and spray on letter "T" on these signals to become TR856 etc.....
Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 11/02/2010 at 19:11 #6611
JamesN
Avatar
1608 posts
Online
I was under the impression they were gonna be little stickers with "TR" on over the original R Mikey...
Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 12/02/2010 at 01:33 #6616
casey jones
Avatar
72 posts
fair play geoff
i only see the signal plates as a driver what ever signal plate number is shown the comunication is with the signal box at reading.i visit regular and all the signalmen or being trained at the new signalling centre at didcot on the simulator ARS etc at Reading is going to be a nightmare when it fullly opens new year time


cheers

mick

Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 12/02/2010 at 08:26 #6617
Mikey
Avatar
15 posts
@ James: To be honest, I don't know how they are going to replate. I was just being a bit cheeky in suggesting that they spray paint the letter "T" on so that it is done on the cheap. I am sure that it will be a professional job done. Mick will be able to confirm this next month. Meanwhile, the moment these letter "T"s are being applied, many people on this forum wouldn't care less as they will be involved in a certain gathering in Peterborough.

@Mick: Nightmare? It just depends on which approach you take to operating the IECC, like. I intend to avoid nightmares myself, and I am sure the others will too, like....

Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 12/02/2010 at 10:48 #6618
casey jones
Avatar
72 posts
I was down newbury-bedwyn last night with a trainee driver i was checking the signal numbers.



When Reading Psb moves it will be a nightmare ive seen photos of the new signalling centre at didcot and Lavington to kintbury first stage soon then as far as theale.I guess geoff is fully involved with the design of the new workstations for the new box.

Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 12/02/2010 at 13:57 #6624
TomOF
Avatar
452 posts
casey jones said:
When Reading Psb moves it will be a nightmare

I'm not sure why exactly. If properly planned and executed the move should go ahead with the minimum of fuss.
casey jones said:
I guess geoff is fully involved with the design of the new workstations for the new box.

The new IECC style workstations are being provided by Delta Rail. The Berks and Hants line will be known as Workstation 4. It is one of the simulations that TRE are doing. Imagine flipping the layout upside down to Westbury SIMSIG and that's pretty much what it looks like. Trains on the first phase will appear on the Train describers when leaving Heywood Road Jn and Newbury. The second phase will go right past Theale to just before Reading West.

To return to the Original point, There are some locations supervised by the crossing keepers with various slots needing to be given before signals will clear.

Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 12/02/2010 at 14:03 #6625
Mikey
Avatar
15 posts
21st March: Heywood Road Jn - Hamstead LC (not quite Newbury)
25th April: Hamstead LC - Theale

Sometimes in the summer (don't know exactly when): Cholsey and Goring & Streatley

All of Reading Panel closed in Christmas period of December 2010 (bet you didn't know Christmas happens in December huh?)

Log in to reply
hungerford incorrect signal numbers 12/02/2010 at 15:43 #6628
casey jones
Avatar
72 posts
thanks for the info

the nigtmare bit is when the blockade starts a lot of diversions and movement of trains either side of the engineering works to keep some sort of service

cheers
mick

Log in to reply